Locating the alternative digital. Care, code, and community for alternative urban economies

Samantha Cenere
{"title":"Locating the alternative digital. Care, code, and community for alternative urban economies","authors":"Samantha Cenere","doi":"10.1016/j.diggeo.2025.100114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The relationship between urban socio-spatial practices and digital technologies has been extensively scrutinised. Recently, research has driven attention to grassroots, non-corporate socio-technical experiments that contribute to the enactment of economic diversity while prefiguring alternative digital urban futures.</div><div>The article discusses two initiatives in the city of Turin, Italy. The first one, CeloCelo, is an online platform allowing people to donate objects and local third sector associations to collect them and assign to people in need. The second one, COSO, is a project employing a Blockchain-based wallet app to provide the neighbourhood community with instruments to support grassroots alternative sharing economies.</div><div>The article conceptualises the two investigated initiatives as digitally enabled alternative economies that variously co-constitute geographies of caring in the city. Employing qualitative methods, the research sheds light on how the enactment of caring is enabled by alternative forms of economic relations, which support the circulation of care in the city through the more-than-human collectives that sustain alternative economies. Specific attention is paid to the generative capacities of the digital technologies employed in order to understand their role in the unfolding of the socio-spatial relations that sustain alternative economies. In doing so, the present research aims at contributing to overcoming digital geographies that are still too prone to reading for hegemonies, while keeping an eye open to the need of reading the economy for difference (Gibson-Graham, 2006).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100377,"journal":{"name":"Digital Geography and Society","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Geography and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666378325000030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between urban socio-spatial practices and digital technologies has been extensively scrutinised. Recently, research has driven attention to grassroots, non-corporate socio-technical experiments that contribute to the enactment of economic diversity while prefiguring alternative digital urban futures.
The article discusses two initiatives in the city of Turin, Italy. The first one, CeloCelo, is an online platform allowing people to donate objects and local third sector associations to collect them and assign to people in need. The second one, COSO, is a project employing a Blockchain-based wallet app to provide the neighbourhood community with instruments to support grassroots alternative sharing economies.
The article conceptualises the two investigated initiatives as digitally enabled alternative economies that variously co-constitute geographies of caring in the city. Employing qualitative methods, the research sheds light on how the enactment of caring is enabled by alternative forms of economic relations, which support the circulation of care in the city through the more-than-human collectives that sustain alternative economies. Specific attention is paid to the generative capacities of the digital technologies employed in order to understand their role in the unfolding of the socio-spatial relations that sustain alternative economies. In doing so, the present research aims at contributing to overcoming digital geographies that are still too prone to reading for hegemonies, while keeping an eye open to the need of reading the economy for difference (Gibson-Graham, 2006).
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信