Effect of pre-straining on the forming limit of interstitial free high strength steel: Insights on microstructure and crystallographic texture evolution

IF 6.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Pavan Kumar , Peeyush Mahajan , Sushil K. Mishra , Rahul Datta , K. Narasimhan
{"title":"Effect of pre-straining on the forming limit of interstitial free high strength steel: Insights on microstructure and crystallographic texture evolution","authors":"Pavan Kumar ,&nbsp;Peeyush Mahajan ,&nbsp;Sushil K. Mishra ,&nbsp;Rahul Datta ,&nbsp;K. Narasimhan","doi":"10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.03.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the present work the forming behaviour and microstructure evolution of Interstitial free high strength (IFHS) steel have been investigated through Marciniak test (in-plane deformation) and miniature LDH test (out of plane deformation). Initially, the as-received IFHS steel sheet of 0.7 mm thickness has been deformed up to 2 % and 4 % strain in plane strain and biaxial condition through Marciniak test. Afterward, the miniature uniaxial, plane strain and biaxial specimens are fabricated from the bottom of the dome of the Marciniak test. The obtained samples are further deformed up to necking through miniature LDH test to generate the FLD. Thereafter, evolved microstructure has been investigated on the formed miniature samples at different strain levels and strain paths using electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) and x-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques. The improved formability is noted due to the impact of pre-strain (both plane strain and biaxial pre-straining) on forming limit diagrams. The 2 % plane strain pre-straining increased uniaxial, plane strain, and biaxial responses by 17.12 %, 64.73 %, and 131.28 %, respectively, while 4 % resulted in 13.36 %, 49.02 %, and 64.94 %. Similarly, 2 % biaxial pre-straining caused 6.18 %, 56.39 %, and 129.88 %, whereas 4 % led to 26.78 %, 67.81 %, and 83.05 % increased formability. The microstructural analysis revealed that after 4 % pre-straining, the development of misorientations (KAM, GAM) and GOS is nearly negligible compared to 2 % pre-straining. At 2 % pre-strain, the development of dense dislocation structures and sub-grain boundaries caused more localized deformation and misorientation formation, explaining the higher levels of misorientation. However, as the strain increased to 4 %, the dislocations began to rearrange, forming a more stable structure, which reduced the overall misorientation and its distribution. XRD bulk texture analysis revealed that an increase in the fraction of copper orientation resulted in lower misorientation values, as observed in the near-neck region of the 2 % pre-strained specimen in comparison to that of neck-region. Another notable observation from the plot is that when the material was deformed from as-received condition to pre-straining the increase in Brass and Goss orientations led to higher misorientation under both uniaxial and biaxial strain conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Processes","volume":"141 ","pages":"Pages 1499-1521"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manufacturing Processes","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526612525002804","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present work the forming behaviour and microstructure evolution of Interstitial free high strength (IFHS) steel have been investigated through Marciniak test (in-plane deformation) and miniature LDH test (out of plane deformation). Initially, the as-received IFHS steel sheet of 0.7 mm thickness has been deformed up to 2 % and 4 % strain in plane strain and biaxial condition through Marciniak test. Afterward, the miniature uniaxial, plane strain and biaxial specimens are fabricated from the bottom of the dome of the Marciniak test. The obtained samples are further deformed up to necking through miniature LDH test to generate the FLD. Thereafter, evolved microstructure has been investigated on the formed miniature samples at different strain levels and strain paths using electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) and x-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques. The improved formability is noted due to the impact of pre-strain (both plane strain and biaxial pre-straining) on forming limit diagrams. The 2 % plane strain pre-straining increased uniaxial, plane strain, and biaxial responses by 17.12 %, 64.73 %, and 131.28 %, respectively, while 4 % resulted in 13.36 %, 49.02 %, and 64.94 %. Similarly, 2 % biaxial pre-straining caused 6.18 %, 56.39 %, and 129.88 %, whereas 4 % led to 26.78 %, 67.81 %, and 83.05 % increased formability. The microstructural analysis revealed that after 4 % pre-straining, the development of misorientations (KAM, GAM) and GOS is nearly negligible compared to 2 % pre-straining. At 2 % pre-strain, the development of dense dislocation structures and sub-grain boundaries caused more localized deformation and misorientation formation, explaining the higher levels of misorientation. However, as the strain increased to 4 %, the dislocations began to rearrange, forming a more stable structure, which reduced the overall misorientation and its distribution. XRD bulk texture analysis revealed that an increase in the fraction of copper orientation resulted in lower misorientation values, as observed in the near-neck region of the 2 % pre-strained specimen in comparison to that of neck-region. Another notable observation from the plot is that when the material was deformed from as-received condition to pre-straining the increase in Brass and Goss orientations led to higher misorientation under both uniaxial and biaxial strain conditions.
预应变对间隙自由高强钢成形极限的影响:显微组织和结晶织构演变的启示
本文通过Marciniak试验(面内变形)和微型LDH试验(面外变形)研究了间隙自由高强钢的成形行为和组织演变。通过Marciniak试验,对0.7 mm厚的IFHS钢板在平面应变和双轴条件下分别进行了2%和4%的变形试验。然后,在Marciniak试验的穹顶底部制作单轴、平面应变和双轴微型试件。通过微型LDH试验,将得到的样品进一步变形至颈部,以产生FLD。然后,利用电子背散射衍射(EBSD)和x射线衍射(XRD)技术研究了在不同应变水平和应变路径下形成的微型样品的微观结构演变。由于预应变(平面应变和双轴预应变)对成形极限图的影响,可成形性得到了改善。2%平面应变预应变使单轴、平面应变和双轴响应分别提高17.12%、64.73%和131.28%,4%平面应变预应变使单轴、平面应变和双轴响应分别提高13.36%、49.02%和64.94%。同样,2%双轴预应变对成形性的影响分别为6.18%、56.39%和129.88%,而4%双轴预应变对成形性的影响分别为26.78%、67.81%和83.05%。微观结构分析表明,与2%的预应变相比,4%预应变后,取向偏差(KAM, GAM)和GOS的发展几乎可以忽略不计。在2%的预应变下,密集位错组织和亚晶界的发展导致了更多的局部变形和错取向形成,这解释了更高程度的错取向。然而,当应变增加到4%时,位错开始重新排列,形成更稳定的结构,从而减少了整体的错取向及其分布。XRD体织构分析表明,2%预应变试样的近颈区与颈区相比,铜取向分数的增加导致取向偏差值的降低。另一个值得注意的观察结果是,当材料从接收状态变形到预应变时,在单轴和双轴应变条件下,黄铜和高斯取向的增加导致了更高的取向偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Journal of Manufacturing Processes ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
11.30%
发文量
833
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Manufacturing Processes (JMP) is to exchange current and future directions of manufacturing processes research, development and implementation, and to publish archival scholarly literature with a view to advancing state-of-the-art manufacturing processes and encouraging innovation for developing new and efficient processes. The journal will also publish from other research communities for rapid communication of innovative new concepts. Special-topic issues on emerging technologies and invited papers will also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信