Implementation of a Competency-Based Training Program in Pediatric Surgery: A Pilot Study

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Rebecca Moreci , Brianna Spencer , Brian Fallon , Calista Harbaugh , Benjamin Zendejas , Brian W. Gray , Samuel Alaish , Jose Diaz-Miron , Peter Ehrlich , Samir Gadepalli , Erika Newman , Gurjit Sandhu , Ronald Hirschl
{"title":"Implementation of a Competency-Based Training Program in Pediatric Surgery: A Pilot Study","authors":"Rebecca Moreci ,&nbsp;Brianna Spencer ,&nbsp;Brian Fallon ,&nbsp;Calista Harbaugh ,&nbsp;Benjamin Zendejas ,&nbsp;Brian W. Gray ,&nbsp;Samuel Alaish ,&nbsp;Jose Diaz-Miron ,&nbsp;Peter Ehrlich ,&nbsp;Samir Gadepalli ,&nbsp;Erika Newman ,&nbsp;Gurjit Sandhu ,&nbsp;Ronald Hirschl","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Current surgical trainees experience less autonomy in their training than prior generations. Intentionally integrating graduated autonomy into the educational development of fellows would enhance trainee competence while providing the safety net of fellowship programming. The objective of this study was to pilot a competency-based training (CBT) approach for pediatric surgery fellowship programs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A CBT approach was developed at a single pediatric surgery fellowship program. Three goals were identified for the development of the CBT structure: 1) demonstrate flexibility for trainees to gain knowledge and skills at individualized paces, 2) readily identify and address knowledge gaps, and 3) facilitate increased autonomy for fellows while in training, in areas where competence has been successfully assessed. The CBT program consisted of five components: operative evaluations, a communication assessment tool (CAT), entrustable professional activities (EPAs), oral exams, and video reviews. Once a fellow completed the minimum requirements of each component, they proceeded to the final review at the clinical competency committee (CCC) meeting. For this pilot, we tracked the changes that were made to the program over the first few years as well as progression of the first six fellows and their participation in the various components.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between 2017 and 2023, six pediatric surgery fellows were evaluated by fourteen pediatric surgery faculty. Three fellows progressed through the pilot program with three procedures (Laparoscopic Appendectomy, Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair, and Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy), while the other three fellows progressed through the program with these three initial and two additional procedures (Laparoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement and Open Malrotation Repair). The median number of each component completed was: 5 CATs, 101 operative evaluations, 4 oral exams, and 3 video reviews. Fellows achieved competency for 1–4 procedures. From semi-structured interviews, fellows appeared overall satisfied with their experience of the CBT program, stating that these additional sets of tasks and requirements were a helpful thought exercise, provided an extra layer of structure to the curriculum, created a culture of independence and autonomy, and gave added purpose to the first year of training. The principal strength of the program was the structured format leading to graduated autonomy. All fellows reported feeling very prepared to move into a faculty role following graduation from fellowship training.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Competency-based training may allow for identification of specific gaps in knowledge, skills or abilities and support progressive autonomy among trainees prior to fellowship graduation. Generating further validity evidence and engaging in implementation research are necessary for quality improvement and dissemination of the program.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":"60 5","pages":"Article 162257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346825001022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Current surgical trainees experience less autonomy in their training than prior generations. Intentionally integrating graduated autonomy into the educational development of fellows would enhance trainee competence while providing the safety net of fellowship programming. The objective of this study was to pilot a competency-based training (CBT) approach for pediatric surgery fellowship programs.

Methods

A CBT approach was developed at a single pediatric surgery fellowship program. Three goals were identified for the development of the CBT structure: 1) demonstrate flexibility for trainees to gain knowledge and skills at individualized paces, 2) readily identify and address knowledge gaps, and 3) facilitate increased autonomy for fellows while in training, in areas where competence has been successfully assessed. The CBT program consisted of five components: operative evaluations, a communication assessment tool (CAT), entrustable professional activities (EPAs), oral exams, and video reviews. Once a fellow completed the minimum requirements of each component, they proceeded to the final review at the clinical competency committee (CCC) meeting. For this pilot, we tracked the changes that were made to the program over the first few years as well as progression of the first six fellows and their participation in the various components.

Results

Between 2017 and 2023, six pediatric surgery fellows were evaluated by fourteen pediatric surgery faculty. Three fellows progressed through the pilot program with three procedures (Laparoscopic Appendectomy, Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair, and Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy), while the other three fellows progressed through the program with these three initial and two additional procedures (Laparoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement and Open Malrotation Repair). The median number of each component completed was: 5 CATs, 101 operative evaluations, 4 oral exams, and 3 video reviews. Fellows achieved competency for 1–4 procedures. From semi-structured interviews, fellows appeared overall satisfied with their experience of the CBT program, stating that these additional sets of tasks and requirements were a helpful thought exercise, provided an extra layer of structure to the curriculum, created a culture of independence and autonomy, and gave added purpose to the first year of training. The principal strength of the program was the structured format leading to graduated autonomy. All fellows reported feeling very prepared to move into a faculty role following graduation from fellowship training.

Conclusion

Competency-based training may allow for identification of specific gaps in knowledge, skills or abilities and support progressive autonomy among trainees prior to fellowship graduation. Generating further validity evidence and engaging in implementation research are necessary for quality improvement and dissemination of the program.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信