Beneficios de un programa de rehabilitación pulmonar para pacientes con COVID persistente: impacto de la gravedad inicial, tiempo de evolución y forma de presentación en los resultados clínicos
C. Rodríguez-Hernández , A. Guillén-Solà , Y.G. Curbelo , R. Boza , C. Acuña-Pardo , M. Tejero-Sánchez
{"title":"Beneficios de un programa de rehabilitación pulmonar para pacientes con COVID persistente: impacto de la gravedad inicial, tiempo de evolución y forma de presentación en los resultados clínicos","authors":"C. Rodríguez-Hernández , A. Guillén-Solà , Y.G. Curbelo , R. Boza , C. Acuña-Pardo , M. Tejero-Sánchez","doi":"10.1016/j.rh.2025.100900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Two-thirds of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 experience persistent symptoms after infection.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To study the benefits of a respiratory rehabilitation program (RRP) in patients with long COVID and compare the results based on the time of evolution and clinical presentation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Post-hoc analysis of a prospective cohort of patients with long COVID. Changes were evaluated using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (maxIP and maxEP), and peripheral muscle strength. Statistical tests used: Chi-square, paired and independent t-Student tests, one-way ANOVA, and a general linear model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 158 patients referred to rehabilitation, 110 (mean age 58.1<!--> <!-->years; 57.3% women) started the RRP. After the intervention, significant improvements were observed: a reduction of 0.8 points (95%<!--> <span>C</span>I<span>:</span> −1.1 to −0.6) on the mMRC dyspnea scale, an increase of 19.6<!--> <!-->m (95%<!--> <!-->CI: −0.8 to 39.9) in the 6MWT, 16.8<!--> <!-->cmH<sub>2</sub>O (95%<!--> <!-->CI: 10.3 to 23.2) in maxIP, 22.5<!--> <!-->cmH<sub>2</sub>O (95%<!--> <!-->CI: 15.3 to 29.7) in maxEP, and 5.0<!--> <!-->kg (95%<!--> <!-->CI: 3.3 to 6.7) in quadriceps strength. Although these improvements were independent of infection onset and disease duration, patients from the first wave showed more modest improvements.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The RRP provides clinical and functional benefits for patients with long COVID, regardless of disease duration and initial severity of infection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39532,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitacion","volume":"59 2","pages":"Article 100900"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048712025000209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Two-thirds of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 experience persistent symptoms after infection.
Objectives
To study the benefits of a respiratory rehabilitation program (RRP) in patients with long COVID and compare the results based on the time of evolution and clinical presentation.
Methods
Post-hoc analysis of a prospective cohort of patients with long COVID. Changes were evaluated using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (maxIP and maxEP), and peripheral muscle strength. Statistical tests used: Chi-square, paired and independent t-Student tests, one-way ANOVA, and a general linear model.
Results
Out of 158 patients referred to rehabilitation, 110 (mean age 58.1 years; 57.3% women) started the RRP. After the intervention, significant improvements were observed: a reduction of 0.8 points (95% CI: −1.1 to −0.6) on the mMRC dyspnea scale, an increase of 19.6 m (95% CI: −0.8 to 39.9) in the 6MWT, 16.8 cmH2O (95% CI: 10.3 to 23.2) in maxIP, 22.5 cmH2O (95% CI: 15.3 to 29.7) in maxEP, and 5.0 kg (95% CI: 3.3 to 6.7) in quadriceps strength. Although these improvements were independent of infection onset and disease duration, patients from the first wave showed more modest improvements.
Conclusions
The RRP provides clinical and functional benefits for patients with long COVID, regardless of disease duration and initial severity of infection.
期刊介绍:
La revista que es desde hace más de 40 años la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Rehabilitación y referente de la mayoría de las Sociedades de la Especialidad de los países americanos de habla hispana. Se publican 5 números pluritemáticos al año y uno monográfico sobre un tema del mayor interés y actualidad designado por el consejo de redacción.