Beneficios de un programa de rehabilitación pulmonar para pacientes con COVID persistente: impacto de la gravedad inicial, tiempo de evolución y forma de presentación en los resultados clínicos

Q3 Medicine
C. Rodríguez-Hernández , A. Guillén-Solà , Y.G. Curbelo , R. Boza , C. Acuña-Pardo , M. Tejero-Sánchez
{"title":"Beneficios de un programa de rehabilitación pulmonar para pacientes con COVID persistente: impacto de la gravedad inicial, tiempo de evolución y forma de presentación en los resultados clínicos","authors":"C. Rodríguez-Hernández ,&nbsp;A. Guillén-Solà ,&nbsp;Y.G. Curbelo ,&nbsp;R. Boza ,&nbsp;C. Acuña-Pardo ,&nbsp;M. Tejero-Sánchez","doi":"10.1016/j.rh.2025.100900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Two-thirds of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 experience persistent symptoms after infection.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To study the benefits of a respiratory rehabilitation program (RRP) in patients with long COVID and compare the results based on the time of evolution and clinical presentation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Post-hoc analysis of a prospective cohort of patients with long COVID. Changes were evaluated using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (maxIP and maxEP), and peripheral muscle strength. Statistical tests used: Chi-square, paired and independent t-Student tests, one-way ANOVA, and a general linear model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 158 patients referred to rehabilitation, 110 (mean age 58.1<!--> <!-->years; 57.3% women) started the RRP. After the intervention, significant improvements were observed: a reduction of 0.8 points (95%<!--> <span>C</span>I<span>:</span> −1.1 to −0.6) on the mMRC dyspnea scale, an increase of 19.6<!--> <!-->m (95%<!--> <!-->CI: −0.8 to 39.9) in the 6MWT, 16.8<!--> <!-->cmH<sub>2</sub>O (95%<!--> <!-->CI: 10.3 to 23.2) in maxIP, 22.5<!--> <!-->cmH<sub>2</sub>O (95%<!--> <!-->CI: 15.3 to 29.7) in maxEP, and 5.0<!--> <!-->kg (95%<!--> <!-->CI: 3.3 to 6.7) in quadriceps strength. Although these improvements were independent of infection onset and disease duration, patients from the first wave showed more modest improvements.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The RRP provides clinical and functional benefits for patients with long COVID, regardless of disease duration and initial severity of infection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39532,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitacion","volume":"59 2","pages":"Article 100900"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048712025000209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Two-thirds of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 experience persistent symptoms after infection.

Objectives

To study the benefits of a respiratory rehabilitation program (RRP) in patients with long COVID and compare the results based on the time of evolution and clinical presentation.

Methods

Post-hoc analysis of a prospective cohort of patients with long COVID. Changes were evaluated using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (maxIP and maxEP), and peripheral muscle strength. Statistical tests used: Chi-square, paired and independent t-Student tests, one-way ANOVA, and a general linear model.

Results

Out of 158 patients referred to rehabilitation, 110 (mean age 58.1 years; 57.3% women) started the RRP. After the intervention, significant improvements were observed: a reduction of 0.8 points (95% CI: −1.1 to −0.6) on the mMRC dyspnea scale, an increase of 19.6 m (95% CI: −0.8 to 39.9) in the 6MWT, 16.8 cmH2O (95% CI: 10.3 to 23.2) in maxIP, 22.5 cmH2O (95% CI: 15.3 to 29.7) in maxEP, and 5.0 kg (95% CI: 3.3 to 6.7) in quadriceps strength. Although these improvements were independent of infection onset and disease duration, patients from the first wave showed more modest improvements.

Conclusions

The RRP provides clinical and functional benefits for patients with long COVID, regardless of disease duration and initial severity of infection.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rehabilitacion
Rehabilitacion Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: La revista que es desde hace más de 40 años la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Rehabilitación y referente de la mayoría de las Sociedades de la Especialidad de los países americanos de habla hispana. Se publican 5 números pluritemáticos al año y uno monográfico sobre un tema del mayor interés y actualidad designado por el consejo de redacción.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信