More money, more questions: How caregivers spent the expanded child tax credit

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
C.Ross Hatton , Adam S. Levine , Keshia M. Pollack Porter , Erin R. Hager
{"title":"More money, more questions: How caregivers spent the expanded child tax credit","authors":"C.Ross Hatton ,&nbsp;Adam S. Levine ,&nbsp;Keshia M. Pollack Porter ,&nbsp;Erin R. Hager","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In 2021, the federal government passed a one-year expanded child tax credit (ECTC), which increased the credit’s amount, made it fully refundable, and issued half of the credit as monthly payments to households with children. This policy, with its wide income-eligibility, can be used to better understand how families use cash benefits, as well as how those uses and related decision-making processes vary by financial context. This explanatory sequential mixed methods study uses survey and interview data to examine how caregivers of varying income levels living in Maryland used the funds and the factors shaping those decisions. We surveyed 306 caregivers between November 2022 and February 2023 about their receipt and use of the child tax credit. We then used stratified purposeful sampling to recruit 22 caregivers from three income groups (&lt;185 %, 185 %-300 %, and 300 %+ of the federal poverty line) for interviews between March and June 2023. We used descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, and thematic content analysis to identify how caregivers used the funds, explore variation by income, and described factors shaping ECTC use. Caregivers often reported using the funds for necessities like food and utilities; however, many caregivers—particularly those with higher incomes— also used the funds for debt payments and savings and investments. Financial context (e.g., job and income loss) played a paramount role in both constraining and explaining how caregivers used the funds; however, other factors like family structure, benefit timing, payment structure, and the ECTC’s framing as a child benefit were also described as factors that shaped caregivers’ decisions. The household and policy level factors identified in this study reveal important insights into how the structure and implementation of policies like the ECTC might shape how they are used, as well as how the ECTC’s wide income-eligibility might have impacted health equity across financial contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 108231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925001148","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2021, the federal government passed a one-year expanded child tax credit (ECTC), which increased the credit’s amount, made it fully refundable, and issued half of the credit as monthly payments to households with children. This policy, with its wide income-eligibility, can be used to better understand how families use cash benefits, as well as how those uses and related decision-making processes vary by financial context. This explanatory sequential mixed methods study uses survey and interview data to examine how caregivers of varying income levels living in Maryland used the funds and the factors shaping those decisions. We surveyed 306 caregivers between November 2022 and February 2023 about their receipt and use of the child tax credit. We then used stratified purposeful sampling to recruit 22 caregivers from three income groups (<185 %, 185 %-300 %, and 300 %+ of the federal poverty line) for interviews between March and June 2023. We used descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, and thematic content analysis to identify how caregivers used the funds, explore variation by income, and described factors shaping ECTC use. Caregivers often reported using the funds for necessities like food and utilities; however, many caregivers—particularly those with higher incomes— also used the funds for debt payments and savings and investments. Financial context (e.g., job and income loss) played a paramount role in both constraining and explaining how caregivers used the funds; however, other factors like family structure, benefit timing, payment structure, and the ECTC’s framing as a child benefit were also described as factors that shaped caregivers’ decisions. The household and policy level factors identified in this study reveal important insights into how the structure and implementation of policies like the ECTC might shape how they are used, as well as how the ECTC’s wide income-eligibility might have impacted health equity across financial contexts.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信