Dark side of green subsidies: Do green subsidies to a focal firm crowd out peers’ green innovation?

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Xuemei Xie, Mengge Wang
{"title":"Dark side of green subsidies: Do green subsidies to a focal firm crowd out peers’ green innovation?","authors":"Xuemei Xie,&nbsp;Mengge Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many studies have shown that green subsidies can promote green innovation in recipient firms, but the impact of green subsidies to a focal firm on peer firms' green innovation remains understudied. To fill in this research gap, the current study uses data from 2,155 listed Chinese manufacturing firms and a multi-period difference-in differences approach to examine the impact of green subsidies to a focal firm on peer firms' green innovation. We find that such subsidies negatively affect peer firms' green innovation. Thereafter, we use the attention-based view to examine the role of regulatory focus (promotion and prevention focus) in the relationship between green subsidies and peer green innovation. We find that peer firms' promotion focus weakens the negative effect of green subsidies to a focal firm on peer green innovation, whereas peer firms' prevention focus aggravates this effect. Moreover, we examine the competitive mechanism through which green subsidies to a focal firm crowd out peer green innovation, finding that the crowding-out effect is more pronounced in peer firms with higher market concentration and greater product market share. We likewise investigate the heterogeneous effects of firm, industry, and regional characteristics on the relationship between green subsidies and peer green innovation. Results indicate that green subsidies to state-owned firms, mature firms, high-tech firms, and firms located in pilot low-carbon cities have considerably strong negative effects on peer green innovation. Our study challenges the prevailing view of environmental regulations' positive spillover effects on peer green innovation by highlighting green subsidies' “dark side.” We reveal the crowding-out effect of green subsidies to focal firms on peer green innovation, stimulating scholarly debate on their effectiveness and providing important implications for environmental policies’ enactment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 103221"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225000537","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many studies have shown that green subsidies can promote green innovation in recipient firms, but the impact of green subsidies to a focal firm on peer firms' green innovation remains understudied. To fill in this research gap, the current study uses data from 2,155 listed Chinese manufacturing firms and a multi-period difference-in differences approach to examine the impact of green subsidies to a focal firm on peer firms' green innovation. We find that such subsidies negatively affect peer firms' green innovation. Thereafter, we use the attention-based view to examine the role of regulatory focus (promotion and prevention focus) in the relationship between green subsidies and peer green innovation. We find that peer firms' promotion focus weakens the negative effect of green subsidies to a focal firm on peer green innovation, whereas peer firms' prevention focus aggravates this effect. Moreover, we examine the competitive mechanism through which green subsidies to a focal firm crowd out peer green innovation, finding that the crowding-out effect is more pronounced in peer firms with higher market concentration and greater product market share. We likewise investigate the heterogeneous effects of firm, industry, and regional characteristics on the relationship between green subsidies and peer green innovation. Results indicate that green subsidies to state-owned firms, mature firms, high-tech firms, and firms located in pilot low-carbon cities have considerably strong negative effects on peer green innovation. Our study challenges the prevailing view of environmental regulations' positive spillover effects on peer green innovation by highlighting green subsidies' “dark side.” We reveal the crowding-out effect of green subsidies to focal firms on peer green innovation, stimulating scholarly debate on their effectiveness and providing important implications for environmental policies’ enactment.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信