Integrating sustainability into helix models for eco-innovation: The eco-5HM

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Bart J.A. van Bueren , Mark A.A.M. Leenders , Kevin Argus , Weng Marc Lim , Usha Iyer-Raniga , Alvedi Sabani
{"title":"Integrating sustainability into helix models for eco-innovation: The eco-5HM","authors":"Bart J.A. van Bueren ,&nbsp;Mark A.A.M. Leenders ,&nbsp;Kevin Argus ,&nbsp;Weng Marc Lim ,&nbsp;Usha Iyer-Raniga ,&nbsp;Alvedi Sabani","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While helix models facilitate stakeholder collaborations among academia, government, and industry (triple helix model: 3HM) and often extend to include civil society (quadruple helix model: 4HM) and the natural ecosystem (quintuple helix model: 5HM), their effectiveness in promoting eco-innovation remains unclear. This ambiguity highlights the need to examine and, if necessary, refine the helix model to achieve strong sustainability outcomes. A systematic review of 153 publications linking helix models with sustainability was conducted to provide an overview. Taxonomy scoring indicates that the relationships between helix models and sustainability are <em>unstable</em> due to a limited corpus size compared to the helix literature, <em>narrow</em> because they fail to encompass a comprehensive sustainability system, and <em>shallow</em> by lacking representative targets, priorities, and indicators, as most helix studies address sustainability in a superficial manner. To address this gap, a critical review of 37 high-performing publications was conducted to unpack their contributions to eco-innovation ecosystems. These contributions informed the development of a consolidated and improved helix model, known as eco-5HM, incorporating eight key sustainability concepts and 18 strategic stakeholder relations as drivers to provide a strong focus on sustainability within helix-based innovation ecosystems. The present review therefore offers valuable insights for academics, practitioners, and policymakers on developing eco-innovation ecosystems for the benefit of all stakeholders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 103211"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225000434","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While helix models facilitate stakeholder collaborations among academia, government, and industry (triple helix model: 3HM) and often extend to include civil society (quadruple helix model: 4HM) and the natural ecosystem (quintuple helix model: 5HM), their effectiveness in promoting eco-innovation remains unclear. This ambiguity highlights the need to examine and, if necessary, refine the helix model to achieve strong sustainability outcomes. A systematic review of 153 publications linking helix models with sustainability was conducted to provide an overview. Taxonomy scoring indicates that the relationships between helix models and sustainability are unstable due to a limited corpus size compared to the helix literature, narrow because they fail to encompass a comprehensive sustainability system, and shallow by lacking representative targets, priorities, and indicators, as most helix studies address sustainability in a superficial manner. To address this gap, a critical review of 37 high-performing publications was conducted to unpack their contributions to eco-innovation ecosystems. These contributions informed the development of a consolidated and improved helix model, known as eco-5HM, incorporating eight key sustainability concepts and 18 strategic stakeholder relations as drivers to provide a strong focus on sustainability within helix-based innovation ecosystems. The present review therefore offers valuable insights for academics, practitioners, and policymakers on developing eco-innovation ecosystems for the benefit of all stakeholders.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信