Neighbourhood differences in the rates of criminal cautions and convictions for children in the care system

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
A. Leyland , C.J.R Webb , M.R. Bennett , N. Hughes
{"title":"Neighbourhood differences in the rates of criminal cautions and convictions for children in the care system","authors":"A. Leyland ,&nbsp;C.J.R Webb ,&nbsp;M.R. Bennett ,&nbsp;N. Hughes","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The disproportionate criminalisation of children in the care system is well-recognised globally. The likelihood of this criminalisation is influenced by place-based differences in the practices of child welfare and criminal justice services. Administrative data for a cohort of children in England (<em>N =</em> 1,708,570) was analysed at the level of the local authority (n = 152). The present study reports that for children across tiers of the child welfare service (e.g., out of home placements or supported at home by a social worker) there was substantial variation between local authorities in the rates of criminal cautions or convictions such that some local authorities had rates that were up to three times greater than other authorities. This difference was found after adjusting for the local authority conviction rate in the general population and the deprivation rate. There is an urgent need to address this inequity through better understanding of what underpins these differences and from the sharing of best practices to improve outcomes for our most vulnerable children.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 108243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925001264","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The disproportionate criminalisation of children in the care system is well-recognised globally. The likelihood of this criminalisation is influenced by place-based differences in the practices of child welfare and criminal justice services. Administrative data for a cohort of children in England (N = 1,708,570) was analysed at the level of the local authority (n = 152). The present study reports that for children across tiers of the child welfare service (e.g., out of home placements or supported at home by a social worker) there was substantial variation between local authorities in the rates of criminal cautions or convictions such that some local authorities had rates that were up to three times greater than other authorities. This difference was found after adjusting for the local authority conviction rate in the general population and the deprivation rate. There is an urgent need to address this inequity through better understanding of what underpins these differences and from the sharing of best practices to improve outcomes for our most vulnerable children.
邻里之间在儿童看护系统的刑事警告和定罪率上的差异
在全球范围内,看护系统中对儿童的不成比例的刑事定罪是公认的。这种定罪的可能性受到儿童福利和刑事司法服务做法的地方差异的影响。对英格兰一组儿童(N = 1,708,570)的行政数据在地方当局(N = 152)进行了分析。本研究报告指出,对于不同层次的儿童福利服务(例如,离家安置或由社会工作者在家照顾),地方当局之间在刑事警告或定罪率方面存在很大差异,一些地方当局的比率比其他当局高出三倍。这一差异是在对地方当局在一般人群中的定罪率和剥夺率进行调整后发现的。迫切需要通过更好地了解这些差异的根源,并通过分享最佳做法来改善我们最弱势儿童的结果,来解决这种不平等现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信