Shuhui Sun , Jiajia Jin , Jie Chen , Kaiwen Wang , Wanlong Wu , Xiaodong Wang , Yanyan Song , Shuang Ye
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies versus csDMARDs in anti-Jo-1 antisynthetase syndrome: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Shuhui Sun , Jiajia Jin , Jie Chen , Kaiwen Wang , Wanlong Wu , Xiaodong Wang , Yanyan Song , Shuang Ye","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Anti-Jo-1 antisynthetase syndrome (Jo1<sup>+</sup>ASyS) is the most common form of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy with high relapse rates and limited treatment options beyond csDMARDs, which frequently fail to achieve adequate disease control. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (CD20mAbs) compared to conventional synthetic(cs) DMARDs in patients with Jo1<sup>+</sup>ASyS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-center retrospective cohort of patients with Jo1<sup>+</sup>ASyS were collected at RenJi Hospital in China (2007–2023). A prevalent new-user design with time-based propensity scores, applied without replacement, was used to match CD20mAb and csDMARD users. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients reaching Low Disease Activity (5-item LDA), as defined by the absence of active arthritis, myositis, ILD, fever, and prednisone dosage ≤7.5 mg/day.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 166 eligible treatment regimens, including CD20mAbs and csDMARDs, were extracted from 128 Jo1<sup>+</sup>ASyS patients with a median follow-up period of 5 years. Utilizing propensity score, 49 pairs of individual prescriptions for CD20mAbs and csDMARDs users were matched. The group treated with CD20mAbs exhibited a significantly higher rate of achieving LDA compared to those treated with csDMARDs (46.9 % vs. 22.4 %, <em>p</em> = 0.011). No significant differences in exposure-adjusted incidence rate were detected between the two treatment modalities (CD20mAbs vs. csDMARDs = 7.911 vs. 6.479 per 100 patient-yr, RR = 1.22; 95 % CI: 0.64, 2.36), with respect to major infections. Sensitivity analyses further confirmed the robustness of the superior effectiveness of the CD20mAbs compared to the csDMARDs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CD20mAbs exhibited remarkable treatment efficacy and acceptable safety in patients with Jo1<sup>+</sup>ASyS. Cumulative evidence, including ours suggested that CD20mAbs should be considered as a first-line option for Jo1<sup>+</sup>ASyS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 152712"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017225000836","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Anti-Jo-1 antisynthetase syndrome (Jo1+ASyS) is the most common form of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy with high relapse rates and limited treatment options beyond csDMARDs, which frequently fail to achieve adequate disease control. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (CD20mAbs) compared to conventional synthetic(cs) DMARDs in patients with Jo1+ASyS.
Methods
A single-center retrospective cohort of patients with Jo1+ASyS were collected at RenJi Hospital in China (2007–2023). A prevalent new-user design with time-based propensity scores, applied without replacement, was used to match CD20mAb and csDMARD users. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients reaching Low Disease Activity (5-item LDA), as defined by the absence of active arthritis, myositis, ILD, fever, and prednisone dosage ≤7.5 mg/day.
Results
A total of 166 eligible treatment regimens, including CD20mAbs and csDMARDs, were extracted from 128 Jo1+ASyS patients with a median follow-up period of 5 years. Utilizing propensity score, 49 pairs of individual prescriptions for CD20mAbs and csDMARDs users were matched. The group treated with CD20mAbs exhibited a significantly higher rate of achieving LDA compared to those treated with csDMARDs (46.9 % vs. 22.4 %, p = 0.011). No significant differences in exposure-adjusted incidence rate were detected between the two treatment modalities (CD20mAbs vs. csDMARDs = 7.911 vs. 6.479 per 100 patient-yr, RR = 1.22; 95 % CI: 0.64, 2.36), with respect to major infections. Sensitivity analyses further confirmed the robustness of the superior effectiveness of the CD20mAbs compared to the csDMARDs.
Conclusion
CD20mAbs exhibited remarkable treatment efficacy and acceptable safety in patients with Jo1+ASyS. Cumulative evidence, including ours suggested that CD20mAbs should be considered as a first-line option for Jo1+ASyS.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.