Perspective on compressed CO2 regenerative braking systems for passenger cars

Alberto Boretti
{"title":"Perspective on compressed CO2 regenerative braking systems for passenger cars","authors":"Alberto Boretti","doi":"10.1016/j.prime.2025.100970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing demand for energy-efficient and sustainable transportation has led to significant advancements in regenerative braking systems (RBS), which recover and reuse kinetic energy lost during braking. While battery-based RBS dominate the market, alternative technologies such as pneumatic regenerative braking systems (PRBS) offer simpler, cost-effective, and more durable solutions, particularly for heavy-duty and commercial vehicles. This study investigates the feasibility of using compressed carbon dioxide (CO₂RBS) as a working fluid in PRBS, specifically in hybrid vehicles powered by hydrogen internal combustion engines. A comparative analysis is conducted between CO₂RBS and battery RBS, evaluating their efficiency, energy density, lifecycle sustainability, and real-world applicability. The study also revisits Peugeot Citroën's Hybrid Air Technology to assess its potential role in advancing CO₂-based RBS solutions. Simulation-based efficiency comparisons across various driving cycles (WLTP, NEDC, and a custom urban cycle) reveal that CO₂RBS achieves round-trip efficiencies ranging from 45 % to 60 %, compared to 70 % to 85 % for typical battery RBS. Despite this lower efficiency, CO₂RBS offers significant advantages: projected system costs are 30 % to 50 % lower, recyclability is estimated at over 95 % of system components (compared to estimated 50 % for typical battery with current technologies), and preliminary lifecycle emission analysis suggests a potential reduction of 15 % to 25 % compared to lithium-ion battery-based systems, depending on the electricity generation mix. The findings indicate that CO₂RBS could be a viable alternative for cost-sensitive and environmentally conscious applications, particularly in sectors prioritizing robust, maintenance-friendly, and recyclable energy storage solutions. By addressing the material sustainability challenges associated with lithium-ion batteries, this research highlights CO₂RBS as a promising pathway toward more sustainable regenerative braking solutions for future transportation systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100488,"journal":{"name":"e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100970"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772671125000774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing demand for energy-efficient and sustainable transportation has led to significant advancements in regenerative braking systems (RBS), which recover and reuse kinetic energy lost during braking. While battery-based RBS dominate the market, alternative technologies such as pneumatic regenerative braking systems (PRBS) offer simpler, cost-effective, and more durable solutions, particularly for heavy-duty and commercial vehicles. This study investigates the feasibility of using compressed carbon dioxide (CO₂RBS) as a working fluid in PRBS, specifically in hybrid vehicles powered by hydrogen internal combustion engines. A comparative analysis is conducted between CO₂RBS and battery RBS, evaluating their efficiency, energy density, lifecycle sustainability, and real-world applicability. The study also revisits Peugeot Citroën's Hybrid Air Technology to assess its potential role in advancing CO₂-based RBS solutions. Simulation-based efficiency comparisons across various driving cycles (WLTP, NEDC, and a custom urban cycle) reveal that CO₂RBS achieves round-trip efficiencies ranging from 45 % to 60 %, compared to 70 % to 85 % for typical battery RBS. Despite this lower efficiency, CO₂RBS offers significant advantages: projected system costs are 30 % to 50 % lower, recyclability is estimated at over 95 % of system components (compared to estimated 50 % for typical battery with current technologies), and preliminary lifecycle emission analysis suggests a potential reduction of 15 % to 25 % compared to lithium-ion battery-based systems, depending on the electricity generation mix. The findings indicate that CO₂RBS could be a viable alternative for cost-sensitive and environmentally conscious applications, particularly in sectors prioritizing robust, maintenance-friendly, and recyclable energy storage solutions. By addressing the material sustainability challenges associated with lithium-ion batteries, this research highlights CO₂RBS as a promising pathway toward more sustainable regenerative braking solutions for future transportation systems.
乘用车压缩二氧化碳再生制动系统的展望
对节能和可持续交通的需求不断增长,导致再生制动系统(RBS)取得了重大进展,该系统可以回收和再利用制动过程中损失的动能。在以电池为基础的RBS主导市场的同时,气动再生制动系统(PRBS)等替代技术提供了更简单、更经济、更耐用的解决方案,尤其适用于重型和商用车。本研究探讨了压缩二氧化碳(CO₂RBS)作为PRBS工作流体的可行性,特别是在氢内燃机驱动的混合动力汽车中。对CO₂RBS和电池RBS进行了对比分析,评估了它们的效率、能量密度、生命周期可持续性和实际适用性。该研究还回顾了标致Citroën的混合空气技术,以评估其在推进基于二氧化碳的RBS解决方案中的潜在作用。基于仿真的各种驾驶循环(WLTP、NEDC和定制城市循环)效率比较显示,CO₂RBS的往返效率范围为45%至60%,而典型电池RBS的往返效率为70%至85%。尽管效率较低,但CO₂RBS具有显著的优势:预计系统成本降低30%至50%,系统组件的可回收性估计超过95%(与当前技术的典型电池估计为50%相比),初步的生命周期排放分析表明,与基于锂离子电池的系统相比,根据发电组合,可能减少15%至25%。研究结果表明,对于成本敏感和环保的应用来说,二氧化碳RBS可能是一种可行的替代方案,特别是在那些优先考虑强大、维护友好和可回收的储能解决方案的行业。通过解决与锂离子电池相关的材料可持续性挑战,该研究强调了CO₂RBS是未来交通系统实现更可持续再生制动解决方案的有希望的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信