Preserving meaning of evidence from evolving systems

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Hannes Spichiger , Frank Adelstein
{"title":"Preserving meaning of evidence from evolving systems","authors":"Hannes Spichiger ,&nbsp;Frank Adelstein","doi":"10.1016/j.fsidi.2025.301867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Preservation is generally considered as the step in the forensic process that stops evidence from decaying. In this paper, we argue that the traditional scope of preservation in digital forensic science, focused on the trace, is not sufficient to ensure the stop of decay in the context of evolving systems. Instead, insufficiently preserved reference material may lead to the loss of meaning, resulting in an overall increase of uncertainty in the presented evidence. An expanded definition of Preservation and a definition of Reference Data are proposed. We present suggestions for future avenues of research of ways to preserve reference data in order to avoid a loss of meaning of the trace data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48481,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 301867"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266628172500006X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preservation is generally considered as the step in the forensic process that stops evidence from decaying. In this paper, we argue that the traditional scope of preservation in digital forensic science, focused on the trace, is not sufficient to ensure the stop of decay in the context of evolving systems. Instead, insufficiently preserved reference material may lead to the loss of meaning, resulting in an overall increase of uncertainty in the presented evidence. An expanded definition of Preservation and a definition of Reference Data are proposed. We present suggestions for future avenues of research of ways to preserve reference data in order to avoid a loss of meaning of the trace data.
保存进化系统证据的意义
保存通常被认为是法医程序中防止证据腐烂的步骤。在本文中,我们认为,传统的数字法医科学的保存范围,集中在痕迹,是不足以确保在不断发展的系统背景下停止腐烂。相反,保存不充分的参考材料可能导致失去意义,从而导致所提供证据的不确定性总体增加。提出了保存的扩展定义和参考数据的定义。我们提出建议,为今后的研究途径,如何保存参考数据,以避免丢失的意义的踪迹数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信