Beyond the dictionary attack: Enhancing password cracking efficiency through machine learning-induced mangling rules

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Radek Hranický, Lucia Šírová, Viktor Rucký
{"title":"Beyond the dictionary attack: Enhancing password cracking efficiency through machine learning-induced mangling rules","authors":"Radek Hranický,&nbsp;Lucia Šírová,&nbsp;Viktor Rucký","doi":"10.1016/j.fsidi.2025.301865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the realm of digital forensics, password recovery is a critical task, with dictionary attacks representing one of the oldest yet most effective methods. To increase the attack power, developers of cracking tools have introduced password-mangling rules that apply modifications to the dictionary entries such as character swapping, substitution, or capitalization. Despite several attempts to automate rule creation that have been proposed over the years, creating a suitable ruleset is still a significant challenge. The current research lacks a deeper comparison and evaluation of the individual methods and their implications. We present RuleForge, a machine learning-based mangling-rule generator that leverages four clustering techniques and 19 commands with configurable priorities. Key innovations include an extended command set, advanced cluster representative selection, and various performance optimizations. We conduct extensive experiments on real-world datasets, evaluating clustering-based methods in terms of time, memory use, and hit ratios. Additionally, we compare RuleForge to existing rule-creation tools, password-cracking solutions, and popular existing rulesets. Our solution with an improved MDBSCAN clustering method achieves up to an 11.67%pt. Higher hit ratio than the original method and also outperformed the best yet-known state-of-the-art solutions for automated rule creation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48481,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 301865"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666281725000046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the realm of digital forensics, password recovery is a critical task, with dictionary attacks representing one of the oldest yet most effective methods. To increase the attack power, developers of cracking tools have introduced password-mangling rules that apply modifications to the dictionary entries such as character swapping, substitution, or capitalization. Despite several attempts to automate rule creation that have been proposed over the years, creating a suitable ruleset is still a significant challenge. The current research lacks a deeper comparison and evaluation of the individual methods and their implications. We present RuleForge, a machine learning-based mangling-rule generator that leverages four clustering techniques and 19 commands with configurable priorities. Key innovations include an extended command set, advanced cluster representative selection, and various performance optimizations. We conduct extensive experiments on real-world datasets, evaluating clustering-based methods in terms of time, memory use, and hit ratios. Additionally, we compare RuleForge to existing rule-creation tools, password-cracking solutions, and popular existing rulesets. Our solution with an improved MDBSCAN clustering method achieves up to an 11.67%pt. Higher hit ratio than the original method and also outperformed the best yet-known state-of-the-art solutions for automated rule creation.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信