Differences in perceived social connection help explain SES-based gaps in well-being

IF 2.9 2区社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY

Social Networks Pub Date : 2025-03-23 DOI:10.1016/j.socnet.2025.03.004

Wicia M. Fang , Andrea Courtney , Matthew O. Jackson , Jamil Zaki

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low socioeconomic status (SES) undergraduates are often worse off in well-being than high-SES peers. These “well-being gaps” lessen when low-SES students self-report being socially connected; however, one’s perception of their own connectedness in a network differs from external proxies. Within a network of 785 undergraduates, we examine two social network measures of connection—self-reported number of friends (outdegree) and number of undergraduate peers who reported them as a friend (indegree). Low- (vs. high-) SES students have a lower outdegree yet have a similar indegree. Critically, low-SES students who report a lower outdegree are also poorer in well-being, even when controlling for indegree, though the effect is small. This work underlines the perception of connection.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Social Networks Multiple-

CiteScore

5.90

自引率

12.90%

发文量

118

期刊介绍： Social Networks is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly. It provides a common forum for representatives of anthropology, sociology, history, social psychology, political science, human geography, biology, economics, communications science and other disciplines who share an interest in the study of the empirical structure of social relations and associations that may be expressed in network form. It publishes both theoretical and substantive papers. Critical reviews of major theoretical or methodological approaches using the notion of networks in the analysis of social behaviour are also included, as are reviews of recent books dealing with social networks and social structure.