Developing robust machine learning techniques to predict oil recovery: A comprehensive field and experimental study

0 ENERGY & FUELS
Wahib Yahya , Yang Baolin , Ayman Mutahar AlRassas , Wang Yuting , Harith Al-Khafaji , Riadh Al Dawood
{"title":"Developing robust machine learning techniques to predict oil recovery: A comprehensive field and experimental study","authors":"Wahib Yahya ,&nbsp;Yang Baolin ,&nbsp;Ayman Mutahar AlRassas ,&nbsp;Wang Yuting ,&nbsp;Harith Al-Khafaji ,&nbsp;Riadh Al Dawood","doi":"10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The volatility in the oil industry driven by significant market demand and notable resource reduction, underscores the crucial requirement for developing a reliable and robust framework to promote oil recovery strategy. This study integrated various robust Machine Learning (ML) algorithms including the Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) to predict oil recovery based on field and experimental data. Leveraging these models enhances prediction efficiency and reduces reliance on traditional methods. The performance of the integrated ML models with oilfield and experimental datasets, as well as the impact of multiple input parameters against traditional decline curve analysis (DCA) models, was evaluated. The findings reveal that RF, DT, and GBR models have achieved remarkable performance in contrast with other ML models and traditional DCA methods. The RF model has achieved the highest performance, reflected by a coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) value of 0.99 for both field Datasets (A) and experimental Datasets (B). More so, we accurately assess the ML model's robustness and performance by leveraging various metrics performance, including the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), to prove the robust alignment with a remarkable merit of accuracy and complexity across the integrated ML models. Ultimately, the results supported the RF model, which obtained the lowest AIC and BIC values among all the models for oil recovery prediction in Datasets (A) and (B).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100578,"journal":{"name":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","volume":"250 ","pages":"Article 213853"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891025002118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The volatility in the oil industry driven by significant market demand and notable resource reduction, underscores the crucial requirement for developing a reliable and robust framework to promote oil recovery strategy. This study integrated various robust Machine Learning (ML) algorithms including the Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) to predict oil recovery based on field and experimental data. Leveraging these models enhances prediction efficiency and reduces reliance on traditional methods. The performance of the integrated ML models with oilfield and experimental datasets, as well as the impact of multiple input parameters against traditional decline curve analysis (DCA) models, was evaluated. The findings reveal that RF, DT, and GBR models have achieved remarkable performance in contrast with other ML models and traditional DCA methods. The RF model has achieved the highest performance, reflected by a coefficient of determination (R2) value of 0.99 for both field Datasets (A) and experimental Datasets (B). More so, we accurately assess the ML model's robustness and performance by leveraging various metrics performance, including the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), to prove the robust alignment with a remarkable merit of accuracy and complexity across the integrated ML models. Ultimately, the results supported the RF model, which obtained the lowest AIC and BIC values among all the models for oil recovery prediction in Datasets (A) and (B).
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信