Developing robust machine learning techniques to predict oil recovery: A comprehensive field and experimental study

0 ENERGY & FUELS
Wahib Yahya , Yang Baolin , Ayman Mutahar AlRassas , Wang Yuting , Harith Al-Khafaji , Riadh Al Dawood
{"title":"Developing robust machine learning techniques to predict oil recovery: A comprehensive field and experimental study","authors":"Wahib Yahya ,&nbsp;Yang Baolin ,&nbsp;Ayman Mutahar AlRassas ,&nbsp;Wang Yuting ,&nbsp;Harith Al-Khafaji ,&nbsp;Riadh Al Dawood","doi":"10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The volatility in the oil industry driven by significant market demand and notable resource reduction, underscores the crucial requirement for developing a reliable and robust framework to promote oil recovery strategy. This study integrated various robust Machine Learning (ML) algorithms including the Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) to predict oil recovery based on field and experimental data. Leveraging these models enhances prediction efficiency and reduces reliance on traditional methods. The performance of the integrated ML models with oilfield and experimental datasets, as well as the impact of multiple input parameters against traditional decline curve analysis (DCA) models, was evaluated. The findings reveal that RF, DT, and GBR models have achieved remarkable performance in contrast with other ML models and traditional DCA methods. The RF model has achieved the highest performance, reflected by a coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) value of 0.99 for both field Datasets (A) and experimental Datasets (B). More so, we accurately assess the ML model's robustness and performance by leveraging various metrics performance, including the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), to prove the robust alignment with a remarkable merit of accuracy and complexity across the integrated ML models. Ultimately, the results supported the RF model, which obtained the lowest AIC and BIC values among all the models for oil recovery prediction in Datasets (A) and (B).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100578,"journal":{"name":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","volume":"250 ","pages":"Article 213853"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891025002118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The volatility in the oil industry driven by significant market demand and notable resource reduction, underscores the crucial requirement for developing a reliable and robust framework to promote oil recovery strategy. This study integrated various robust Machine Learning (ML) algorithms including the Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) to predict oil recovery based on field and experimental data. Leveraging these models enhances prediction efficiency and reduces reliance on traditional methods. The performance of the integrated ML models with oilfield and experimental datasets, as well as the impact of multiple input parameters against traditional decline curve analysis (DCA) models, was evaluated. The findings reveal that RF, DT, and GBR models have achieved remarkable performance in contrast with other ML models and traditional DCA methods. The RF model has achieved the highest performance, reflected by a coefficient of determination (R2) value of 0.99 for both field Datasets (A) and experimental Datasets (B). More so, we accurately assess the ML model's robustness and performance by leveraging various metrics performance, including the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), to prove the robust alignment with a remarkable merit of accuracy and complexity across the integrated ML models. Ultimately, the results supported the RF model, which obtained the lowest AIC and BIC values among all the models for oil recovery prediction in Datasets (A) and (B).
开发强大的机器学习技术来预测石油采收率:一项综合的现场和实验研究
由于巨大的市场需求和显著的资源减少,石油行业的波动凸显了开发一个可靠和强大的框架来促进石油采收率战略的关键需求。该研究集成了各种鲁棒机器学习(ML)算法,包括决策树(DT)、随机森林(RF)、k近邻(KNN)、支持向量回归(SVR)、梯度增强回归(GBR)和多层感知器(MLP),以根据现场和实验数据预测石油采收率。利用这些模型可以提高预测效率,减少对传统方法的依赖。最后,对集成ML模型与油田和实验数据集的性能,以及多个输入参数对传统递减曲线分析(DCA)模型的影响进行了评估。研究结果表明,与其他ML模型和传统的DCA方法相比,RF、DT和GBR模型取得了显著的性能。RF模型取得了最高的性能,反映在现场数据集(a)和实验数据集(B)的决定系数(R2)值为0.99。此外,我们通过利用各种指标性能,包括贝叶斯信息标准(BIC)和赤池信息标准(AIC),准确评估机器学习模型的鲁棒性和性能,以证明在集成的机器学习模型中具有显著的准确性和复杂性优点的鲁棒性校准。最终,结果支持RF模型,该模型在数据集(A)和(B)中获得了最低的AIC和BIC值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信