Use of inhaled corticosteroids in bronchiectasis: data from the European Bronchiectasis Registry (EMBARC)

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Thorax Pub Date : 2025-03-23 DOI:10.1136/thorax-2024-221825
Jennifer Pollock, Eva Polverino, Raja Dhar, Katerina Dimakou, Letizia Traversi, Apostolos Bossios, Charles Haworth, Michael R Loebinger, Anthony De Soyza, Montserrat Vendrell, Pierre Regis Burgel, Pontus Mertsch, Melissa Jane McDonnell, Sabina Skgrat, Luis Maiz-Carro, Oriol Sibila, Menno van der Eerden, Paula Kauppi, Adam T Hill, Robert Wilson, Branislava Milenkovic, Rosario Menéndez, Marlene Murris, Megan L Crichton, Sermin Borecki, Dusanka Obradovic, Muhammed Irfan, Venera Eshenkulova, Adam Nowinski, Adelina Amorim, Antoni Torres, Natalie Lorent, Tobias Welte, Francesco Blasi, Eva Van Braeckel, Josje Altenburg, Michal Shteinberg, Wim Boersma, Joseph Stuart Elborn, Stefano Aliberti, Felix C Ringshausen, Pieter Goeminne, James D Chalmers
{"title":"Use of inhaled corticosteroids in bronchiectasis: data from the European Bronchiectasis Registry (EMBARC)","authors":"Jennifer Pollock, Eva Polverino, Raja Dhar, Katerina Dimakou, Letizia Traversi, Apostolos Bossios, Charles Haworth, Michael R Loebinger, Anthony De Soyza, Montserrat Vendrell, Pierre Regis Burgel, Pontus Mertsch, Melissa Jane McDonnell, Sabina Skgrat, Luis Maiz-Carro, Oriol Sibila, Menno van der Eerden, Paula Kauppi, Adam T Hill, Robert Wilson, Branislava Milenkovic, Rosario Menéndez, Marlene Murris, Megan L Crichton, Sermin Borecki, Dusanka Obradovic, Muhammed Irfan, Venera Eshenkulova, Adam Nowinski, Adelina Amorim, Antoni Torres, Natalie Lorent, Tobias Welte, Francesco Blasi, Eva Van Braeckel, Josje Altenburg, Michal Shteinberg, Wim Boersma, Joseph Stuart Elborn, Stefano Aliberti, Felix C Ringshausen, Pieter Goeminne, James D Chalmers","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2024-221825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Current bronchiectasis guidelines advise against the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) except in patients with associated asthma, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to describe the use of ICS in patients with bronchiectasis across Europe. Methods Patients with bronchiectasis were enrolled into the European Bronchiectasis Registry from 2015 to 2022. Patients were grouped into ICS users and non-users at baseline and clinical characteristics associated with ICS use were investigated. Patients were followed up for clinical outcomes of exacerbation, hospitalisation and mortality for up to 5 years. We evaluated if elevated blood eosinophil counts (above the laboratory upper limit of normal) modified the effect of ICS on exacerbations. Results 19 324 patients were included for analysis and 10 109 (52.3%) were recorded as being prescribed ICS at baseline. After exclusion of patients with a history of asthma, COPD and/or ABPA, 3174/9715 (32.7%) patients with bronchiectasis were prescribed ICS. Frequency of ICS use varied across countries, ranging from 17% to 85% of included patients. ICS users had more severe disease, with significantly worse lung function, higher Bronchiectasis Severity Index scores and more frequent exacerbations at baseline (p<0.0001). Overall, ICS users did not have a reduced risk of exacerbation or hospitalisation during follow-up, but a significant reduction in exacerbation frequency was observed in the subgroup of ICS users with elevated blood eosinophil counts (relative risk 0.70, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.84, p<0.001). Conclusion ICS use is common in bronchiectasis, including in those not currently recommended ICS according to bronchiectasis guidelines. ICS use may be associated with reduced exacerbation frequency in patients with elevated blood eosinophils. Data are available on reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.","PeriodicalId":23284,"journal":{"name":"Thorax","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-221825","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Current bronchiectasis guidelines advise against the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) except in patients with associated asthma, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to describe the use of ICS in patients with bronchiectasis across Europe. Methods Patients with bronchiectasis were enrolled into the European Bronchiectasis Registry from 2015 to 2022. Patients were grouped into ICS users and non-users at baseline and clinical characteristics associated with ICS use were investigated. Patients were followed up for clinical outcomes of exacerbation, hospitalisation and mortality for up to 5 years. We evaluated if elevated blood eosinophil counts (above the laboratory upper limit of normal) modified the effect of ICS on exacerbations. Results 19 324 patients were included for analysis and 10 109 (52.3%) were recorded as being prescribed ICS at baseline. After exclusion of patients with a history of asthma, COPD and/or ABPA, 3174/9715 (32.7%) patients with bronchiectasis were prescribed ICS. Frequency of ICS use varied across countries, ranging from 17% to 85% of included patients. ICS users had more severe disease, with significantly worse lung function, higher Bronchiectasis Severity Index scores and more frequent exacerbations at baseline (p<0.0001). Overall, ICS users did not have a reduced risk of exacerbation or hospitalisation during follow-up, but a significant reduction in exacerbation frequency was observed in the subgroup of ICS users with elevated blood eosinophil counts (relative risk 0.70, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.84, p<0.001). Conclusion ICS use is common in bronchiectasis, including in those not currently recommended ICS according to bronchiectasis guidelines. ICS use may be associated with reduced exacerbation frequency in patients with elevated blood eosinophils. Data are available on reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
导言:目前的支气管扩张指南建议除伴有哮喘、过敏性支气管肺曲霉菌病(ABPA)和/或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的患者外,禁止使用吸入性皮质类固醇激素(ICS)。本研究旨在描述欧洲支气管扩张症患者使用 ICS 的情况。方法 从 2015 年到 2022 年,支气管扩张症患者被纳入欧洲支气管扩张症登记处。患者在基线时被分为使用 ICS 和不使用 ICS 两类,并调查了与 ICS 使用相关的临床特征。我们对患者进行了长达 5 年的随访,以了解病情恶化、住院和死亡率等临床结果。我们评估了血液中嗜酸性粒细胞计数升高(超过实验室正常值上限)是否会改变 ICS 对病情加重的影响。结果 共纳入 19 324 名患者进行分析,其中 10 109 人(52.3%)在基线时被记录为服用了 ICS。在排除有哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺病和/或 ABPA 病史的患者后,有 3174/9715 例(32.7%)支气管扩张患者被处方 ICS。各国患者使用 ICS 的频率不尽相同,从 17% 到 85% 不等。使用 ICS 的患者病情更严重,肺功能明显更差,支气管扩张严重程度指数评分更高,基线时病情加重更频繁(P<0.0001)。总体而言,使用 ICS 的患者在随访期间病情加重或住院的风险并未降低,但在嗜酸性粒细胞计数升高的 ICS 使用者亚组中,病情加重的频率明显降低(相对风险为 0.70,95% CI 为 0.59 至 0.84,p<0.001)。结论 支气管扩张症患者普遍使用 ICS,包括目前未根据支气管扩张症指南推荐使用 ICS 的患者。使用 ICS 可能与血液中嗜酸性粒细胞升高的患者病情加重频率降低有关。如有合理要求,可提供相关数据。与研究相关的所有数据均包含在文章中或作为补充信息上传。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thorax
Thorax 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
197
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Thorax stands as one of the premier respiratory medicine journals globally, featuring clinical and experimental research articles spanning respiratory medicine, pediatrics, immunology, pharmacology, pathology, and surgery. The journal's mission is to publish noteworthy advancements in scientific understanding that are poised to influence clinical practice significantly. This encompasses articles delving into basic and translational mechanisms applicable to clinical material, covering areas such as cell and molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信