Temistocles Molinar, Daniel Sultanov, Hannah Klein, Andreas Hochwagen
{"title":"Fork-barrier-independent roles of topoisomerase I in the ribosomal DNA.","authors":"Temistocles Molinar, Daniel Sultanov, Hannah Klein, Andreas Hochwagen","doi":"10.1093/genetics/iyaf052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Topoisomerase I, a nickase that allows swiveling of the DNA substrate, is highly enriched in the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) from yeast to humans, but its function at this locus remains poorly understood. S. cerevisiae mutants lacking topoisomerase I (top1) exhibit pronounced rDNA instability and accumulate bubbles of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) on 35S ribosomal RNA genes, suggesting a role in relieving transcription-associated topological stress. However, Top1-cleavage complexes are most highly enriched in the rDNA-encoded replication-fork barrier, a genetically encoded source of rDNA instability, and only weakly in the 35S promoter, leading to the proposal that top1-associated rDNA instability may be linked to the fork barrier. Here, we show that the rDNA instability phenotypes of top1 mutants, including increased formation of extrachromosomal rDNA circles, elevated genetic marker loss, and instability of critically short rDNA arrays, are independent of the replication fork barrier. In addition, we link Top1 binding at the 35S promoter to the formation of a DNA species with a long ssDNA tail, which originates in the 35S promoter region and is undetectable in top1 mutants. This DNA species is abundant in wild-type cells, occurs independently of S phase, and may be the resolution product of the ssDNA bubbles seen in top1 mutants. Whether formation of this DNA species is important for rDNA stability remains unclear, but our findings link Top1 to highly active DNA metabolism in the 35S promoter.</p>","PeriodicalId":48925,"journal":{"name":"Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyaf052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Topoisomerase I, a nickase that allows swiveling of the DNA substrate, is highly enriched in the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) from yeast to humans, but its function at this locus remains poorly understood. S. cerevisiae mutants lacking topoisomerase I (top1) exhibit pronounced rDNA instability and accumulate bubbles of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) on 35S ribosomal RNA genes, suggesting a role in relieving transcription-associated topological stress. However, Top1-cleavage complexes are most highly enriched in the rDNA-encoded replication-fork barrier, a genetically encoded source of rDNA instability, and only weakly in the 35S promoter, leading to the proposal that top1-associated rDNA instability may be linked to the fork barrier. Here, we show that the rDNA instability phenotypes of top1 mutants, including increased formation of extrachromosomal rDNA circles, elevated genetic marker loss, and instability of critically short rDNA arrays, are independent of the replication fork barrier. In addition, we link Top1 binding at the 35S promoter to the formation of a DNA species with a long ssDNA tail, which originates in the 35S promoter region and is undetectable in top1 mutants. This DNA species is abundant in wild-type cells, occurs independently of S phase, and may be the resolution product of the ssDNA bubbles seen in top1 mutants. Whether formation of this DNA species is important for rDNA stability remains unclear, but our findings link Top1 to highly active DNA metabolism in the 35S promoter.
期刊介绍:
GENETICS is published by the Genetics Society of America, a scholarly society that seeks to deepen our understanding of the living world by advancing our understanding of genetics. Since 1916, GENETICS has published high-quality, original research presenting novel findings bearing on genetics and genomics. The journal publishes empirical studies of organisms ranging from microbes to humans, as well as theoretical work.
While it has an illustrious history, GENETICS has changed along with the communities it serves: it is not your mentor''s journal.
The editors make decisions quickly – in around 30 days – without sacrificing the excellence and scholarship for which the journal has long been known. GENETICS is a peer reviewed, peer-edited journal, with an international reach and increasing visibility and impact. All editorial decisions are made through collaboration of at least two editors who are practicing scientists.
GENETICS is constantly innovating: expanded types of content include Reviews, Commentary (current issues of interest to geneticists), Perspectives (historical), Primers (to introduce primary literature into the classroom), Toolbox Reviews, plus YeastBook, FlyBook, and WormBook (coming spring 2016). For particularly time-sensitive results, we publish Communications. As part of our mission to serve our communities, we''ve published thematic collections, including Genomic Selection, Multiparental Populations, Mouse Collaborative Cross, and the Genetics of Sex.