The Association of Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment With Outpatient Ambulatory Care Utilization in the Community.

Yi Chen, Bryan D James, Ana W Capuano, Mousumi Banerjee, Mellanie V Springer, Brittney S Lange-Maia, Lisa L Barnes, David A Bennett, Julie P W Bynum, Francine Grodstein
{"title":"The Association of Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment With Outpatient Ambulatory Care Utilization in the Community.","authors":"Yi Chen, Bryan D James, Ana W Capuano, Mousumi Banerjee, Mellanie V Springer, Brittney S Lange-Maia, Lisa L Barnes, David A Bennett, Julie P W Bynum, Francine Grodstein","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ambulatory care is critical in delivering interventions for dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), from basic services to novel therapeutics. Yet, little is known regarding how community-dwelling persons with dementia/MCI interact with clinicians in outpatient ambulatory settings. We assessed associations of dementia/MCI with outpatient ambulatory evaluation and management (E&M) visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 2116 community-dwelling participants in Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center cohorts, with linked fee-for-service Medicare claims. Annually from 2011 to 2019, cohort neuropsychologic evaluations classified participants as dementia, MCI, or no cognitive impairment (NCI). Across groups, we compared annual probability of visiting providers and number of E&M visits, using repeated measures logistic or generalized Poisson mixed effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 8672 person-years (PY) of follow-up, the mean age was 82 (SD 7.6) years; 77% of PYs were among females and 24% among Black participants. Controlling for demographics and comorbidity, the annual predicted probability of primary care visits was high in all groups (86%-92%). Although there were few visits with dementia-related specialists, we found a higher probability of these visits among those with dementia (15%) and MCI (17%) than NCI (12%; p = 0.009, dementia vs. NCI; p < 0.001, MCI vs. NCI). There were striking differences in visits to other medical specialties: the mean number of annual visits was 40% lower for those with dementia (p < 0.001) and 10% lower for MCI (p < 0.001) than NCI. Overall, dementia and MCI were associated with 19% (p < 0.001) and 4% (p = 0.005) fewer E&M visits, respectively, compared to NCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Older adults with dementia and MCI interact with primary care providers regularly and are more likely to use dementia-related specialists than those with NCI. Yet, we found lower utilization of other medical specialties, without compensatory increases in primary care, leading to fewer overall E&M visits, even in MCI. Together, the findings may suggest lost opportunities to address the scope of health issues in vulnerable groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ambulatory care is critical in delivering interventions for dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), from basic services to novel therapeutics. Yet, little is known regarding how community-dwelling persons with dementia/MCI interact with clinicians in outpatient ambulatory settings. We assessed associations of dementia/MCI with outpatient ambulatory evaluation and management (E&M) visits.

Methods: We included 2116 community-dwelling participants in Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center cohorts, with linked fee-for-service Medicare claims. Annually from 2011 to 2019, cohort neuropsychologic evaluations classified participants as dementia, MCI, or no cognitive impairment (NCI). Across groups, we compared annual probability of visiting providers and number of E&M visits, using repeated measures logistic or generalized Poisson mixed effects models.

Results: Across 8672 person-years (PY) of follow-up, the mean age was 82 (SD 7.6) years; 77% of PYs were among females and 24% among Black participants. Controlling for demographics and comorbidity, the annual predicted probability of primary care visits was high in all groups (86%-92%). Although there were few visits with dementia-related specialists, we found a higher probability of these visits among those with dementia (15%) and MCI (17%) than NCI (12%; p = 0.009, dementia vs. NCI; p < 0.001, MCI vs. NCI). There were striking differences in visits to other medical specialties: the mean number of annual visits was 40% lower for those with dementia (p < 0.001) and 10% lower for MCI (p < 0.001) than NCI. Overall, dementia and MCI were associated with 19% (p < 0.001) and 4% (p = 0.005) fewer E&M visits, respectively, compared to NCI.

Conclusions: Older adults with dementia and MCI interact with primary care providers regularly and are more likely to use dementia-related specialists than those with NCI. Yet, we found lower utilization of other medical specialties, without compensatory increases in primary care, leading to fewer overall E&M visits, even in MCI. Together, the findings may suggest lost opportunities to address the scope of health issues in vulnerable groups.

痴呆和轻度认知障碍与社区门诊护理利用的关系。
背景:从基本服务到新疗法,门诊护理在提供痴呆症和轻度认知障碍(MCI)干预措施方面至关重要。然而,关于社区居住的痴呆症/轻度认知障碍患者如何在门诊门诊环境中与临床医生互动,我们知之甚少。我们评估了痴呆/MCI与门诊门诊评估和管理(E&M)访问的关系。方法:我们纳入了2116名拉什阿尔茨海默病中心队列的社区居民参与者,他们都有相关的按服务收费的医疗保险索赔。从2011年到2019年,每年都会进行队列神经心理学评估,将参与者分为痴呆、轻度认知障碍(MCI)或无认知障碍(NCI)。在各组中,我们使用重复测量逻辑模型或广义泊松混合效应模型,比较了每年访问提供者的概率和访问E&M的次数。结果:随访8672人年(PY),平均年龄82岁(SD 7.6);77%的PYs为女性,24%为黑人参与者。控制人口统计学和合并症,所有组的年度预测初级保健就诊概率都很高(86%-92%)。虽然与痴呆症相关的专家很少就诊,但我们发现痴呆症患者(15%)和轻度认知障碍患者(17%)的就诊概率高于非认知障碍患者(12%);p = 0.009,痴呆vs. NCI;p结论:老年痴呆和轻度认知障碍患者经常与初级保健提供者互动,并且比NCI患者更有可能使用痴呆相关专家。然而,我们发现其他医学专业的使用率较低,初级保健没有补偿性增加,导致E&M总访问量减少,即使在MCI中也是如此。总之,这些发现可能表明,我们失去了解决弱势群体健康问题的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信