Childhood Risk Factors for Violent Ideations in Late Adolescence and Early Adulthood

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Manuel Eisner, Denis Ribeaud, Laura Bechtiger, Aja Murray, Andrea Tam
{"title":"Childhood Risk Factors for Violent Ideations in Late Adolescence and Early Adulthood","authors":"Manuel Eisner,&nbsp;Denis Ribeaud,&nbsp;Laura Bechtiger,&nbsp;Aja Murray,&nbsp;Andrea Tam","doi":"10.1002/cbm.2382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Violent ideations (VIs) refer to thoughts, daydreams or fantasies of killing, inflicting serious physical harm or humiliating another person. Violent ideations are of particular interest at the intersection between mental health and violent behaviour. However, little is currently known about developmental trajectories of violent ideations in adolescence and early adulthood, and the extent to which childhood risk factors predict the likelihood of violent ideations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to address three key questions: (1) what are the developmental trends in violent thinking from ages 13 to 24, and how do they differ by sex? (2) To what extent can childhood risk factors predict VIs in late adolescence and early adulthood? (3) Are these associations sex-specific?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data were collected from the z-proso cohort study that is an on-going population-based longitudinal cohort study of 1555 participants. We use participant, teacher and parent reports to examine the extent to which childhood trait aggressiveness, poor impulse control, social rejection, an adverse family environment and violent media consumption predict the likelihood of violent ideations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Descriptive analyses show that VIs strongly decline from late adolescence to early adulthood. We also find substantial between-individual stability in VIs between ages 17, 20 and 24. Indicators of childhood aggressiveness, poor impulse control, social rejection, an adverse family environment and adult media consumption were found to consistently predict increased violent ideations among males. Among females, self-reported aggressive behaviour, aversive parenting and a poor teacher–child bond had relatively strong associations with VIs. Overall, childhood risk factors were more predictive of VIs among male study participants than among females.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The propensity to experience VIs declines between ages 15 and 24. The experience of VIs during late adolescence to early adulthood had long-term associations with childhood risk factors indicative of general aggressiveness, low impulse control, social rejection, an adverse family context and violent media consumption. Most prospective associations were stronger for males than for females. This is consistent with the notion that a relatively stable violent potential is shaped in childhood for a larger proportion of males than females.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47362,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health","volume":"35 2","pages":"95-105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cbm.2382","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbm.2382","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Violent ideations (VIs) refer to thoughts, daydreams or fantasies of killing, inflicting serious physical harm or humiliating another person. Violent ideations are of particular interest at the intersection between mental health and violent behaviour. However, little is currently known about developmental trajectories of violent ideations in adolescence and early adulthood, and the extent to which childhood risk factors predict the likelihood of violent ideations.

Aims

This study aims to address three key questions: (1) what are the developmental trends in violent thinking from ages 13 to 24, and how do they differ by sex? (2) To what extent can childhood risk factors predict VIs in late adolescence and early adulthood? (3) Are these associations sex-specific?

Methods

Data were collected from the z-proso cohort study that is an on-going population-based longitudinal cohort study of 1555 participants. We use participant, teacher and parent reports to examine the extent to which childhood trait aggressiveness, poor impulse control, social rejection, an adverse family environment and violent media consumption predict the likelihood of violent ideations.

Results

Descriptive analyses show that VIs strongly decline from late adolescence to early adulthood. We also find substantial between-individual stability in VIs between ages 17, 20 and 24. Indicators of childhood aggressiveness, poor impulse control, social rejection, an adverse family environment and adult media consumption were found to consistently predict increased violent ideations among males. Among females, self-reported aggressive behaviour, aversive parenting and a poor teacher–child bond had relatively strong associations with VIs. Overall, childhood risk factors were more predictive of VIs among male study participants than among females.

Conclusions

The propensity to experience VIs declines between ages 15 and 24. The experience of VIs during late adolescence to early adulthood had long-term associations with childhood risk factors indicative of general aggressiveness, low impulse control, social rejection, an adverse family context and violent media consumption. Most prospective associations were stronger for males than for females. This is consistent with the notion that a relatively stable violent potential is shaped in childhood for a larger proportion of males than females.

Abstract Image

青少年晚期和成年早期暴力意念的儿童危险因素。
背景:暴力意念(VIs)是指杀人、造成严重身体伤害或侮辱他人的想法、白日梦或幻想。在心理健康和暴力行为之间的交叉点,暴力观念特别令人感兴趣。然而,目前对青少年和成年早期暴力观念的发展轨迹以及童年危险因素在多大程度上预测暴力观念的可能性知之甚少。目的:本研究旨在解决三个关键问题:(1)13 - 24岁暴力思维的发展趋势是什么,性别之间有何差异?(2)儿童期危险因素对青春期晚期和成年早期VIs的预测作用有多大?(3)这些关联是否有性别特异性?方法:数据收集自z-proso队列研究,这是一项正在进行的基于人群的纵向队列研究,共有1555名参与者。我们使用参与者、教师和家长的报告来检验童年特征攻击性、冲动控制能力差、社会排斥、不良的家庭环境和暴力媒体消费在多大程度上预测暴力观念的可能性。结果:描述性分析表明,从青春期晚期到成年早期,VIs急剧下降。我们还发现,在17岁、20岁和24岁之间,VIs的个体间稳定性很强。研究发现,童年时期的攻击性、较差的冲动控制、社会排斥、不良的家庭环境和成人媒体消费等指标与男性暴力观念的增加一致。在女性中,自我报告的攻击性行为、厌恶的养育方式和糟糕的师生关系与VIs有相对较强的关联。总体而言,童年时期的风险因素在男性研究参与者中比在女性中更能预测VIs。结论:在15岁到24岁之间,经历VIs的倾向下降。青少年晚期到成年早期的视觉障碍经历与儿童时期的危险因素有长期的联系,这些因素表明一般的攻击性、低冲动控制、社会排斥、不良的家庭环境和暴力媒体消费。大多数预期的关联在男性中比在女性中更强。这与男性在童年时期形成相对稳定的暴力倾向的比例高于女性的观点是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Criminal Behaviour & Mental Health – CBMH – aims to publish original material on any aspect of the relationship between mental state and criminal behaviour. Thus, we are interested in mental mechanisms associated with offending, regardless of whether the individual concerned has a mental disorder or not. We are interested in factors that influence such relationships, and particularly welcome studies about pathways into and out of crime. These will include studies of normal and abnormal development, of mental disorder and how that may lead to offending for a subgroup of sufferers, together with information about factors which mediate such a relationship.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信