Bargaining With 'Reproductive Capital': Multilayered Stratified Reproduction in the Case of Taiwanese Gay Men Seeking Transnational Surrogacy.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jung Chen
{"title":"Bargaining With 'Reproductive Capital': Multilayered Stratified Reproduction in the Case of Taiwanese Gay Men Seeking Transnational Surrogacy.","authors":"Jung Chen","doi":"10.1111/1467-9566.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scholars in the field of social studies of reproduction have recently turned their attention to the booming cross-border reproductive industry. In the case of gay men seeking donor ova and surrogacy to become fathers, there are issues of uneven accessibility and disparity between privileged intended gay fathers and comparatively less affluent women who offer reproductive labour. Despite being the first country in Asia to legalise same-sex marriage, Taiwan still holds back on LGBTQ+ reproductive rights. This compels intended queer parents to travel abroad for assisted reproduction. This article draws on 53 in-depth interviews with Taiwanese gay men seeking transnational surrogacy. Adopting a Bourdieusian perspective, I examine how they 'bargained with' economic, social, cultural and symbolic capital to achieve reproductive goals at the intersections of sexuality, nationality, race and sociolegal constraints. When it comes to multilayered stratified reproduction, my findings highlight disparities between (1) heterosexuals and LGBTQ+ people, (2) intended gay fathers and (3) gay fathers and surrogates. This article enriches our understanding of stratified reproduction, transnational surrogacy and queer reproductive justice by introducing the concept of 'reproductive capital' that was strategically accumulated and mobilised by gay fathers in order to navigate the complex multilayered reproductive stratifications in transnational reproduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":21685,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of health & illness","volume":"47 3","pages":"e70019"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of health & illness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.70019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholars in the field of social studies of reproduction have recently turned their attention to the booming cross-border reproductive industry. In the case of gay men seeking donor ova and surrogacy to become fathers, there are issues of uneven accessibility and disparity between privileged intended gay fathers and comparatively less affluent women who offer reproductive labour. Despite being the first country in Asia to legalise same-sex marriage, Taiwan still holds back on LGBTQ+ reproductive rights. This compels intended queer parents to travel abroad for assisted reproduction. This article draws on 53 in-depth interviews with Taiwanese gay men seeking transnational surrogacy. Adopting a Bourdieusian perspective, I examine how they 'bargained with' economic, social, cultural and symbolic capital to achieve reproductive goals at the intersections of sexuality, nationality, race and sociolegal constraints. When it comes to multilayered stratified reproduction, my findings highlight disparities between (1) heterosexuals and LGBTQ+ people, (2) intended gay fathers and (3) gay fathers and surrogates. This article enriches our understanding of stratified reproduction, transnational surrogacy and queer reproductive justice by introducing the concept of 'reproductive capital' that was strategically accumulated and mobilised by gay fathers in order to navigate the complex multilayered reproductive stratifications in transnational reproduction.

与“生殖资本”讨价还价:台湾男同性恋寻求跨国代孕个案中的多层次分层生殖。
近年来,生殖社会研究领域的学者们将注意力转向了蓬勃发展的跨境生殖产业。在男同性恋者寻求捐赠卵子和代孕成为父亲的情况下,有特权的准男同性恋父亲和相对不那么富裕的提供生育劳动的女性之间存在着不平等的可及性和差异。尽管台湾是亚洲第一个将同性婚姻合法化的国家,但在LGBTQ+的生殖权利方面,台湾仍然有所保留。这迫使有意向的酷儿父母前往国外寻求辅助生殖。本文对53位寻求跨国代孕的台湾男同志进行深度访谈。采用布尔迪乌主义的观点,我研究了他们如何与经济、社会、文化和象征资本“讨价还价”,以在性、国籍、种族和社会法律约束的交叉点上实现生殖目标。当涉及到多层分层生殖时,我的发现突出了(1)异性恋者和LGBTQ+人群之间的差异,(2)准同性恋父亲和(3)同性恋父亲和代孕母亲之间的差异。这篇文章通过引入“生殖资本”的概念,丰富了我们对分层生殖、跨国代孕和酷儿生殖正义的理解。“生殖资本”是由同性恋父亲战略性地积累和动员的,目的是在跨国生殖中导航复杂的多层生殖分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Sociology of Health & Illness is an international journal which publishes sociological articles on all aspects of health, illness, medicine and health care. We welcome empirical and theoretical contributions in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信