Existing Knowledge Gaps in Risk Factors and Consequences of Lipohypertrophy in People Using Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 4.1 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Julia K Mader, Riccardo Fornengo, Ahmed Hassoun, Lutz Heinemann, Bernhard Kulzer, Magdalena Monica, Trung Nguyen, Jochen Sieber, Eric Renard, Yves Reznik, Przemysław Ryś, Anita Stożek-Tutro, Emma G Wilmot
{"title":"Existing Knowledge Gaps in Risk Factors and Consequences of Lipohypertrophy in People Using Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Julia K Mader, Riccardo Fornengo, Ahmed Hassoun, Lutz Heinemann, Bernhard Kulzer, Magdalena Monica, Trung Nguyen, Jochen Sieber, Eric Renard, Yves Reznik, Przemysław Ryś, Anita Stożek-Tutro, Emma G Wilmot","doi":"10.1177/19322968251319806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lipohypertrophy is a common skin complication in individuals with insulin-treated diabetes, but this condition in those using insulin pumps (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, CSII) remains poorly understood. This study aimed to identify and summarize scientific evidence regarding the risk factors and clinical consequences of lipohypertrophy in people using CSII.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL) were searched to identify relevant studies published in English from 1990 to March 19, 2024. If possible, extracted data were cumulated in meta-analyses. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024554127).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies reporting risk factors for lipohypertrophy or its consequences in people treated with CSII were identified. In the included studies, only individual risk factors were reported, which in most cases prevented the conduct of a meta-analysis. Meta-analyses could be performed for two factors, that is, improper cannula site rotation and male sex. The odds of developing lipohypertrophy were higher in individuals incorrectly rotating (prevalence odds ratio, pOR = 2.59 [1.39; 4.83]), whereas gender had no impact on the prevalence of lipohypertrophy (pOR = 1.13 [0.62; 2.06]). Due to the limitations of the available data, it was not possible to draw conclusions about the clinical consequences of lipohypertrophy in people on CSII.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review demonstrated that studies on the risk factors and clinical consequences of lipohypertrophy in CSII users are limited and that the currently published data are insufficient to draw definitive conclusions. There is a need for more comprehensive and well-designed clinical studies to better understand this issue in CSII users.</p>","PeriodicalId":15475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"19322968251319806"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11949757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968251319806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lipohypertrophy is a common skin complication in individuals with insulin-treated diabetes, but this condition in those using insulin pumps (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, CSII) remains poorly understood. This study aimed to identify and summarize scientific evidence regarding the risk factors and clinical consequences of lipohypertrophy in people using CSII.

Methods: Medical databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL) were searched to identify relevant studies published in English from 1990 to March 19, 2024. If possible, extracted data were cumulated in meta-analyses. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024554127).

Results: Nine studies reporting risk factors for lipohypertrophy or its consequences in people treated with CSII were identified. In the included studies, only individual risk factors were reported, which in most cases prevented the conduct of a meta-analysis. Meta-analyses could be performed for two factors, that is, improper cannula site rotation and male sex. The odds of developing lipohypertrophy were higher in individuals incorrectly rotating (prevalence odds ratio, pOR = 2.59 [1.39; 4.83]), whereas gender had no impact on the prevalence of lipohypertrophy (pOR = 1.13 [0.62; 2.06]). Due to the limitations of the available data, it was not possible to draw conclusions about the clinical consequences of lipohypertrophy in people on CSII.

Conclusions: This systematic review demonstrated that studies on the risk factors and clinical consequences of lipohypertrophy in CSII users are limited and that the currently published data are insufficient to draw definitive conclusions. There is a need for more comprehensive and well-designed clinical studies to better understand this issue in CSII users.

持续皮下胰岛素输注疗法患者脂肪肥厚的风险因素和后果方面的现有知识差距:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景:脂肪肥大是胰岛素治疗糖尿病患者常见的皮肤并发症,但对于使用胰岛素泵(持续皮下胰岛素输注,CSII)的患者的这种情况仍知之甚少。本研究旨在识别和总结有关使用CSII的患者脂肪肥大的危险因素和临床后果的科学证据。方法:检索医学数据库(MEDLINE/PubMed、Embase、CENTRAL),检索1990年至2024年3月19日发表的相关英文研究。如果可能,提取的数据在荟萃分析中累积。本系统评价已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024554127)。结果:九项研究报告了CSII患者脂肪肥大的危险因素及其后果。在纳入的研究中,仅报告了个体风险因素,这在大多数情况下阻碍了荟萃分析的进行。对插管位置旋转不当和男性性别两个因素进行meta分析。不正确旋转的个体发生脂肪肥大的几率更高(患病率优势比,pOR = 2.59 [1.39;4.83]),而性别对脂肪肥大的患病率没有影响(pOR = 1.13 [0.62;2.06])。由于现有数据的限制,无法得出关于CSII患者脂肪肥大的临床后果的结论。结论:本系统综述表明,关于CSII使用者脂肪肥大的危险因素和临床后果的研究是有限的,目前发表的数据不足以得出明确的结论。有必要进行更全面和精心设计的临床研究,以更好地了解CSII使用者的这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (JDST) is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Diabetes Technology Society. JDST covers scientific and clinical aspects of diabetes technology including glucose monitoring, insulin and metabolic peptide delivery, the artificial pancreas, digital health, precision medicine, social media, cybersecurity, software for modeling, physiologic monitoring, technology for managing obesity, and diagnostic tests of glycation. The journal also covers the development and use of mobile applications and wireless communication, as well as bioengineered tools such as MEMS, new biomaterials, and nanotechnology to develop new sensors. Articles in JDST cover both basic research and clinical applications of technologies being developed to help people with diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信