Impact of PD1 blockade added to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on rectal cancer surgery: post-hoc analysis of the randomized POLARSTAR trial.

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Kai Pang, Xinzhi Liu, Hongwei Yao, Guole Lin, Yuanyuan Kong, Ang Li, Jiagang Han, Guoju Wu, Xin Wang, Yingjiang Ye, Jie Zhang, Guangyong Chen, Aiwen Wu, Yi Xiao, Yingchi Yang, Zhongtao Zhang
{"title":"Impact of PD1 blockade added to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on rectal cancer surgery: post-hoc analysis of the randomized POLARSTAR trial.","authors":"Kai Pang, Xinzhi Liu, Hongwei Yao, Guole Lin, Yuanyuan Kong, Ang Li, Jiagang Han, Guoju Wu, Xin Wang, Yingjiang Ye, Jie Zhang, Guangyong Chen, Aiwen Wu, Yi Xiao, Yingchi Yang, Zhongtao Zhang","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The addition of PD1 blockade to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been shown to significantly increase pCR rates in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Yet, its impact on total mesorectal excision (TME) remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A post-hoc analysis of the randomized POLARSTAR trial, which enrolled patients with LARC at eight major colorectal cancer centres in Beijing to compare neoadjuvant CRT plus PD1 blockade with CRT alone, was undertaken. Patients received one of three combinations of neoadjuvant treatments before TME surgery: CRT plus concurrent PD1 blockade (concurrent group), CRT plus sequential PD1 blockade (sequential group), and CRT alone (control group). Several parameters related to TME surgery were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the concurrent group, the sequential group, and the control group, 52, 46, and 45 patients respectively were included in this analysis. The proportion of patients undergoing sphincter-saving plus one-stage anastomosis surgery was 92% (48 of 52), 96% (44 of 46), and 87% (39 of 45) respectively. The proportion of patients without a stoma was 21% (11 of 52), 17% (8 of 46), and 11% (5 of 45) respectively. The grade 3/4 surgical complication rate was 4% (2 of 52), 7% (3 of 46), and 4% (2 of 45) respectively. Significant differences were observed between the sequential group and the control group with respect to the proportion of patients with TRG0 (37% versus 18% respectively; P = 0.040), ypT0/is ypN0 (39% versus 20% respectively; P = 0.046), and a low neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score (54% versus 31% respectively; P = 0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neoadjuvant CRT plus PD1 blockade enhances pathological tumour regression and is beneficial to the successful implementation of TME in patients with LARC. Validations with larger sample sizes are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"112 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf057","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The addition of PD1 blockade to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been shown to significantly increase pCR rates in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Yet, its impact on total mesorectal excision (TME) remains unknown.

Methods: A post-hoc analysis of the randomized POLARSTAR trial, which enrolled patients with LARC at eight major colorectal cancer centres in Beijing to compare neoadjuvant CRT plus PD1 blockade with CRT alone, was undertaken. Patients received one of three combinations of neoadjuvant treatments before TME surgery: CRT plus concurrent PD1 blockade (concurrent group), CRT plus sequential PD1 blockade (sequential group), and CRT alone (control group). Several parameters related to TME surgery were studied.

Results: For the concurrent group, the sequential group, and the control group, 52, 46, and 45 patients respectively were included in this analysis. The proportion of patients undergoing sphincter-saving plus one-stage anastomosis surgery was 92% (48 of 52), 96% (44 of 46), and 87% (39 of 45) respectively. The proportion of patients without a stoma was 21% (11 of 52), 17% (8 of 46), and 11% (5 of 45) respectively. The grade 3/4 surgical complication rate was 4% (2 of 52), 7% (3 of 46), and 4% (2 of 45) respectively. Significant differences were observed between the sequential group and the control group with respect to the proportion of patients with TRG0 (37% versus 18% respectively; P = 0.040), ypT0/is ypN0 (39% versus 20% respectively; P = 0.046), and a low neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score (54% versus 31% respectively; P = 0.025).

Conclusions: Neoadjuvant CRT plus PD1 blockade enhances pathological tumour regression and is beneficial to the successful implementation of TME in patients with LARC. Validations with larger sample sizes are warranted.

PD1阻断剂加入新辅助放化疗对直肠癌手术的影响:polstar随机试验的事后分析
背景:在新辅助放化疗(CRT)中添加PD1阻断剂已被证明可显著增加局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)的pCR率。然而,其对全肠系膜切除术(TME)的影响尚不清楚。方法:对北京8个主要结直肠癌中心的LARC患者进行的polstar随机试验进行了回顾性分析,以比较新辅助CRT + PD1阻断与单独CRT。患者在TME手术前接受三种新辅助治疗组合中的一种:CRT +并发PD1阻断(并发组),CRT +顺序PD1阻断(顺序组)和CRT单独(对照组)。研究了与TME手术相关的几个参数。结果:并发组、顺序组和对照组分别纳入52例、46例和45例患者。保括约肌加一期吻合术的比例分别为92%(52例中48例)、96%(46例中44例)和87%(45例中39例)。无造口的患者比例分别为21%(52例中11例)、17%(46例中8例)和11%(45例中5例)。3/4级手术并发症发生率分别为4%(52例中2例)、7%(46例中3例)和4%(45例中2例)。序贯组和对照组在TRG0患者比例方面存在显著差异(分别为37%和18%;P = 0.040), ypT0/is ypN0(分别为39% vs 20%;P = 0.046)和低新辅助直肠(NAR)评分(分别为54%和31%;P = 0.025)。结论:新辅助CRT + PD1阻断可促进病理性肿瘤消退,有利于LARC患者TME的成功实施。更大样本量的验证是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1102
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Surgery (BJS), incorporating the European Journal of Surgery, stands as Europe's leading peer-reviewed surgical journal. It serves as an invaluable platform for presenting high-quality clinical and laboratory-based research across a wide range of surgical topics. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of traditional surgical practices, BJS also showcases emerging areas in the field, such as minimally invasive therapy and interventional radiology. While the journal appeals to general surgeons, it also holds relevance for specialty surgeons and professionals working in closely related fields. By presenting cutting-edge research and advancements, BJS aims to revolutionize the way surgical knowledge is shared and contribute to the ongoing progress of the surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信