Clevidipine and a cost-saving initiative for titratable intravenous antihypertensive agents.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Haley Pajunen, Joy Bittner, Roberta Aulie, Reid Larson
{"title":"Clevidipine and a cost-saving initiative for titratable intravenous antihypertensive agents.","authors":"Haley Pajunen, Joy Bittner, Roberta Aulie, Reid Larson","doi":"10.1093/ajhp/zxaf074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This quality improvement initiative assessed the utilization of clevidipine (Cleviprex) in an institutional setting. The purpose was to identify cost-saving opportunities and implement strategies to promote cost-effective and clinically appropriate use of antihypertensive agents in various clinical scenarios.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This research was a single-center retrospective chart review of patients who received clevidipine from January 1 to August 31, 2023. Patients who were 18 years of age or older and had at least one documented clevidipine administration were included. In the patient population, 70% received clevidipine for a surgical hypertension indication and 30% received it for a medical hypertension indication. Only 18% of patients on clevidipine received concurrent antihypertensive agents, indicating that 82% of patients received clevidipine as first-line treatment. The results also showed significant medication waste when stocking 100-mL vials of clevidipine: less than 5 mL total was administered for 76.9% of the vials used in the operating room. In a cost comparison of the institution's titratable intravenous antihypertensives on formulary, the clevidipine 100-mL vial was the most expensive agent. A 2-phase approach to reduce medication waste and overall medication use was implemented. During phase 1, the clevidipine inventory was converted from 100-mL to 50-mL vials to reduce the amount of wasted medication. Order set revisions were carried out in phase 2 to create a guideline-directed, tiered approach to optimize antihypertensive medication therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A review of clevidipine utilization at the institution identified multiple strategies to reduce use, medication waste, and overall medication cost through appropriate use of intravenous antihypertensive agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":7577,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"S2955-S2962"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxaf074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This quality improvement initiative assessed the utilization of clevidipine (Cleviprex) in an institutional setting. The purpose was to identify cost-saving opportunities and implement strategies to promote cost-effective and clinically appropriate use of antihypertensive agents in various clinical scenarios.

Summary: This research was a single-center retrospective chart review of patients who received clevidipine from January 1 to August 31, 2023. Patients who were 18 years of age or older and had at least one documented clevidipine administration were included. In the patient population, 70% received clevidipine for a surgical hypertension indication and 30% received it for a medical hypertension indication. Only 18% of patients on clevidipine received concurrent antihypertensive agents, indicating that 82% of patients received clevidipine as first-line treatment. The results also showed significant medication waste when stocking 100-mL vials of clevidipine: less than 5 mL total was administered for 76.9% of the vials used in the operating room. In a cost comparison of the institution's titratable intravenous antihypertensives on formulary, the clevidipine 100-mL vial was the most expensive agent. A 2-phase approach to reduce medication waste and overall medication use was implemented. During phase 1, the clevidipine inventory was converted from 100-mL to 50-mL vials to reduce the amount of wasted medication. Order set revisions were carried out in phase 2 to create a guideline-directed, tiered approach to optimize antihypertensive medication therapy.

Conclusion: A review of clevidipine utilization at the institution identified multiple strategies to reduce use, medication waste, and overall medication cost through appropriate use of intravenous antihypertensive agents.

克利维地平和可滴注静脉降压药的成本节约倡议。
免责声明:为了加快文章的发表,AJHP在接受稿件后将尽快在网上发布。被接受的稿件已经过同行评审和编辑,但在技术格式化和作者校对之前会在网上发布。这些手稿不是记录的最终版本,稍后将被最终文章(按照AJHP风格格式化并由作者校对)所取代。目的:本质量改进倡议评估了克利夫地平(Cleviprex)在机构环境中的使用情况。目的是确定节省成本的机会和实施策略,以促进在各种临床情况下具有成本效益和临床适当使用抗高血压药物。摘要:本研究是对2023年1月1日至8月31日接受克利夫地平治疗的患者进行的单中心回顾性研究。患者年龄≥18岁,且至少有一次克利夫地平用药记录。在患者群体中,70%的人接受了克利夫地平的手术高血压指征,30%的人接受了克利夫地平的内科高血压指征。只有18%的服用克利夫地平的患者同时服用抗高血压药物,这表明82%的患者接受了克利夫地平作为一线治疗。结果还显示,在储备100 mL的小瓶克利夫地平时,存在明显的药物浪费:76.9%的小瓶在手术室中使用,总用量少于5 mL。在该机构处方上可滴定静脉注射抗高血压药物的成本比较中,100毫升小瓶的克利夫地平是最昂贵的药物。实施了两阶段方法来减少药物浪费和总体药物使用。在第一阶段,克利夫地平库存从100毫升转换为50毫升,以减少浪费的药物量。在第二阶段进行了命令集修订,以创建一个有指导意义的分层方法来优化降压药物治疗。结论:通过对该机构克利夫地平使用情况的回顾,确定了通过适当使用静脉降压药来减少使用、药物浪费和总药物成本的多种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
18.50%
发文量
341
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (AJHP) is the official publication of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). It publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers on contemporary drug therapy and pharmacy practice innovations in hospitals and health systems. With a circulation of more than 43,000, AJHP is the most widely recognized and respected clinical pharmacy journal in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信