Ladle: a method for unsupervised anomaly detection across log types

IF 2 2区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Juha Mylläri, Tatu Aalto, Jukka K. Nurminen
{"title":"Ladle: a method for unsupervised anomaly detection across log types","authors":"Juha Mylläri,&nbsp;Tatu Aalto,&nbsp;Jukka K. Nurminen","doi":"10.1007/s10515-025-00504-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Log files can help detect and diagnose erroneous software behaviour, but their utility is limited by the ability of users and developers to sift through large amounts of text. Unsupervised machine learning tools have been developed to automatically find anomalies in logs, but they are usually not designed for situations where a large number of log streams or log files, each with its own characteristics, need to be analyzed and their anomaly scores compared. We propose Ladle, an accurate unsupervised anomaly detection and localization method that can simultaneously learn the characteristics of hundreds of log types and determine which log entries are the most anomalous across these log types. Ladle uses a sentence transformer (a large language model) to embed short overlapping segments of log files and compares new, potentially anomalous, log segments against a collection of reference data. The result of the comparison is re-centered by subtracting a baseline score indicating how much variation tends to occur in each log type, making anomaly scores comparable across log types. Ladle is designed to adapt to data drift and is updated by adding new reference data without the need to retrain the sentence transformer. We demonstrate the accuracy of Ladle on a real-world dataset consisting of logs produced by an endpoint protection platform test suite. We also compare Ladle’s performance on the dataset to that of a state-of-the-art method for single-log anomaly detection, showing that the latter is inadequate for the multi-log task.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55414,"journal":{"name":"Automated Software Engineering","volume":"32 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10515-025-00504-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automated Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10515-025-00504-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Log files can help detect and diagnose erroneous software behaviour, but their utility is limited by the ability of users and developers to sift through large amounts of text. Unsupervised machine learning tools have been developed to automatically find anomalies in logs, but they are usually not designed for situations where a large number of log streams or log files, each with its own characteristics, need to be analyzed and their anomaly scores compared. We propose Ladle, an accurate unsupervised anomaly detection and localization method that can simultaneously learn the characteristics of hundreds of log types and determine which log entries are the most anomalous across these log types. Ladle uses a sentence transformer (a large language model) to embed short overlapping segments of log files and compares new, potentially anomalous, log segments against a collection of reference data. The result of the comparison is re-centered by subtracting a baseline score indicating how much variation tends to occur in each log type, making anomaly scores comparable across log types. Ladle is designed to adapt to data drift and is updated by adding new reference data without the need to retrain the sentence transformer. We demonstrate the accuracy of Ladle on a real-world dataset consisting of logs produced by an endpoint protection platform test suite. We also compare Ladle’s performance on the dataset to that of a state-of-the-art method for single-log anomaly detection, showing that the latter is inadequate for the multi-log task.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Automated Software Engineering
Automated Software Engineering 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal details research, tutorial papers, survey and accounts of significant industrial experience in the foundations, techniques, tools and applications of automated software engineering technology. This includes the study of techniques for constructing, understanding, adapting, and modeling software artifacts and processes. Coverage in Automated Software Engineering examines both automatic systems and collaborative systems as well as computational models of human software engineering activities. In addition, it presents knowledge representations and artificial intelligence techniques applicable to automated software engineering, and formal techniques that support or provide theoretical foundations. The journal also includes reviews of books, software, conferences and workshops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信