Empirical Approach to Sample Size Estimation for Testing of AI Algorithms

IF 0.5 4区 数学 Q3 MATHEMATICS
M. R. Kodenko, T. M. Bobrovskaya, R. V. Reshetnikov, K. M. Arzamasov, A. V. Vladzymyrskyy, O. V. Omelyanskaya, Yu. A. Vasilev
{"title":"Empirical Approach to Sample Size Estimation for Testing of AI Algorithms","authors":"M. R. Kodenko,&nbsp;T. M. Bobrovskaya,&nbsp;R. V. Reshetnikov,&nbsp;K. M. Arzamasov,&nbsp;A. V. Vladzymyrskyy,&nbsp;O. V. Omelyanskaya,&nbsp;Yu. A. Vasilev","doi":"10.1134/S1064562424602063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Calculation of sample size is one of the basic tasks in the field of correct and objective testing of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. Existing approaches, despite their exhaustive theoretical justification, can give results that differ by an order of magnitude under the same initial conditions. Most of the input parameters for such methods are determined by the researcher intuitively or on the basis of relevant literature data in the subject area. Such uncertainty at the research planning stage is associated with a high risk of obtaining biased results, which is especially important to take into account when using AI algorithms for medical diagnosis. Within the framework of this work, an empirical study of the value of the minimum required sample size of radiology diagnostic studies to obtain an objective value of the AUROC metric was conducted. An algorithm for calculating the threshold value of sample size according to the criterion of no statistically significant changes in the metric value in case of increasing this size was developed and implemented in software format. Using datasets containing the results of testing of AI algorithms on mammographic and radiographic studies with the total volume of more than 300 thousand, the empirical threshold for the sample size from 30 to 25 thousand studies with different relative content of pathology—from 10 to 90%—was calculated. The proposed algorithm allows obtaining results invariant to the balance of classes in the sample, the target value of AUROC, the modality of studies, and the AI algorithm. The empirical value of the minimum sufficient sample size for testing the AI algorithm for binary classification, obtained by analyzing over 2 million estimated values, is 400 studies. The results can be used to solve the problems of development and testing of diagnostic tools, including AI algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":531,"journal":{"name":"Doklady Mathematics","volume":"110 1 supplement","pages":"S62 - S74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1134/S1064562424602063.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Doklady Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1064562424602063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Calculation of sample size is one of the basic tasks in the field of correct and objective testing of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. Existing approaches, despite their exhaustive theoretical justification, can give results that differ by an order of magnitude under the same initial conditions. Most of the input parameters for such methods are determined by the researcher intuitively or on the basis of relevant literature data in the subject area. Such uncertainty at the research planning stage is associated with a high risk of obtaining biased results, which is especially important to take into account when using AI algorithms for medical diagnosis. Within the framework of this work, an empirical study of the value of the minimum required sample size of radiology diagnostic studies to obtain an objective value of the AUROC metric was conducted. An algorithm for calculating the threshold value of sample size according to the criterion of no statistically significant changes in the metric value in case of increasing this size was developed and implemented in software format. Using datasets containing the results of testing of AI algorithms on mammographic and radiographic studies with the total volume of more than 300 thousand, the empirical threshold for the sample size from 30 to 25 thousand studies with different relative content of pathology—from 10 to 90%—was calculated. The proposed algorithm allows obtaining results invariant to the balance of classes in the sample, the target value of AUROC, the modality of studies, and the AI algorithm. The empirical value of the minimum sufficient sample size for testing the AI algorithm for binary classification, obtained by analyzing over 2 million estimated values, is 400 studies. The results can be used to solve the problems of development and testing of diagnostic tools, including AI algorithms.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Doklady Mathematics
Doklady Mathematics 数学-数学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
39
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Doklady Mathematics is a journal of the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences. It contains English translations of papers published in Doklady Akademii Nauk (Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences), which was founded in 1933 and is published 36 times a year. Doklady Mathematics includes the materials from the following areas: mathematics, mathematical physics, computer science, control theory, and computers. It publishes brief scientific reports on previously unpublished significant new research in mathematics and its applications. The main contributors to the journal are Members of the RAS, Corresponding Members of the RAS, and scientists from the former Soviet Union and other foreign countries. Among the contributors are the outstanding Russian mathematicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信