Medicare Makeover: A Response to Peer Commentaries.

Colleen M Flood, Bryan Thomas
{"title":"Medicare Makeover: A Response to Peer Commentaries.","authors":"Colleen M Flood, Bryan Thomas","doi":"10.12927/hcpap.2025.27559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In responding to the <i>Canada Health Act</i> reforms proposed in Medicare Makeover, our peers provide valuable insights and suggestions. We appreciate, for instance, underscoring complexities inherent in implementing our call for evidence-based processes to define publicly-funded services and concerns regarding variation in accessibility and coverage standards across Canada. While some responses advocate for greater federal direction, we argue that fractured accountabilities have contributed to current challenges. It is essential that reforms establish a clear line of accountability: the federal government must ensure provinces, territories and Indigenous governments implement transparent processes to set standards for reasonable access and coverage and, in turn, provincial, territorial and Indigenous governments must be accountable for delivering on those standards to their voters.</p>","PeriodicalId":101342,"journal":{"name":"HealthcarePapers","volume":"22 3","pages":"69-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HealthcarePapers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpap.2025.27559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In responding to the Canada Health Act reforms proposed in Medicare Makeover, our peers provide valuable insights and suggestions. We appreciate, for instance, underscoring complexities inherent in implementing our call for evidence-based processes to define publicly-funded services and concerns regarding variation in accessibility and coverage standards across Canada. While some responses advocate for greater federal direction, we argue that fractured accountabilities have contributed to current challenges. It is essential that reforms establish a clear line of accountability: the federal government must ensure provinces, territories and Indigenous governments implement transparent processes to set standards for reasonable access and coverage and, in turn, provincial, territorial and Indigenous governments must be accountable for delivering on those standards to their voters.

医疗改革:对同行评论的回应。
针对《医疗保险改革》中提出的加拿大健康法改革,我们的同行提供了宝贵的见解和建议。例如,我们赞赏强调执行我们的呼吁所固有的复杂性,即以证据为基础的过程来定义公共资助的服务,以及对加拿大各地可及性和覆盖标准差异的关注。虽然一些回应主张更大的联邦指导,但我们认为,支离破碎的问责制导致了当前的挑战。改革必须建立明确的问责制:联邦政府必须确保各省、地区和土著政府实施透明的程序,为合理的获取和覆盖制定标准,反过来,省、地区和土著政府必须负责向选民提供这些标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信