Kristina R Dahlstrom, Andrew T Day, Victor M Alvarez, Samantha R Chirinos, Giselle Santillana, Ming Guo, Karen S Anderson, Erich M Sturgis
{"title":"Circulating tumor HPV DNA, antibodies to HPV16 early proteins, and oral HPV16 DNA as biomarkers for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer screening.","authors":"Kristina R Dahlstrom, Andrew T Day, Victor M Alvarez, Samantha R Chirinos, Giselle Santillana, Ming Guo, Karen S Anderson, Erich M Sturgis","doi":"10.1177/18758592241313323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundOropharyngeal cancer rates continue to rise with no effective screening method. Persistent oral oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV), antibodies to HPV16 early (E) oncoproteins, and circulating tumor HPV DNA (ctHPVDNA) are biomarkers that show promise for use in HPV-related cancer screening.ObjectiveTo assess the prevalence of biomarkers for HPV-related cancer and their agreement in middle-aged men.MethodsMen aged 50-64 years from the general population provided oral rinse and blood samples as well as information about demographics, tobacco/alcohol exposure, sexual behavior, and HPV-related disease history. Oral rinse was tested for HPV16 DNA and plasma was tested for HPV16 E antibodies and ctHPVDNA using a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)-based assay that measures circulating tumor tissue modified viral (TTMV)-HPV DNA (NavDx, Naveris, Inc.). We calculated frequency distributions of variables of interest and agreement between the biomarkers.ResultsWe enrolled 1045 subjects between April 2017 and April 2024. The 954 subjects with results for all three biomarkers were included in the analysis. The prevalence was 4.9% for oral HPV16 DNA, 0.7% for HPV16 E antibodies, and 0.5% for TTMV-HPV DNA.ConclusionsThe low prevalence of all three biomarkers shows their potential to identify high-risk individuals eligible for further clinical HPV-related cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":56320,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Biomarkers","volume":"42 1","pages":"18758592241313323"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18758592241313323","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundOropharyngeal cancer rates continue to rise with no effective screening method. Persistent oral oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV), antibodies to HPV16 early (E) oncoproteins, and circulating tumor HPV DNA (ctHPVDNA) are biomarkers that show promise for use in HPV-related cancer screening.ObjectiveTo assess the prevalence of biomarkers for HPV-related cancer and their agreement in middle-aged men.MethodsMen aged 50-64 years from the general population provided oral rinse and blood samples as well as information about demographics, tobacco/alcohol exposure, sexual behavior, and HPV-related disease history. Oral rinse was tested for HPV16 DNA and plasma was tested for HPV16 E antibodies and ctHPVDNA using a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)-based assay that measures circulating tumor tissue modified viral (TTMV)-HPV DNA (NavDx, Naveris, Inc.). We calculated frequency distributions of variables of interest and agreement between the biomarkers.ResultsWe enrolled 1045 subjects between April 2017 and April 2024. The 954 subjects with results for all three biomarkers were included in the analysis. The prevalence was 4.9% for oral HPV16 DNA, 0.7% for HPV16 E antibodies, and 0.5% for TTMV-HPV DNA.ConclusionsThe low prevalence of all three biomarkers shows their potential to identify high-risk individuals eligible for further clinical HPV-related cancer screening.
期刊介绍:
Concentrating on molecular biomarkers in cancer research, Cancer Biomarkers publishes original research findings (and reviews solicited by the editor) on the subject of the identification of markers associated with the disease processes whether or not they are an integral part of the pathological lesion.
The disease markers may include, but are not limited to, genomic, epigenomic, proteomics, cellular and morphologic, and genetic factors predisposing to the disease or indicating the occurrence of the disease. Manuscripts on these factors or biomarkers, either in altered forms, abnormal concentrations or with abnormal tissue distribution leading to disease causation will be accepted.