Associations of specific emotion and symptom mindsets with clinical symptoms, treatment attitudes, and treatment preference.

IF 2.3 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY

Anxiety Stress and Coping Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1080/10615806.2025.2480115

Elizabeth T Kneeland, Mabel Shanahan, Chéla Cunningham, Isabella Lattuada, Jason Moser, Hans S Schroder

{"title":"Associations of specific emotion and symptom mindsets with clinical symptoms, treatment attitudes, and treatment preference.","authors":"Elizabeth T Kneeland, Mabel Shanahan, Chéla Cunningham, Isabella Lattuada, Jason Moser, Hans S Schroder","doi":"10.1080/10615806.2025.2480115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: One psychological factor that relates to individuals' level of emotional distress and how they view coping with that distress is the mindsets they hold about the nature of emotions and clinical symptoms.Method: The current study (N = 978 undergraduate students; Mage = 19.01 years, 71.9% female, 68.9% White/Caucasian) used repeated measures General Linear Models (GLMs) and multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVAs) to examine the relationships between mindsets in specific domains - malleability, function, and individual aspects of emotions - and which mindsets in each domain have the strongest relationships with clinical symptoms, treatment attitudes, and treatment preference. This statistical approach allows us to examine the relative strength in the relationships between specific mindsets within a particular domain (e.g., malleability) and study outcomes.Results: When all mindsets in a specific domain (e.g., malleability, function, or specific facet of emotion) were included as simultaneous predictors in analyses, certain mindsets held specific relationships with outcomes. For example, more malleable mindsets about anxiety had the stronger relationships with anxiety symptoms.Conclusion: The current study clarified that certain mindsets held the strongest relationship with specific outcomes, such as the anxiety malleability mindset with anxiety symptoms, while certain mindsets had equally strong relationships with symptoms and treatment attitudes.","PeriodicalId":51415,"journal":{"name":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2025.2480115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One psychological factor that relates to individuals' level of emotional distress and how they view coping with that distress is the mindsets they hold about the nature of emotions and clinical symptoms.

Method: The current study (N = 978 undergraduate students; M_age= 19.01 years, 71.9% female, 68.9% White/Caucasian) used repeated measures General Linear Models (GLMs) and multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVAs) to examine the relationships between mindsets in specific domains - malleability, function, and individual aspects of emotions - and which mindsets in each domain have the strongest relationships with clinical symptoms, treatment attitudes, and treatment preference. This statistical approach allows us to examine the relative strength in the relationships between specific mindsets within a particular domain (e.g., malleability) and study outcomes.

Results: When all mindsets in a specific domain (e.g., malleability, function, or specific facet of emotion) were included as simultaneous predictors in analyses, certain mindsets held specific relationships with outcomes. For example, more malleable mindsets about anxiety had the stronger relationships with anxiety symptoms.

Conclusion: The current study clarified that certain mindsets held the strongest relationship with specific outcomes, such as the anxiety malleability mindset with anxiety symptoms, while certain mindsets had equally strong relationships with symptoms and treatment attitudes.

查看原文本刊更多论文

背景：与个人情绪困扰程度以及如何应对这种困扰有关的一个心理因素是他们对情绪性质和临床症状所持的心态：本研究（人数 = 978 名本科生；年龄 = 19.01 岁，71.9% 为女性，68.9% 为白人/高加索人）使用了重复测量一般线性模型（GLMs）和多元方差分析（MANOVA）来检验特定领域（情绪的可塑性、功能和个体方面）中心态之间的关系，以及每个领域中哪些心态与临床症状、治疗态度和治疗偏好的关系最密切。通过这种统计方法，我们可以研究特定领域中的特定心态（如可塑性）与研究结果之间的相对强弱关系：结果：当特定领域中的所有思维方式（如可塑性、功能或情绪的特定方面）被同时作为预测因素纳入分析时，某些思维方式与结果之间存在特定的关系。例如，可塑性更强的焦虑心态与焦虑症状的关系更密切：目前的研究表明，某些心态与特定结果的关系最为密切，如焦虑可塑性心态与焦虑症状的关系，而某些心态与症状和治疗态度的关系同样密切。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Anxiety Stress and Coping Multiple-

CiteScore

7.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： This journal provides a forum for scientific, theoretically important, and clinically significant research reports and conceptual contributions. It deals with experimental and field studies on anxiety dimensions and stress and coping processes, but also with related topics such as the antecedents and consequences of stress and emotion. We also encourage submissions contributing to the understanding of the relationship between psychological and physiological processes, specific for stress and anxiety. Manuscripts should report novel findings that are of interest to an international readership. While the journal is open to a diversity of articles.