Open, laparoscopic, and robotic radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Comparing outcomes and the tetrafecta as a composite marker of surgery quality.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Maxwell Sandberg, Parth Udayan Thakker, Rory Ritts, Megan Escott, Mary Namugosa, Adam Cohen, Stephen Tranchina, Kimberly Waggener, Madeline Snipes, XiXi Yi, Justin Refugia, Gregory Russell, Timothy O'Rourke, Ashok Kumar Hemal
{"title":"Open, laparoscopic, and robotic radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Comparing outcomes and the tetrafecta as a composite marker of surgery quality.","authors":"Maxwell Sandberg, Parth Udayan Thakker, Rory Ritts, Megan Escott, Mary Namugosa, Adam Cohen, Stephen Tranchina, Kimberly Waggener, Madeline Snipes, XiXi Yi, Justin Refugia, Gregory Russell, Timothy O'Rourke, Ashok Kumar Hemal","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes and costs between robotic radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LNU), and open radical nephroureterectomy (ONU), and to assess the relevance of the tetrafecta as a composite outcome on survival parameters after nephroureterectomy (NU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Operative and oncologic followup data was retrospectively collected on patients who underwent NU from 2006-2022 at our institution. The tetrafecta was defined as a true bladder cuff, lymph node dissection, negative surgical margins, and no postoperative complications. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the impact of surgical approach on survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 248 patients were included in the analysis (145 RNU, 61 LNU, and 42 ONU). The complication rate differed by approach and was lowest in RNU (p<0.01). Cancer-specific survival (CSS) differed between ONU and RNU patients, with ONU patients 2.51 times as likely to die from their cancer. Retroperitoneal recurrence-free survival (RPFS) differed between ONU and RNU patients, with ONU patients 7.22 times more likely to experience a retroperitoneal recurrence (p=0.0013). Variable surgical costs were lower in LNU compared to ONU (p=0.028) and direct inpatient hospital cost was lowest with RNU (p<0.01). Eighty-one patients met criteria for the tetrafecta. RNU patients were more likely to achieve the tetrafecta compared to LNU (p<0.01) and ONU (p<0.01) patients. No differences in survival parameters existed between patients who did and did not achieve the tetrafecta.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most oncologic outcomes after NU do not differ by approach on long-term followup; however, CSS and RPFS appear to differ between RNU and ONU. ONU has traditionally been considered the approach with the lowest cost; however, our analysis demonstrates both RNU and LNU require lower costs than ONU, depending on the cost parameter analyzed. Among all approaches, the tetrafecta is best achieved with RNU.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes and costs between robotic radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LNU), and open radical nephroureterectomy (ONU), and to assess the relevance of the tetrafecta as a composite outcome on survival parameters after nephroureterectomy (NU).

Methods: Operative and oncologic followup data was retrospectively collected on patients who underwent NU from 2006-2022 at our institution. The tetrafecta was defined as a true bladder cuff, lymph node dissection, negative surgical margins, and no postoperative complications. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the impact of surgical approach on survival outcomes.

Results: A total of 248 patients were included in the analysis (145 RNU, 61 LNU, and 42 ONU). The complication rate differed by approach and was lowest in RNU (p<0.01). Cancer-specific survival (CSS) differed between ONU and RNU patients, with ONU patients 2.51 times as likely to die from their cancer. Retroperitoneal recurrence-free survival (RPFS) differed between ONU and RNU patients, with ONU patients 7.22 times more likely to experience a retroperitoneal recurrence (p=0.0013). Variable surgical costs were lower in LNU compared to ONU (p=0.028) and direct inpatient hospital cost was lowest with RNU (p<0.01). Eighty-one patients met criteria for the tetrafecta. RNU patients were more likely to achieve the tetrafecta compared to LNU (p<0.01) and ONU (p<0.01) patients. No differences in survival parameters existed between patients who did and did not achieve the tetrafecta.

Conclusions: Most oncologic outcomes after NU do not differ by approach on long-term followup; however, CSS and RPFS appear to differ between RNU and ONU. ONU has traditionally been considered the approach with the lowest cost; however, our analysis demonstrates both RNU and LNU require lower costs than ONU, depending on the cost parameter analyzed. Among all approaches, the tetrafecta is best achieved with RNU.

开腹、腹腔镜和机器人根治性肾切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌:比较疗效和作为手术质量综合指标的四项指标。
导言:本研究旨在比较机器人根治性肾切除术(RNU)、腹腔镜根治性肾切除术(LNU)和开腹根治性肾切除术(ONU)的手术效果和费用,并评估四联症作为肾切除术(NU)后生存参数的综合结果的相关性:方法:我们回顾性地收集了2006-2022年在本院接受肾切除术的患者的手术和肿瘤随访数据。四种情况的定义是:真正的膀胱袖带、淋巴结清扫、手术切缘阴性、术后无并发症。采用Cox比例危害回归评估手术方法对生存结果的影响:共有 248 名患者(145 名 RNU、61 名 LNU 和 42 名 ONU)被纳入分析。不同手术方式的并发症发生率不同,RNU的并发症发生率最低(p结论:NU术后的大多数肿瘤结果在长期随访中并不因方法而异;但是,RNU和ONU的CSS和RPFS似乎有所不同。ONU 传统上被认为是成本最低的方法;但我们的分析表明,根据分析的成本参数,RNU 和 LNU 所需的成本均低于 ONU。在所有方法中,RNU 最能实现四分法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信