Assessing Canadian medical students' confidence in undergraduate urologic training and preferences for teaching methods.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Othmane Zekraoui, Sepehr Niakani, Mahmoud Moustafa, Mohamad Baker Berjaoui, Abbas Guennoun, Dean Elterman, Bilal Chughtai, David-Dan Nguyen, David Bouhadana, Naeem Bhojani
{"title":"Assessing Canadian medical students' confidence in undergraduate urologic training and preferences for teaching methods.","authors":"Othmane Zekraoui, Sepehr Niakani, Mahmoud Moustafa, Mohamad Baker Berjaoui, Abbas Guennoun, Dean Elterman, Bilal Chughtai, David-Dan Nguyen, David Bouhadana, Naeem Bhojani","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Given the aging population, urologic conditions are increasingly prevalent in primary care, necessitating well-prepared medical graduates to recognize and manage essential complaints. This study assessed medical students' confidence in managing common urologic conditions, identified preferred teaching methods, and examined the role of the Canadian Undergraduate Urological Curriculum (CanUUC) in their education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was distributed to third- and fourth-year Canadian medical students, assessing their self-confidence in history taking, diagnosis, management planning, and physical examination for 12 urologic conditions. The survey also explored preferred teaching methods and awareness of the CanUUC. Statistical analysis included ANOVA and t-tests to determine significant differences in confidence across various factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 117 medical students and 10 first-year urology residents responded. Students felt equally confident about taking histories (3.51±1.19), proposing diagnoses (3.38±1.19), and performing physical examinations (3.58±1.16) while demonstrating lower confidence (p<0.001) for management planning (3.16±1.25). Confidence was highest for urinary tract infections and lowest for male infertility. Furthermore, students who completed urology rotations reported higher confidence in history taking (3.67±0.69, p=0.003) and management planning (3.35±0.66, p=0.003). Direct clinical exposure, simulations, and case-based discussions were the preferred learning methods. Only seven (6%) students were aware of CanUUC, with five (4.3%) using it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical students have moderate confidence in handling urologic conditions, with higher comfort among those who completed urology rotations. Implementing targeted curriculum enhancements and integrating resources like the CanUUC could address these educational gaps and lead to improved patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Given the aging population, urologic conditions are increasingly prevalent in primary care, necessitating well-prepared medical graduates to recognize and manage essential complaints. This study assessed medical students' confidence in managing common urologic conditions, identified preferred teaching methods, and examined the role of the Canadian Undergraduate Urological Curriculum (CanUUC) in their education.

Methods: A survey was distributed to third- and fourth-year Canadian medical students, assessing their self-confidence in history taking, diagnosis, management planning, and physical examination for 12 urologic conditions. The survey also explored preferred teaching methods and awareness of the CanUUC. Statistical analysis included ANOVA and t-tests to determine significant differences in confidence across various factors.

Results: A total of 117 medical students and 10 first-year urology residents responded. Students felt equally confident about taking histories (3.51±1.19), proposing diagnoses (3.38±1.19), and performing physical examinations (3.58±1.16) while demonstrating lower confidence (p<0.001) for management planning (3.16±1.25). Confidence was highest for urinary tract infections and lowest for male infertility. Furthermore, students who completed urology rotations reported higher confidence in history taking (3.67±0.69, p=0.003) and management planning (3.35±0.66, p=0.003). Direct clinical exposure, simulations, and case-based discussions were the preferred learning methods. Only seven (6%) students were aware of CanUUC, with five (4.3%) using it.

Conclusions: Medical students have moderate confidence in handling urologic conditions, with higher comfort among those who completed urology rotations. Implementing targeted curriculum enhancements and integrating resources like the CanUUC could address these educational gaps and lead to improved patient outcomes.

简介:随着人口老龄化的加剧,泌尿科疾病在初级保健中越来越普遍,这就要求准备充分的医学毕业生能够识别和处理基本的主诉。本研究评估了医科学生对处理常见泌尿科疾病的信心,确定了首选的教学方法,并考察了加拿大本科泌尿科课程(CanUUC)在其教育中的作用:向加拿大医学专业三年级和四年级学生发放了一份调查问卷,评估他们在病史采集、诊断、处理计划和 12 种泌尿科疾病的体格检查方面的自信心。调查还探究了学生喜欢的教学方法和对加拿大泌尿外科大学的认识。统计分析包括方差分析和 t 检验,以确定不同因素在自信心方面的显著差异:共有 117 名医学生和 10 名泌尿科一年级住院医师参与了调查。学生对采集病史(3.51±1.19)、提出诊断(3.38±1.19)和进行体格检查(3.58±1.16)的信心相同,而对进行体格检查(3.58±1.16)的信心较低(p结论:医学生对处理泌尿系统疾病的信心一般:医学生对处理泌尿科疾病的信心一般,完成泌尿科轮转的医学生对处理泌尿科疾病的信心更高。实施有针对性的课程强化和整合资源(如 CanUUC)可以解决这些教育差距,从而改善患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信