Permutation Tests Are a Useful Alternative Approach for Statistical Hypothesis Testing in Small Sample Sizes.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Theresa Unseld, Lisa Ruckerbauer, Benjamin Mayer
{"title":"Permutation Tests Are a Useful Alternative Approach for Statistical Hypothesis Testing in Small Sample Sizes.","authors":"Theresa Unseld, Lisa Ruckerbauer, Benjamin Mayer","doi":"10.1177/02611929251326882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Results interpretation and statistical analysis of animal study data is challenging, since the sample sizes involved are usually very small. The application of frequently used approaches to statistical hypothesis testing, e.g. <i>t</i>-tests or ANOVA methods, rely on specific distributional assumptions being satisfied. It can be hard to reliably assess these assumptions in animal studies with group sizes of usually less than ten animals. Non-parametric analysis methods might be considered as an alternative, but it is well-known that these approaches have lower statistical power in some situations. Following the Three Rs principles, it would be desirable to apply a class of statistical tests that is able to deal with a small number of observations, without the need for specific distributional assumptions. Thus, in this paper, we assess the application of permutation tests which seem to be able to meet both the above requirements. The performance of these permutation tests was compared with standard statistical tests by means of four real-world data examples from animal studies. The results demonstrated that permutation tests have good computational properties, leading to the conclusion that they could be a useful alternative approach when analysing small sample size animal study data for which distributional assumptions may not hold.</p>","PeriodicalId":55577,"journal":{"name":"Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals","volume":" ","pages":"2611929251326882"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929251326882","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Results interpretation and statistical analysis of animal study data is challenging, since the sample sizes involved are usually very small. The application of frequently used approaches to statistical hypothesis testing, e.g. t-tests or ANOVA methods, rely on specific distributional assumptions being satisfied. It can be hard to reliably assess these assumptions in animal studies with group sizes of usually less than ten animals. Non-parametric analysis methods might be considered as an alternative, but it is well-known that these approaches have lower statistical power in some situations. Following the Three Rs principles, it would be desirable to apply a class of statistical tests that is able to deal with a small number of observations, without the need for specific distributional assumptions. Thus, in this paper, we assess the application of permutation tests which seem to be able to meet both the above requirements. The performance of these permutation tests was compared with standard statistical tests by means of four real-world data examples from animal studies. The results demonstrated that permutation tests have good computational properties, leading to the conclusion that they could be a useful alternative approach when analysing small sample size animal study data for which distributional assumptions may not hold.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>18 weeks
期刊介绍: Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (ATLA) is a peer-reviewed journal, intended to cover all aspects of the development, validation, implementation and use of alternatives to laboratory animals in biomedical research and toxicity testing. In addition to the replacement of animals, it also covers work that aims to reduce the number of animals used and refine the in vivo experiments that are still carried out.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信