Tissue Concentrations of Vancomycin Achieved by Regional Perfusion Versus Intravenous Prophylaxis in Upper Extremity Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Nathaniel B Hinckley, Molly C Klanderman, Kevin J Renfree
{"title":"Tissue Concentrations of Vancomycin Achieved by Regional Perfusion Versus Intravenous Prophylaxis in Upper Extremity Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Nathaniel B Hinckley, Molly C Klanderman, Kevin J Renfree","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prior studies on intraosseous administration of vancomycin in the lower extremity have demonstrated higher tissue drug concentrations using lower doses compared with systemic intravenous administration. Our purpose was to quantify and compare vancomycin concentrations in bone and soft tissue of the hand and wrist after regional perfusion and after systemic administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients undergoing an upper extremity reconstructive procedure requiring removal of bone were randomized to regional intravenous perfusion of vancomycin (125 mg in 50 mL normal saline) or systemic intravenous administration of vancomycin (1 g). Samples of subcutaneous fat and bone were collected 5-10 minutes after skin incision and 20-25 minutes after skin incision, and fat was collected at closure. The primary outcome was the difference in bone and fat tissue concentrations between groups. The secondary outcome was complications related to the method of delivery of vancomycin in each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean tissue concentrations in fat at each time point were 114.9 μg/g (range, 25.0-333.8), 117.2 μg/g (range, 57.1-220.3), and 150.1 μg/g (range, 4.6-386.4) in the regional perfusion group and 3.9 μg/g (range, 1.5-8.4), 5.2 μg/g (range, 1.6-18.6), and 4.5 μg/g (range, 1.4-8.1) in the systemic group, respectively. Mean bone concentrations were 107.0 μg/g (range, 27.4-269.1) and 117.4 μg/g (range, 57.1-220.3) in the regional perfusion group and 13.0 μg/g (range, 6.1-20.3) (P = .002) and 14.9 μg/g (range, 8.7-22.9) in the systemic group, respectively. A fitted linear mixed model showed the average tissue concentration was 109 μg/g higher in the regional group compared with systemic administration. There were no complications requiring reoperation in either group within the 12-week follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regional intravenous perfusion of vancomycin in the upper extremity achieves higher levels of antibiotic concentration than systemic intravenous administration of a much greater dose. These preliminary results warrant further evaluation of this method for the prevention and treatment of infections in the upper extremity.</p><p><strong>Type of study/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic II.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.02.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Prior studies on intraosseous administration of vancomycin in the lower extremity have demonstrated higher tissue drug concentrations using lower doses compared with systemic intravenous administration. Our purpose was to quantify and compare vancomycin concentrations in bone and soft tissue of the hand and wrist after regional perfusion and after systemic administration.

Methods: Twenty patients undergoing an upper extremity reconstructive procedure requiring removal of bone were randomized to regional intravenous perfusion of vancomycin (125 mg in 50 mL normal saline) or systemic intravenous administration of vancomycin (1 g). Samples of subcutaneous fat and bone were collected 5-10 minutes after skin incision and 20-25 minutes after skin incision, and fat was collected at closure. The primary outcome was the difference in bone and fat tissue concentrations between groups. The secondary outcome was complications related to the method of delivery of vancomycin in each group.

Results: Mean tissue concentrations in fat at each time point were 114.9 μg/g (range, 25.0-333.8), 117.2 μg/g (range, 57.1-220.3), and 150.1 μg/g (range, 4.6-386.4) in the regional perfusion group and 3.9 μg/g (range, 1.5-8.4), 5.2 μg/g (range, 1.6-18.6), and 4.5 μg/g (range, 1.4-8.1) in the systemic group, respectively. Mean bone concentrations were 107.0 μg/g (range, 27.4-269.1) and 117.4 μg/g (range, 57.1-220.3) in the regional perfusion group and 13.0 μg/g (range, 6.1-20.3) (P = .002) and 14.9 μg/g (range, 8.7-22.9) in the systemic group, respectively. A fitted linear mixed model showed the average tissue concentration was 109 μg/g higher in the regional group compared with systemic administration. There were no complications requiring reoperation in either group within the 12-week follow-up period.

Conclusions: Regional intravenous perfusion of vancomycin in the upper extremity achieves higher levels of antibiotic concentration than systemic intravenous administration of a much greater dose. These preliminary results warrant further evaluation of this method for the prevention and treatment of infections in the upper extremity.

Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic II.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信