Body Mass Index, Comorbidities, and Ambulatory Care Visits: The REGARDS Study.

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.037034
Emily B Levitan, Aowen Zhu, Vera Bittner, Todd M Brown, Michael E Farkouh, Mariam Girguis, Lei Huang, Elizabeth A Jackson, Suzanne E Judd, Shannon Rhodes, Monika M Safford, Jennifer L Strande, Min-Jung Wang, Mark Woodward, D Leann Long
{"title":"Body Mass Index, Comorbidities, and Ambulatory Care Visits: The REGARDS Study.","authors":"Emily B Levitan, Aowen Zhu, Vera Bittner, Todd M Brown, Michael E Farkouh, Mariam Girguis, Lei Huang, Elizabeth A Jackson, Suzanne E Judd, Shannon Rhodes, Monika M Safford, Jennifer L Strande, Min-Jung Wang, Mark Woodward, D Leann Long","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.037034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with obesity have more ambulatory care usage than individuals with normal weight and overweight. There is limited information on whether this is consistent across provider specialties and whether comorbidities explain the associations.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Among REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) cohort study participants with Medicare fee-for-service coverage (n=9648), we identified ambulatory visits over 5 years. We used marginalized zero-inflated Poisson models to calculate ratios of means by body mass index (BMI), adjusted for demographics and health behaviors, and inverse odds weighting to evaluate mediation by diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, stroke, coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, depressive symptoms, cancer, arthritis, and sleep apnea. The mean age of participants was 71.7±7.3 years, 35.1% were Black individuals and 64.9% White individuals, and 51.1% were women. Participants had a mean of 37.8 total, 16.0 primary care, 3.4 cardiology, 1.9 orthopedics, 0.9 pulmonology, and 0.4 endocrinology visits. Compared with individuals with BMI 18.5 to <25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (n=2613), participants with BMI ≥35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (n=1259) had 23% (95% CI, 21%-24%) more ambulatory visits. Participants with BMI ≥35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> had 26% more primary care, 20% more cardiology, 74% more orthopedics, 62% more pulmonology, and 85% more endocrinology visits. Comorbidities partly explained associations with overall, primary care, and orthopedics visits (39%, 38%, and 15%, respectively) and largely explained associations with cardiology, pulmonology, and endocrinology visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding which specialty visits are associated with higher BMI can help with workforce planning and allocation of resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e037034"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.037034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals with obesity have more ambulatory care usage than individuals with normal weight and overweight. There is limited information on whether this is consistent across provider specialties and whether comorbidities explain the associations.

Methods and results: Among REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) cohort study participants with Medicare fee-for-service coverage (n=9648), we identified ambulatory visits over 5 years. We used marginalized zero-inflated Poisson models to calculate ratios of means by body mass index (BMI), adjusted for demographics and health behaviors, and inverse odds weighting to evaluate mediation by diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, stroke, coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, depressive symptoms, cancer, arthritis, and sleep apnea. The mean age of participants was 71.7±7.3 years, 35.1% were Black individuals and 64.9% White individuals, and 51.1% were women. Participants had a mean of 37.8 total, 16.0 primary care, 3.4 cardiology, 1.9 orthopedics, 0.9 pulmonology, and 0.4 endocrinology visits. Compared with individuals with BMI 18.5 to <25 kg/m2 (n=2613), participants with BMI ≥35 kg/m2 (n=1259) had 23% (95% CI, 21%-24%) more ambulatory visits. Participants with BMI ≥35 kg/m2 had 26% more primary care, 20% more cardiology, 74% more orthopedics, 62% more pulmonology, and 85% more endocrinology visits. Comorbidities partly explained associations with overall, primary care, and orthopedics visits (39%, 38%, and 15%, respectively) and largely explained associations with cardiology, pulmonology, and endocrinology visits.

Conclusions: Understanding which specialty visits are associated with higher BMI can help with workforce planning and allocation of resources.

体质指数、合并症和门诊就诊:REGARDS研究。
背景:肥胖个体比正常体重和超重个体有更多的门诊护理使用。关于这种情况是否在不同专科医生之间一致以及合并症是否可以解释这种关联的信息有限。方法和结果:在医疗保险按服务收费覆盖的REGARDS(卒中的地理和种族差异原因)队列研究参与者中(n=9648),我们确定了5年以上的门诊就诊。我们使用边缘化零膨胀泊松模型计算体重指数(BMI)的均值比,调整人口统计学和健康行为,并使用反向优势加权来评估糖尿病、高血压、血脂异常、中风、冠心病、心房颤动、心力衰竭、慢性肾脏疾病、抑郁症状、癌症、关节炎和睡眠呼吸暂停的中介作用。参与者的平均年龄为71.7±7.3岁,黑人占35.1%,白人占64.9%,女性占51.1%。参与者的平均就诊次数为37.8次,初级保健16.0次,心脏病3.4次,骨科1.9次,肺科0.9次,内分泌0.4次。与BMI为18.5至2的个体(n=2613)相比,BMI≥35 kg/m2的参与者(n=1259)的门诊就诊次数多23% (95% CI, 21%-24%)。BMI≥35 kg/m2的参与者有26%的初级保健、20%的心脏病、74%的骨科、62%的肺科和85%的内分泌科就诊。合并症部分解释了与总体、初级保健和骨科就诊的关联(分别为39%、38%和15%),并在很大程度上解释了与心脏病学、肺病学和内分泌学就诊的关联。结论:了解哪些专科就诊与高BMI相关有助于人力规划和资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信