Management of patients with small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from a biomarker and surgical perspective.

Endocrine-related cancer Pub Date : 2025-04-04 Print Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1530/ERC-24-0305
Anna Vera D Verschuur, Lin Chen, Els J Nieveen van Dijkum, Claudio Luchini, Thorvardur R Halfdanarson, Seung-Mo Hong, Aatur D Singhi, Lodewijk A A Brosens, Christopher M Heaphy
{"title":"Management of patients with small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from a biomarker and surgical perspective.","authors":"Anna Vera D Verschuur, Lin Chen, Els J Nieveen van Dijkum, Claudio Luchini, Thorvardur R Halfdanarson, Seung-Mo Hong, Aatur D Singhi, Lodewijk A A Brosens, Christopher M Heaphy","doi":"10.1530/ERC-24-0305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) have an age-adjusted incidence of 1.5 per 100,000 people, with a notable rise in the incidence of small (≤2 cm) non-functional PanNETs (NF-PanNETs) in recent decades. While surgery is traditionally the preferred treatment for localized NF-PanNETs, active surveillance is now an accepted management strategy for tumors smaller than 2 cm due to their relatively benign behavior. However, this approach has not yet been fully integrated into routine clinical practice. There is considerable histopathological heterogeneity observed in NF-PanNETs, which results in significant variability in clinical presentation, behavior and treatment outcomes. Hence, tumor size alone does not provide sufficient certainty regarding a benign clinical course for decision-making. Although studies advocate for incorporating WHO grade into clinical prognostic assessments, this marker also has limitations. Several established tissue-based markers, such as ATRX and DAXX alterations, alternative lengthening of telomeres, and copy number variations, can be used for PanNET subtyping and correlate with metastatic risk. Combining these markers with traditional histopathological parameters may yield a more comprehensive and accurate prognostic assessment. This review discusses the advantages and limitations of current prognostication methods for small NF-PanNETs and highlights recently established prognostic markers, along with the requirements for their implementation into routine clinical practice. It also proposes practical solutions to address the challenges associated with the immediate integration of these biomarkers into routine care.</p>","PeriodicalId":93989,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine-related cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11997717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine-related cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-24-0305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) have an age-adjusted incidence of 1.5 per 100,000 people, with a notable rise in the incidence of small (≤2 cm) non-functional PanNETs (NF-PanNETs) in recent decades. While surgery is traditionally the preferred treatment for localized NF-PanNETs, active surveillance is now an accepted management strategy for tumors smaller than 2 cm due to their relatively benign behavior. However, this approach has not yet been fully integrated into routine clinical practice. There is considerable histopathological heterogeneity observed in NF-PanNETs, which results in significant variability in clinical presentation, behavior and treatment outcomes. Hence, tumor size alone does not provide sufficient certainty regarding a benign clinical course for decision-making. Although studies advocate for incorporating WHO grade into clinical prognostic assessments, this marker also has limitations. Several established tissue-based markers, such as ATRX and DAXX alterations, alternative lengthening of telomeres, and copy number variations, can be used for PanNET subtyping and correlate with metastatic risk. Combining these markers with traditional histopathological parameters may yield a more comprehensive and accurate prognostic assessment. This review discusses the advantages and limitations of current prognostication methods for small NF-PanNETs and highlights recently established prognostic markers, along with the requirements for their implementation into routine clinical practice. It also proposes practical solutions to address the challenges associated with the immediate integration of these biomarkers into routine care.

小胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的生物标志物和外科治疗。
胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(PanNETs)的年龄调整发病率为每10万人1.5例,近几十年来,小(≤2厘米)非功能性肿瘤(NF-PanNETs)的发病率显著上升。虽然手术传统上是局部NF-PanNETs的首选治疗方法,但由于其相对良性的行为,对于小于2厘米的肿瘤,主动监测现在是一种公认的治疗策略。然而,这种方法尚未完全纳入常规临床实践。在NF-PanNETs中观察到相当大的组织病理学异质性,这导致临床表现、行为和治疗结果的显著差异。因此,仅凭肿瘤大小并不能提供足够的确定性来判断是否为良性临床病程。尽管研究提倡将WHO分级纳入临床预后评估,但这一指标也有局限性。一些已建立的基于组织的标记,如ATRX和DAXX改变,端粒选择性延长(ALT)和拷贝数变化可用于PanNET亚型分型并与转移风险相关。将这些标志物与传统的组织病理学参数相结合,可能会产生更全面、更准确的预后评估。本综述讨论了目前用于小型NF-PanNETs的预测方法的优点和局限性,并强调了最近建立的预后标记物,以及将其应用于常规临床实践的要求。它还提出了切实可行的解决方案,以应对将这些生物标志物立即整合到常规护理中的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信