Resource Efficient Screening for Primary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease: A Proof-of-Concept Test in the MESA Cohort.

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.038504
Eva Hagberg, Elias Björnson, Martin Adiels, Anders Gummesson, Matthew Allison, Bledar Daka, Göran Bergström
{"title":"Resource Efficient Screening for Primary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease: A Proof-of-Concept Test in the MESA Cohort.","authors":"Eva Hagberg, Elias Björnson, Martin Adiels, Anders Gummesson, Matthew Allison, Bledar Daka, Göran Bergström","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.038504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The best use of cardiac imaging to guide preventive coronary heart disease (CHD) treatment is debated. Current guidelines recommend the pooled cohort equation, followed by computed tomography for coronary artery calcification (CAC) assessment. We evaluated if this approach could be simplified using a self-report risk algorithm instead of the pooled cohort equation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A gradient boosting machine model was trained on self-reported factors to calculate the probability of a high CAC score (≥100). This model was part of a self-report-based CHD preventive strategy with 3 steps: (1) calculate the probability of having a high CAC; (2) perform computed tomography for high-risk individuals; and (3) assign treatment eligibility with lipid-lowering therapy if CAC score exceeds a designated threshold. This strategy was tested using data from the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) cohort (n=4564) and compared with guidelines recommending CAC scanning for intermediate-risk individuals (pooled cohort equation, 7.5% to <20%) by evaluating CHD events over 10-year follow-up in the group defined as treatment eligible by either strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled cohort equation identified 33% of the MESA population as eligible for a CAC scan and 19% as treatment eligible, capturing 48% of all CHD events (103 of 216). The self-report strategy identified 56% of CHD events (120 of 216; <i>P</i>=0.02) with the same number of CAC scans and treatments but required health care visits for only 33% of the population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A self-report screening strategy, combined with CAC scoring, is more resource efficient and better discriminates high-risk individuals suitable for lipid-lowering therapy compared with current guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e038504"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.038504","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The best use of cardiac imaging to guide preventive coronary heart disease (CHD) treatment is debated. Current guidelines recommend the pooled cohort equation, followed by computed tomography for coronary artery calcification (CAC) assessment. We evaluated if this approach could be simplified using a self-report risk algorithm instead of the pooled cohort equation.

Methods: A gradient boosting machine model was trained on self-reported factors to calculate the probability of a high CAC score (≥100). This model was part of a self-report-based CHD preventive strategy with 3 steps: (1) calculate the probability of having a high CAC; (2) perform computed tomography for high-risk individuals; and (3) assign treatment eligibility with lipid-lowering therapy if CAC score exceeds a designated threshold. This strategy was tested using data from the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) cohort (n=4564) and compared with guidelines recommending CAC scanning for intermediate-risk individuals (pooled cohort equation, 7.5% to <20%) by evaluating CHD events over 10-year follow-up in the group defined as treatment eligible by either strategy.

Results: The pooled cohort equation identified 33% of the MESA population as eligible for a CAC scan and 19% as treatment eligible, capturing 48% of all CHD events (103 of 216). The self-report strategy identified 56% of CHD events (120 of 216; P=0.02) with the same number of CAC scans and treatments but required health care visits for only 33% of the population.

Conclusions: A self-report screening strategy, combined with CAC scoring, is more resource efficient and better discriminates high-risk individuals suitable for lipid-lowering therapy compared with current guidelines.

冠心病一级预防的资源有效筛选:MESA队列的概念验证试验
背景:心脏成像在指导预防性冠心病治疗中的最佳应用一直存在争议。目前的指南推荐合并队列方程,然后进行冠状动脉钙化(CAC)评估的计算机断层扫描。我们评估了这种方法是否可以使用自我报告风险算法而不是合并队列方程来简化。方法:基于自述因素训练梯度增强机模型,计算CAC得分高(≥100)的概率。该模型是基于自我报告的冠心病预防策略的一部分,该策略有三个步骤:(1)计算具有高CAC的概率;(2)对高危人群进行计算机断层扫描;(3)如果CAC评分超过指定阈值,则分配降脂治疗的治疗资格。使用MESA(多种族动脉粥样硬化研究)队列(n=4564)的数据对该策略进行了测试,并与推荐对中危个体进行CAC扫描的指南进行了比较(合并队列方程,7.5%至结果:合并队列方程确定33%的MESA人群符合CAC扫描条件,19%符合治疗条件,捕获了48%的冠心病事件(216例中的103例)。自我报告策略确定了56%的冠心病事件(216例中的120例;P=0.02),同样的CAC扫描和治疗次数,但只有33%的人口需要医疗保健访问。结论:与现行指南相比,自我报告筛查策略结合CAC评分更有效,更能区分适合降脂治疗的高危人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信