Resource Efficient Screening for Primary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease: A Proof-of-Concept Test in the MESA Cohort.

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Eva Hagberg, Elias Björnson, Martin Adiels, Anders Gummesson, Matthew Allison, Bledar Daka, Göran Bergström
{"title":"Resource Efficient Screening for Primary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease: A Proof-of-Concept Test in the MESA Cohort.","authors":"Eva Hagberg, Elias Björnson, Martin Adiels, Anders Gummesson, Matthew Allison, Bledar Daka, Göran Bergström","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.038504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The best use of cardiac imaging to guide preventive coronary heart disease (CHD) treatment is debated. Current guidelines recommend the pooled cohort equation, followed by computed tomography for coronary artery calcification (CAC) assessment. We evaluated if this approach could be simplified using a self-report risk algorithm instead of the pooled cohort equation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A gradient boosting machine model was trained on self-reported factors to calculate the probability of a high CAC score (≥100). This model was part of a self-report-based CHD preventive strategy with 3 steps: (1) calculate the probability of having a high CAC; (2) perform computed tomography for high-risk individuals; and (3) assign treatment eligibility with lipid-lowering therapy if CAC score exceeds a designated threshold. This strategy was tested using data from the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) cohort (n=4564) and compared with guidelines recommending CAC scanning for intermediate-risk individuals (pooled cohort equation, 7.5% to <20%) by evaluating CHD events over 10-year follow-up in the group defined as treatment eligible by either strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled cohort equation identified 33% of the MESA population as eligible for a CAC scan and 19% as treatment eligible, capturing 48% of all CHD events (103 of 216). The self-report strategy identified 56% of CHD events (120 of 216; <i>P</i>=0.02) with the same number of CAC scans and treatments but required health care visits for only 33% of the population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A self-report screening strategy, combined with CAC scoring, is more resource efficient and better discriminates high-risk individuals suitable for lipid-lowering therapy compared with current guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e038504"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.038504","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The best use of cardiac imaging to guide preventive coronary heart disease (CHD) treatment is debated. Current guidelines recommend the pooled cohort equation, followed by computed tomography for coronary artery calcification (CAC) assessment. We evaluated if this approach could be simplified using a self-report risk algorithm instead of the pooled cohort equation.

Methods: A gradient boosting machine model was trained on self-reported factors to calculate the probability of a high CAC score (≥100). This model was part of a self-report-based CHD preventive strategy with 3 steps: (1) calculate the probability of having a high CAC; (2) perform computed tomography for high-risk individuals; and (3) assign treatment eligibility with lipid-lowering therapy if CAC score exceeds a designated threshold. This strategy was tested using data from the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) cohort (n=4564) and compared with guidelines recommending CAC scanning for intermediate-risk individuals (pooled cohort equation, 7.5% to <20%) by evaluating CHD events over 10-year follow-up in the group defined as treatment eligible by either strategy.

Results: The pooled cohort equation identified 33% of the MESA population as eligible for a CAC scan and 19% as treatment eligible, capturing 48% of all CHD events (103 of 216). The self-report strategy identified 56% of CHD events (120 of 216; P=0.02) with the same number of CAC scans and treatments but required health care visits for only 33% of the population.

Conclusions: A self-report screening strategy, combined with CAC scoring, is more resource efficient and better discriminates high-risk individuals suitable for lipid-lowering therapy compared with current guidelines.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信