Surgical dislocation of the hip without trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of bone tumors around the hip.

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Tomas Zamora, Antonia Gehrung, Ianiv Klaber, Maximiliano Carmona, Daniel Schweitzer, Eduardo Botello
{"title":"Surgical dislocation of the hip without trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of bone tumors around the hip.","authors":"Tomas Zamora, Antonia Gehrung, Ianiv Klaber, Maximiliano Carmona, Daniel Schweitzer, Eduardo Botello","doi":"10.1007/s00590-025-04258-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Bone tumors around the hip pose significant surgical challenges. While surgical dislocation with a trochanteric flip osteotomy through a posterior approach is commonly used, it is associated with known complications. This study is the first to report outcomes using surgical hip dislocation without a trochanteric osteotomy for this purpose. We evaluated early to long-term outcomes of this approach and compared results between patients undergoing extensive curettage with adjuvants and those undergoing simple excision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen patients (18 hips) with benign or intermediate bone and synovial tumors were treated using surgical dislocation without a trochanteric flip osteotomy. Patients had a minimum follow-up of 12 months (median 3.6 years, range 1-11 years). Outcomes included local recurrence, complications, functionality, and quality of life (QoL) assessed with SF-12 (mental and physical components), HOOS, TESS, and MSTS scores. Comparative analysis was performed between extensive curettage with adjuvancy and simple excision. Results All procedures were completed successfully without any local recurrences or significant complications. Patients had a median hospital stay of 3 days (ranging from 1 to 4 days), and the median follow-up duration was 3.6 years (ranging from 1 to 13 years). The mean SF-12 physical and mental health scores were 51 and 42, respectively. Additionally, the scores for HOOS, MSTS, and TESS were 74, 77%, and 86%, respectively. One patient (6%) developed osteoarthritis, while three (17%) experienced lateral hip pain managed conservatively. No significant differences were found in complications, functionality, or QoL between the extensive curettage and simple excision groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical dislocation of the hip without trochanteric osteotomy is a safe and effective alternative for excising tumors around the hip. It provides excellent exposure and achieves successful oncologic and functional outcomes. Patients requiring extensive curettage with adjuvants achieve comparable results to those treated with simple excision, offering a viable and novel surgical option for challenging cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":"35 1","pages":"129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-025-04258-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Bone tumors around the hip pose significant surgical challenges. While surgical dislocation with a trochanteric flip osteotomy through a posterior approach is commonly used, it is associated with known complications. This study is the first to report outcomes using surgical hip dislocation without a trochanteric osteotomy for this purpose. We evaluated early to long-term outcomes of this approach and compared results between patients undergoing extensive curettage with adjuvants and those undergoing simple excision.

Methods: Sixteen patients (18 hips) with benign or intermediate bone and synovial tumors were treated using surgical dislocation without a trochanteric flip osteotomy. Patients had a minimum follow-up of 12 months (median 3.6 years, range 1-11 years). Outcomes included local recurrence, complications, functionality, and quality of life (QoL) assessed with SF-12 (mental and physical components), HOOS, TESS, and MSTS scores. Comparative analysis was performed between extensive curettage with adjuvancy and simple excision. Results All procedures were completed successfully without any local recurrences or significant complications. Patients had a median hospital stay of 3 days (ranging from 1 to 4 days), and the median follow-up duration was 3.6 years (ranging from 1 to 13 years). The mean SF-12 physical and mental health scores were 51 and 42, respectively. Additionally, the scores for HOOS, MSTS, and TESS were 74, 77%, and 86%, respectively. One patient (6%) developed osteoarthritis, while three (17%) experienced lateral hip pain managed conservatively. No significant differences were found in complications, functionality, or QoL between the extensive curettage and simple excision groups.

Conclusion: Surgical dislocation of the hip without trochanteric osteotomy is a safe and effective alternative for excising tumors around the hip. It provides excellent exposure and achieves successful oncologic and functional outcomes. Patients requiring extensive curettage with adjuvants achieve comparable results to those treated with simple excision, offering a viable and novel surgical option for challenging cases.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信