Clinician and Staff Perspectives on a Social Drivers of Health Program Implementation.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Stacie M Vilendrer, Samuel C Thomas, Kim Brunisholz, Grace Ann Kumar, Ishita Singh, Nancy Song, Raj Srivastava, Sara J Singer
{"title":"Clinician and Staff Perspectives on a Social Drivers of Health Program Implementation.","authors":"Stacie M Vilendrer, Samuel C Thomas, Kim Brunisholz, Grace Ann Kumar, Ishita Singh, Nancy Song, Raj Srivastava, Sara J Singer","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2023.230316R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health systems are increasingly pursuing efforts to screen for and address social drivers of health (SDOH), the nonmedical factors that contribute to health outcomes and inequities. A large integrated health system (Intermountain Health) launched a program in 2019 to universally screen for and address SDOH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five primary care clinics within Intermountain were purposefully chosen for diversity of setting and practice type (family medicine and pediatric). We conducted 20 semistructured interviews with frontline clinicians and staff from 7/1/2020 to 9/1/2020 to explore attitudes related to feasibility, workflow processes, and facilitators and barriers to successful implementation. We conducted an inductive-deductive analysis to identify key themes and best practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five clinics conducted 16,659 SDOH patient screenings from 12/1/2019 to 11/30/2020 (705 to 7,723 screens per clinic with rates ranging from 7.4% to 52.8% per clinic). Respondent perspectives about the program were mixed. Dominant implementation barriers included staff time constraints, limited availability of social services, and reduced morale. Key facilitators included triage protocols for positive screens independent of the primary care clinician, standardizing previsit digital screening, and instilling a culture of shared ownership through education and team SDOH-focused huddles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This evaluation of an early systemwide SDOH program implementation called into question the feasibility of universal screening in primary care given staff time constraints and social service availability. Future investigations should explore the impact of targeted screening approaches in diverse clinical settings and quantifying trade offs between SDOH programs and other clinical and organizational priorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"37 6","pages":"1103-1122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230316R2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Health systems are increasingly pursuing efforts to screen for and address social drivers of health (SDOH), the nonmedical factors that contribute to health outcomes and inequities. A large integrated health system (Intermountain Health) launched a program in 2019 to universally screen for and address SDOH.

Methods: Five primary care clinics within Intermountain were purposefully chosen for diversity of setting and practice type (family medicine and pediatric). We conducted 20 semistructured interviews with frontline clinicians and staff from 7/1/2020 to 9/1/2020 to explore attitudes related to feasibility, workflow processes, and facilitators and barriers to successful implementation. We conducted an inductive-deductive analysis to identify key themes and best practices.

Results: Five clinics conducted 16,659 SDOH patient screenings from 12/1/2019 to 11/30/2020 (705 to 7,723 screens per clinic with rates ranging from 7.4% to 52.8% per clinic). Respondent perspectives about the program were mixed. Dominant implementation barriers included staff time constraints, limited availability of social services, and reduced morale. Key facilitators included triage protocols for positive screens independent of the primary care clinician, standardizing previsit digital screening, and instilling a culture of shared ownership through education and team SDOH-focused huddles.

Conclusions: This evaluation of an early systemwide SDOH program implementation called into question the feasibility of universal screening in primary care given staff time constraints and social service availability. Future investigations should explore the impact of targeted screening approaches in diverse clinical settings and quantifying trade offs between SDOH programs and other clinical and organizational priorities.

临床医生和工作人员对健康计划实施的社会驱动因素的看法。
导言:医疗系统越来越多地致力于筛查和解决健康的社会驱动因素(SDOH),即导致健康结果和不平等的非医疗因素。一家大型综合医疗系统(Intermountain Health)于 2019 年启动了一项计划,旨在普遍筛查和解决 SDOH 问题:我们特意选择了 Intermountain 内的五家初级保健诊所,以确保诊所环境和执业类型(家庭医学和儿科)的多样性。从 2020 年 1 月 7 日至 2020 年 1 月 9 日,我们对一线临床医生和员工进行了 20 次半结构式访谈,以探讨与可行性、工作流程、成功实施的促进因素和障碍相关的态度。我们进行了归纳-演绎分析,以确定关键主题和最佳实践:五家诊所在 2019 年 12 月 1 日至 2020 年 11 月 30 日期间进行了 16,659 次 SDOH 患者筛查(每家诊所 705-7,723 次,筛查率从 7.4% 到 52.8%)。受访者对该计划的看法不一。主要的实施障碍包括员工时间有限、社会服务有限以及士气低落。关键的促进因素包括:独立于初级保健临床医生的阳性筛查分流协议、诊前数字筛查的标准化,以及通过教育和以 SDOH 为重点的团队会议灌输共同拥有的文化:这项对早期全系统 SDOH 计划实施情况的评估提出了一个问题,即鉴于工作人员的时间限制和社会服务的可用性,在初级保健中进行普遍筛查是否可行。未来的调查应探索有针对性的筛查方法在不同临床环境中的影响,并量化 SDOH 计划与其他临床和组织优先事项之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信