Pooled analysis of oral vinorelbine as single agents in patients with advanced NSCLC.

IF 0.9 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Lung Cancer Management Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1080/17581966.2025.2477418
Christos Chouaid, Francesco Grossi, Christine Ta Thanh Minh, Romain Raymond, Joaquim Bosch-Barrera
{"title":"Pooled analysis of oral vinorelbine as single agents in patients with advanced NSCLC.","authors":"Christos Chouaid, Francesco Grossi, Christine Ta Thanh Minh, Romain Raymond, Joaquim Bosch-Barrera","doi":"10.1080/17581966.2025.2477418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This was a pooled analysis of data from weekly vinorelbine (VNR) treatment arms of four individual open-label, phase II studies to assess and refine the efficacy and tolerance of weekly oral VNR in a larger cohort of patients with advanced NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All patients included in this pooled analysis received oral VNR at the dose of 60 mg/m<sup>2</sup> weekly at cycle 1 (3-week cycle), followed by an increase to 80 mg/m<sup>2</sup> weekly for subsequent cycles until disease progression or toxicity. Efficacy was based on objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control rate (DCR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 247 patients were included. The ORR and DCR were 8.9% and 57.5% respectively, median PFS and OS were 3.3 and 8.5 months, respectively. Less than half (40.7%) of patients reported ≥1 serious AE (regardless of causality), with 12.3% reporting ≥1 treatment-related serious AE (grade ≥3: 11.1%). The most reported grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (17.6%), fatigue (5.8%), and decreased appetite (4.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pooled analysis showed that weekly oral VRN is a valid option, with an acceptable safety profile, in this population of patients with advanced NSCLC, confirming results from previous individual studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":43551,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer Management","volume":"14 1","pages":"2477418"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581966.2025.2477418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This was a pooled analysis of data from weekly vinorelbine (VNR) treatment arms of four individual open-label, phase II studies to assess and refine the efficacy and tolerance of weekly oral VNR in a larger cohort of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Materials and methods: All patients included in this pooled analysis received oral VNR at the dose of 60 mg/m2 weekly at cycle 1 (3-week cycle), followed by an increase to 80 mg/m2 weekly for subsequent cycles until disease progression or toxicity. Efficacy was based on objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control rate (DCR).

Results: A total of 247 patients were included. The ORR and DCR were 8.9% and 57.5% respectively, median PFS and OS were 3.3 and 8.5 months, respectively. Less than half (40.7%) of patients reported ≥1 serious AE (regardless of causality), with 12.3% reporting ≥1 treatment-related serious AE (grade ≥3: 11.1%). The most reported grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (17.6%), fatigue (5.8%), and decreased appetite (4.9%).

Conclusion: This pooled analysis showed that weekly oral VRN is a valid option, with an acceptable safety profile, in this population of patients with advanced NSCLC, confirming results from previous individual studies.

晚期 NSCLC 患者口服长春瑞滨单药的汇总分析。
研究目的这是对四项单独的开放标签II期研究中每周一次长春瑞滨(VNR)治疗组的数据进行的汇总分析,目的是在更大的晚期NSCLC患者队列中评估和完善每周口服VNR的疗效和耐受性:所有纳入本汇总分析的患者均在第一周期(3 周周期)接受每周 60 毫克/平方米剂量的口服 VNR,之后的周期剂量增至每周 80 毫克/平方米,直至疾病进展或出现毒性反应。疗效基于客观反应率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和疾病控制率(DCR):结果:共纳入 247 例患者。ORR和DCR分别为8.9%和57.5%,中位PFS和OS分别为3.3个月和8.5个月。不到一半(40.7%)的患者报告了≥1次严重AE(无论因果关系),其中12.3%的患者报告了≥1次与治疗相关的严重AE(≥3级:11.1%)。报告最多的≥3级AE为中性粒细胞减少(17.6%)、疲劳(5.8%)和食欲下降(4.9%):这项汇总分析表明,在晚期NSCLC患者中,每周口服VRN是一种有效的选择,其安全性是可以接受的,这也证实了之前个别研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lung Cancer Management
Lung Cancer Management RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信