Development of a clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome in Thai wheelchair users.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Kittipong Kitisak, Siam Tongprasert, Niracha Luengutaisilp, Phichayut Phinyo, Pichitchai Atthakomol, Kulanan Nantasukasem, Montana Buntragulpoontawee
{"title":"Development of a clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome in Thai wheelchair users.","authors":"Kittipong Kitisak, Siam Tongprasert, Niracha Luengutaisilp, Phichayut Phinyo, Pichitchai Atthakomol, Kulanan Nantasukasem, Montana Buntragulpoontawee","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2477680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop and internally validate a clinical prediction rule (CPR) for diagnosing cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) in wheelchair users. To the authors' knowledge, no prior diagnostic CPR for CuTS was developed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were wheelchair users with spinal cord injuries/lesions aged ≥20 years. All underwent clinical examinations and electrodiagnostic studies. Clinical endpoint was a confirmed CuTS diagnosis; clinical symptoms and positive electrodiagnostic criteria. The CPR was developed using multivariable logistic regression with backward elimination. Coefficients of the selected predictors were converted into scores by division of the lowest coefficient and then rounded off to the closest integer. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap technique. The model's discriminative ability and calibration performance were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven wheelchair users (142 arms) were included, 28(19.7%) arms had CuTS. Multivariable analysis identified three statistically significant predictors for the final diagnostic model: numbness or tingling in the fourth (ulnar half) and fifth fingers, grip weakness and a positive elbow flexion test; \"The CuTS-3 Diagnostic Score\" (CuTS-3). The CuTS-3 demonstrated good discriminative ability; area under the receiver operating characteristic (AuROC) = 0.88 (95%CI: 0.82-0.95) and calibration. The bootstrap performance adjusted for the estimated optimism for the clinical endpoint was 0.869 (95%CI 0.797-0.946). A cut-off score of ≥2 was suggested for diagnosis as it showed good sensitivity (89.3%) and specificity (78.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CuTS-3 is a simple and well-performing diagnostic CPR. General clinical use is encouraged to help detecting and providing timely CuTS management. In the future, the model would benefit from external validation in different population.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2477680","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and internally validate a clinical prediction rule (CPR) for diagnosing cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) in wheelchair users. To the authors' knowledge, no prior diagnostic CPR for CuTS was developed.

Methods: Participants were wheelchair users with spinal cord injuries/lesions aged ≥20 years. All underwent clinical examinations and electrodiagnostic studies. Clinical endpoint was a confirmed CuTS diagnosis; clinical symptoms and positive electrodiagnostic criteria. The CPR was developed using multivariable logistic regression with backward elimination. Coefficients of the selected predictors were converted into scores by division of the lowest coefficient and then rounded off to the closest integer. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap technique. The model's discriminative ability and calibration performance were evaluated.

Results: Seventy-seven wheelchair users (142 arms) were included, 28(19.7%) arms had CuTS. Multivariable analysis identified three statistically significant predictors for the final diagnostic model: numbness or tingling in the fourth (ulnar half) and fifth fingers, grip weakness and a positive elbow flexion test; "The CuTS-3 Diagnostic Score" (CuTS-3). The CuTS-3 demonstrated good discriminative ability; area under the receiver operating characteristic (AuROC) = 0.88 (95%CI: 0.82-0.95) and calibration. The bootstrap performance adjusted for the estimated optimism for the clinical endpoint was 0.869 (95%CI 0.797-0.946). A cut-off score of ≥2 was suggested for diagnosis as it showed good sensitivity (89.3%) and specificity (78.1%).

Conclusions: The CuTS-3 is a simple and well-performing diagnostic CPR. General clinical use is encouraged to help detecting and providing timely CuTS management. In the future, the model would benefit from external validation in different population.

目的:开发并在内部验证用于诊断轮椅使用者肘隧道综合征(CuTS)的临床预测规则(CPR)。据作者所知,此前还没有针对 CuTS 的诊断性 CPR:参与者为年龄≥20 岁的脊髓损伤/缺损的轮椅使用者。所有人都接受了临床检查和电诊断研究。临床终点为确诊的 CuTS;临床症状和阳性电诊断标准。CPR 采用多变量逻辑回归和反向排除法。所选预测因子的系数通过除以最低系数转换为分数,然后四舍五入为最接近的整数。采用引导技术进行内部验证。对模型的判别能力和校准性能进行了评估:共纳入了 77 名轮椅使用者(142 条手臂),其中 28 条手臂(19.7%)患有 CuTS。多变量分析为最终诊断模型确定了三个具有统计学意义的预测因素:第四指(尺半指)和第五指麻木或刺痛、握力减弱和肘关节屈曲测试阳性;"CuTS-3 诊断评分"(CuTS-3)。CuTS-3 表现出良好的分辨能力;接收者操作特征下面积 (AuROC) = 0.88(95%CI:0.82-0.95)和校准。根据临床终点的估计乐观程度调整后的引导性能为 0.869(95%CI 0.797-0.946)。由于其显示出良好的灵敏度(89.3%)和特异性(78.1%),因此建议将≥2分作为诊断的临界值:结论:CuTS-3 是一种简单且性能良好的 CPR 诊断方法。结论:CuTS-3 是一种简单且性能良好的心肺复苏诊断方法,鼓励临床上普遍使用,以帮助检测和及时处理 CuTS。未来,该模型将受益于在不同人群中进行的外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信