Machine-learning models for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis using neuroimaging data: survey, reproducibility, and generalizability evaluation.

Q1 Computer Science
Maryam Akhavan Aghdam, Serdar Bozdag, Fahad Saeed
{"title":"Machine-learning models for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis using neuroimaging data: survey, reproducibility, and generalizability evaluation.","authors":"Maryam Akhavan Aghdam, Serdar Bozdag, Fahad Saeed","doi":"10.1186/s40708-025-00252-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is usually made after symptoms such as short-term memory loss are exhibited, which minimizes the intervention and treatment options. The existing screening techniques cannot distinguish between stable MCI (sMCI) cases (i.e., patients who do not convert to AD for at least three years) and progressive MCI (pMCI) cases (i.e., patients who convert to AD in three years or sooner). Delayed diagnosis of AD also disproportionately affects underrepresented and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. The significant positive impact of an early diagnosis solution for AD across diverse ethno-racial and demographic groups is well-known and recognized. While advancements in high-throughput technologies have enabled the generation of vast amounts of multimodal clinical, and neuroimaging datasets related to AD, most methods utilizing these data sets for diagnostic purposes have not found their way in clinical settings. To better understand the landscape, we surveyed the major preprocessing, data management, traditional machine-learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) techniques used for diagnosing AD using neuroimaging data such as structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and positron emission tomography (PET). Once we had a good understanding of the methods available, we conducted a study to assess the reproducibility and generalizability of open-source ML models. Our evaluation shows that existing models show reduced generalizability when different cohorts of the data modality are used while controlling other computational factors. The paper concludes with a discussion of major challenges that plague ML models for AD diagnosis and biomarker discovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":37465,"journal":{"name":"Brain Informatics","volume":"12 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928716/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-025-00252-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is usually made after symptoms such as short-term memory loss are exhibited, which minimizes the intervention and treatment options. The existing screening techniques cannot distinguish between stable MCI (sMCI) cases (i.e., patients who do not convert to AD for at least three years) and progressive MCI (pMCI) cases (i.e., patients who convert to AD in three years or sooner). Delayed diagnosis of AD also disproportionately affects underrepresented and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. The significant positive impact of an early diagnosis solution for AD across diverse ethno-racial and demographic groups is well-known and recognized. While advancements in high-throughput technologies have enabled the generation of vast amounts of multimodal clinical, and neuroimaging datasets related to AD, most methods utilizing these data sets for diagnostic purposes have not found their way in clinical settings. To better understand the landscape, we surveyed the major preprocessing, data management, traditional machine-learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) techniques used for diagnosing AD using neuroimaging data such as structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and positron emission tomography (PET). Once we had a good understanding of the methods available, we conducted a study to assess the reproducibility and generalizability of open-source ML models. Our evaluation shows that existing models show reduced generalizability when different cohorts of the data modality are used while controlling other computational factors. The paper concludes with a discussion of major challenges that plague ML models for AD diagnosis and biomarker discovery.

使用神经成像数据诊断阿尔茨海默病的机器学习模型:调查、可重复性和概括性评估。
阿尔茨海默病(AD)的临床诊断通常是在出现短期记忆丧失等症状后做出的,这使干预和治疗选择最小化。现有的筛查技术无法区分稳定型MCI (sMCI)病例(即至少3年内未转化为AD的患者)和进行性MCI (pMCI)病例(即在3年或更短时间内转化为AD的患者)。阿尔茨海默病的延迟诊断也不成比例地影响到代表性不足和社会经济上处于不利地位的人群。在不同民族、种族和人口群体中,AD早期诊断解决方案的显著积极影响是众所周知和公认的。虽然高通量技术的进步已经能够产生大量与AD相关的多模式临床和神经成像数据集,但大多数利用这些数据集进行诊断的方法尚未在临床环境中找到自己的方式。为了更好地了解这一前景,我们调查了用于诊断AD的主要预处理、数据管理、传统机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)技术,这些技术使用神经成像数据,如结构磁共振成像(sMRI)、功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和正电子发射断层扫描(PET)。一旦我们对可用的方法有了很好的理解,我们就进行了一项研究,以评估开源ML模型的可重复性和泛化性。我们的评估表明,在控制其他计算因素的情况下,当使用不同数据模式的队列时,现有模型的泛化性降低。本文最后讨论了困扰ML模型用于AD诊断和生物标志物发现的主要挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Informatics
Brain Informatics Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain Informatics is an international, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary open-access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen, which provides a unique platform for researchers and practitioners to disseminate original research on computational and informatics technologies related to brain. This journal addresses the computational, cognitive, physiological, biological, physical, ecological and social perspectives of brain informatics. It also welcomes emerging information technologies and advanced neuro-imaging technologies, such as big data analytics and interactive knowledge discovery related to various large-scale brain studies and their applications. This journal will publish high-quality original research papers, brief reports and critical reviews in all theoretical, technological, clinical and interdisciplinary studies that make up the field of brain informatics and its applications in brain-machine intelligence, brain-inspired intelligent systems, mental health and brain disorders, etc. The scope of papers includes the following five tracks: Track 1: Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Brain Science Track 2: Human Information Processing Systems Track 3: Brain Big Data Analytics, Curation and Management Track 4: Informatics Paradigms for Brain and Mental Health Research Track 5: Brain-Machine Intelligence and Brain-Inspired Computing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信