Accelerated Relief: A Narrative Review of Two-Daily Fractions Palliative Radiotherapy in Advanced Cancer Care.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1177/15330338241293174
Erika Galietta, Costanza M Donati, Letizia Cavallini, Filippo Candoli, Francesco Cellini, Gabriella Macchia, Francesco Deodato, A F M Kamal Uddin, Mostafa A Sumon, Tigeneh Wondemagegnehu, Biniyam Tefera Deressa, Milly Buwenge, Alessio G Morganti, Savino Cilla
{"title":"Accelerated Relief: A Narrative Review of Two-Daily Fractions Palliative Radiotherapy in Advanced Cancer Care.","authors":"Erika Galietta, Costanza M Donati, Letizia Cavallini, Filippo Candoli, Francesco Cellini, Gabriella Macchia, Francesco Deodato, A F M Kamal Uddin, Mostafa A Sumon, Tigeneh Wondemagegnehu, Biniyam Tefera Deressa, Milly Buwenge, Alessio G Morganti, Savino Cilla","doi":"10.1177/15330338241293174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AimsThis review aims to synthesize the existing literature on palliative radiotherapy (RT) delivered in two daily fractions for patients with advanced cancer, focusing on its impact on symptom alleviation, treatment tolerance, and the implications for clinical practice and future research.MethodsAn international team conducted this narrative review, adhering to SANRA guidelines. Studies published in English on palliative RT delivered in two daily fractions were selected without date restrictions. The literature search, using a combination of specific key terms, led to a comprehensive examination of relevant studies. Data on study objectives, treatment approaches, palliative effectiveness, and toxicity were extracted and qualitatively analyzed.ResultsThe review included 29 publications, showing consistent efficacy in symptom reduction (63.0%-100% palliative response rate) and general tolerability across various cancer types. These studies highlighted the potential radiobiological advantages and practicality of accelerated multi-fractionated regimens, which provide rapid tumor response with reduced late toxicity risks. Furthermore, the logistical benefits of such treatments, including shorter hospital stays and minimized travel requirements, were noted as particularly valuable during challenging times such as recent pandemics.ConclusionsThe evidence supports the integration of evidence-based, accelerated-hypofractionated RT into palliative care strategies, ensuring effective symptom management with minimal patient burden. Future research should focus on comparative studies on single versus multiple-cycle treatments, optimal intervals between treatment cycles, and the integration of advanced RT techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":22203,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","volume":"24 ","pages":"15330338241293174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11930462/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338241293174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AimsThis review aims to synthesize the existing literature on palliative radiotherapy (RT) delivered in two daily fractions for patients with advanced cancer, focusing on its impact on symptom alleviation, treatment tolerance, and the implications for clinical practice and future research.MethodsAn international team conducted this narrative review, adhering to SANRA guidelines. Studies published in English on palliative RT delivered in two daily fractions were selected without date restrictions. The literature search, using a combination of specific key terms, led to a comprehensive examination of relevant studies. Data on study objectives, treatment approaches, palliative effectiveness, and toxicity were extracted and qualitatively analyzed.ResultsThe review included 29 publications, showing consistent efficacy in symptom reduction (63.0%-100% palliative response rate) and general tolerability across various cancer types. These studies highlighted the potential radiobiological advantages and practicality of accelerated multi-fractionated regimens, which provide rapid tumor response with reduced late toxicity risks. Furthermore, the logistical benefits of such treatments, including shorter hospital stays and minimized travel requirements, were noted as particularly valuable during challenging times such as recent pandemics.ConclusionsThe evidence supports the integration of evidence-based, accelerated-hypofractionated RT into palliative care strategies, ensuring effective symptom management with minimal patient burden. Future research should focus on comparative studies on single versus multiple-cycle treatments, optimal intervals between treatment cycles, and the integration of advanced RT techniques.

加速缓解:每日两次姑息放疗在晚期癌症治疗中的叙述性回顾。
目的本综述旨在综合目前有关姑息放疗(palliative radiation, RT)治疗晚期癌症患者的文献,重点介绍姑息放疗对症状缓解、治疗耐受性的影响,以及对临床实践和未来研究的启示。方法:一个国际团队遵循SANRA指南进行了这次叙述性综述。以英文发表的关于每日两次姑息性放疗的研究没有日期限制。文献检索,使用特定关键词的组合,导致相关研究的全面检查。提取有关研究目标、治疗方法、缓解效果和毒性的数据并进行定性分析。结果该综述纳入了29篇出版物,显示了不同癌症类型在症状减轻(63.0%-100%姑息缓解率)和总体耐受性方面的一致疗效。这些研究强调了潜在的放射生物学优势和加速多分步方案的实用性,这些方案提供了快速的肿瘤反应,降低了晚期毒性风险。此外,与会者指出,这种治疗的后勤好处,包括缩短住院时间和尽量减少旅行需要,在最近大流行病等困难时期尤为宝贵。结论证据支持将循证、加速低分割放疗纳入姑息治疗策略,确保有效的症状管理和最小的患者负担。未来的研究应侧重于单周期与多周期治疗的比较研究,治疗周期之间的最佳间隔,以及先进的放疗技术的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment (TCRT) is a JCR-ranked, broad-spectrum, open access, peer-reviewed publication whose aim is to provide researchers and clinicians with a platform to share and discuss developments in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信