Virtual reality improves pain threshold and recall in healthy adults: A randomized, crossover study

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Samuel T. Rodriguez MD , Ricardo T. Jimenez BA , Ellen Y. Wang MD , Michelle Zuniga-Hernandez BS , Janet Titzler BS , Christian Jackson BS , Man Yee Suen MMedSci , Craig Yamaguchi BS , Brian Ko , Jiang-Ti Kong MD , Thomas J. Caruso MD, PhD
{"title":"Virtual reality improves pain threshold and recall in healthy adults: A randomized, crossover study","authors":"Samuel T. Rodriguez MD ,&nbsp;Ricardo T. Jimenez BA ,&nbsp;Ellen Y. Wang MD ,&nbsp;Michelle Zuniga-Hernandez BS ,&nbsp;Janet Titzler BS ,&nbsp;Christian Jackson BS ,&nbsp;Man Yee Suen MMedSci ,&nbsp;Craig Yamaguchi BS ,&nbsp;Brian Ko ,&nbsp;Jiang-Ti Kong MD ,&nbsp;Thomas J. Caruso MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><div>Virtual reality (VR) is an emerging technology increasingly used to ameliorate acute and chronic pain although controlled, quantifiable data are limited. The purpose of this study is to evaluate VR's effect on heat pain threshold (HPT), pressure pain threshold (PPT), immediate pain and anxiety, and recalled pain and anxiety.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective, randomized, crossover clinical trial.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>The Stanford Chariot Program conducted this study at the Stanford School of Medicine Health System.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div>Healthy participants meeting inclusion criteria were recruited by solicitation from the Stanford School of Medicine Health System.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Participants were randomized by hand dominance and condition sequence and underwent standardized pain threshold tests with a thermode or an algometer during VR and control conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><div>Pain threshold, numeric pain scores, and anxiety scores were immediately recorded. Recalled pain and anxiety scores were recorded 24 h later.</div></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><div>A total of 80 participants were included, 40 who underwent HPT testing and 40 who underwent PPT testing. VR increased pain thresholds for both HPT (<em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.002) and PPT (<em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.044). The use of VR resulted in no difference in initial pain scores for HPT (<em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.432) or PPT (<em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.24). There was no difference in recalled pain when using VR for HPT (<em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.851) although there was for PPT (<em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.003). Initial and recalled anxiety scores for HPT (<em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.006, <em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.018, respectively) and PPT (<em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.014, <em>P</em> <em>=</em> 0.002, respectively) were all reduced when using VR.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrates that VR increased pain thresholds while modulating initial and recalled experiences with anxiety, which has implications for enhancing patient experiences during medical interventions and long-term health outcomes by optimizing memories during stressful events.</div><div>Clinical trial registration: <span><span>NCT05836649</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, 4/19/23.</div><div>IRB registration: Stanford IRB #69330.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 111816"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025000765","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective

Virtual reality (VR) is an emerging technology increasingly used to ameliorate acute and chronic pain although controlled, quantifiable data are limited. The purpose of this study is to evaluate VR's effect on heat pain threshold (HPT), pressure pain threshold (PPT), immediate pain and anxiety, and recalled pain and anxiety.

Design

Prospective, randomized, crossover clinical trial.

Setting

The Stanford Chariot Program conducted this study at the Stanford School of Medicine Health System.

Patients

Healthy participants meeting inclusion criteria were recruited by solicitation from the Stanford School of Medicine Health System.

Interventions

Participants were randomized by hand dominance and condition sequence and underwent standardized pain threshold tests with a thermode or an algometer during VR and control conditions.

Measurements

Pain threshold, numeric pain scores, and anxiety scores were immediately recorded. Recalled pain and anxiety scores were recorded 24 h later.

Main results

A total of 80 participants were included, 40 who underwent HPT testing and 40 who underwent PPT testing. VR increased pain thresholds for both HPT (P = 0.002) and PPT (P = 0.044). The use of VR resulted in no difference in initial pain scores for HPT (P = 0.432) or PPT (P = 0.24). There was no difference in recalled pain when using VR for HPT (P = 0.851) although there was for PPT (P = 0.003). Initial and recalled anxiety scores for HPT (P = 0.006, P = 0.018, respectively) and PPT (P = 0.014, P = 0.002, respectively) were all reduced when using VR.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that VR increased pain thresholds while modulating initial and recalled experiences with anxiety, which has implications for enhancing patient experiences during medical interventions and long-term health outcomes by optimizing memories during stressful events.
Clinical trial registration: NCT05836649, 4/19/23.
IRB registration: Stanford IRB #69330.
虚拟现实技术可提高健康成年人的疼痛阈值和回忆能力:一项随机交叉研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信