Optimizing intermittent dosing of oral small molecule inhibitors.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Jina Yun, Amy Ly Indorf
{"title":"Optimizing intermittent dosing of oral small molecule inhibitors.","authors":"Jina Yun, Amy Ly Indorf","doi":"10.1177/10781552251327598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionWith recent expansion of oral small molecule inhibitors, the drug development studies need to provide insight into optimal dose selection for these agents with vastly different mechanism and pharmacokinetic considerations compared to our traditional chemotherapy agents. Currently there is one published meta-analysis that examines intermittent and alternative dosing of oral small molecule inhibitors and it is unclear what guidance is available for treatment personalization beyond package insert labeling for patients undergoing toxicities from treatment.MethodsA systematic review of oral small molecule inhibitors with intermittent dosing was conducted in the National Library of Medicine PubMed database. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data was extracted to summarize findings on available guidance for intermittent or alternative dosing of oral small molecule inhibitors. Studies were categorized based on food and drug administration (FDA) approved or non-FDA approved agents, and further characterized by comparison of different dosing schemas.ResultsFifty-five trials were included in the final review and data analysis. Thirty-three trials were phase 1 trials, 26 trials for FDA approved agents and 29 non-FDA approved agents. Most trials reported on agents used in solid tumors, particularly renal cell carcinoma, with most trials examining sunitinib. Of the 55 trials, 28 compared different dosing strategies with 26 of the 28 trials examining efficacy outcomes with 27 of the 28 trials examining safety outcomes.ConclusionsThis systematic review found limited guidance for clinicians in optimizing dosing for intermittently dosed oral small molecule inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552251327598"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552251327598","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionWith recent expansion of oral small molecule inhibitors, the drug development studies need to provide insight into optimal dose selection for these agents with vastly different mechanism and pharmacokinetic considerations compared to our traditional chemotherapy agents. Currently there is one published meta-analysis that examines intermittent and alternative dosing of oral small molecule inhibitors and it is unclear what guidance is available for treatment personalization beyond package insert labeling for patients undergoing toxicities from treatment.MethodsA systematic review of oral small molecule inhibitors with intermittent dosing was conducted in the National Library of Medicine PubMed database. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data was extracted to summarize findings on available guidance for intermittent or alternative dosing of oral small molecule inhibitors. Studies were categorized based on food and drug administration (FDA) approved or non-FDA approved agents, and further characterized by comparison of different dosing schemas.ResultsFifty-five trials were included in the final review and data analysis. Thirty-three trials were phase 1 trials, 26 trials for FDA approved agents and 29 non-FDA approved agents. Most trials reported on agents used in solid tumors, particularly renal cell carcinoma, with most trials examining sunitinib. Of the 55 trials, 28 compared different dosing strategies with 26 of the 28 trials examining efficacy outcomes with 27 of the 28 trials examining safety outcomes.ConclusionsThis systematic review found limited guidance for clinicians in optimizing dosing for intermittently dosed oral small molecule inhibitors.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信