{"title":"Optimizing intermittent dosing of oral small molecule inhibitors.","authors":"Jina Yun, Amy Ly Indorf","doi":"10.1177/10781552251327598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionWith recent expansion of oral small molecule inhibitors, the drug development studies need to provide insight into optimal dose selection for these agents with vastly different mechanism and pharmacokinetic considerations compared to our traditional chemotherapy agents. Currently there is one published meta-analysis that examines intermittent and alternative dosing of oral small molecule inhibitors and it is unclear what guidance is available for treatment personalization beyond package insert labeling for patients undergoing toxicities from treatment.MethodsA systematic review of oral small molecule inhibitors with intermittent dosing was conducted in the National Library of Medicine PubMed database. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data was extracted to summarize findings on available guidance for intermittent or alternative dosing of oral small molecule inhibitors. Studies were categorized based on food and drug administration (FDA) approved or non-FDA approved agents, and further characterized by comparison of different dosing schemas.ResultsFifty-five trials were included in the final review and data analysis. Thirty-three trials were phase 1 trials, 26 trials for FDA approved agents and 29 non-FDA approved agents. Most trials reported on agents used in solid tumors, particularly renal cell carcinoma, with most trials examining sunitinib. Of the 55 trials, 28 compared different dosing strategies with 26 of the 28 trials examining efficacy outcomes with 27 of the 28 trials examining safety outcomes.ConclusionsThis systematic review found limited guidance for clinicians in optimizing dosing for intermittently dosed oral small molecule inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552251327598"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552251327598","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
IntroductionWith recent expansion of oral small molecule inhibitors, the drug development studies need to provide insight into optimal dose selection for these agents with vastly different mechanism and pharmacokinetic considerations compared to our traditional chemotherapy agents. Currently there is one published meta-analysis that examines intermittent and alternative dosing of oral small molecule inhibitors and it is unclear what guidance is available for treatment personalization beyond package insert labeling for patients undergoing toxicities from treatment.MethodsA systematic review of oral small molecule inhibitors with intermittent dosing was conducted in the National Library of Medicine PubMed database. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data was extracted to summarize findings on available guidance for intermittent or alternative dosing of oral small molecule inhibitors. Studies were categorized based on food and drug administration (FDA) approved or non-FDA approved agents, and further characterized by comparison of different dosing schemas.ResultsFifty-five trials were included in the final review and data analysis. Thirty-three trials were phase 1 trials, 26 trials for FDA approved agents and 29 non-FDA approved agents. Most trials reported on agents used in solid tumors, particularly renal cell carcinoma, with most trials examining sunitinib. Of the 55 trials, 28 compared different dosing strategies with 26 of the 28 trials examining efficacy outcomes with 27 of the 28 trials examining safety outcomes.ConclusionsThis systematic review found limited guidance for clinicians in optimizing dosing for intermittently dosed oral small molecule inhibitors.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...