Association of advanced age and aetiology of cardiac arrest with outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a secondary analysis of multicentre registry study in Japan.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Yuzuru Mochida, Tomoya Okazaki, Mitsuaki Kojima, Tomohisa Shoko, Akihiko Inoue, Toru Hifumi, Tetsuya Sakamoto, Yasuhiro Kuroda
{"title":"Association of advanced age and aetiology of cardiac arrest with outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a secondary analysis of multicentre registry study in Japan.","authors":"Yuzuru Mochida, Tomoya Okazaki, Mitsuaki Kojima, Tomohisa Shoko, Akihiko Inoue, Toru Hifumi, Tetsuya Sakamoto, Yasuhiro Kuroda","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2023-213510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in older patients, particularly those aged ≥75 years, remain limited and inconsistent. In this study, we investigated the association between advanced age and outcomes in patients receiving ECPR and determined differences in outcomes by aetiology of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) to identify older patients who may benefit from ECPR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis of a retrospective multicentre cohort study in Japan included adult patients with OHCA who received ECPR between 2013 and 2018. The study outcomes were unfavourable neurological outcomes at discharge, in-hospital mortality and ECPR-related complications. The study cohort was categorised by age groups, and the association between age group and outcomes was investigated. We also compared patient characteristics between favourable and unfavourable outcome groups and performed subgroup analysis to gain insights regarding the group of older patients who could benefit from ECPR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1904 included patients, 1106 were aged <65 years, 547 were 65-74 years, and 251 were ≥75 years. Patients aged 65-74 years and those aged <65 years had comparable rates of unfavourable neurological outcomes and in-hospital mortality. However, patients aged ≥75 years had significantly higher rates of unfavourable neurological outcomes and in-hospital mortality than those aged <65 years. Subgroup analysis of crude mortality rates revealed relatively high survival rates for patients with pulmonary embolism (54.5%) or hypothermia (25%) compared to those with other causes of arrest in the ≥75 years group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with OHCA aged ≥75 years and receiving ECPR are at higher risk of unfavourable neurological outcomes and in-hospital mortality than those aged <65 years. However, neurological outcomes and in-hospital mortality in patients aged ≥75 years vary with the causes of OHCA. ECPR outcomes in super-geriatric patients with OHCA may be comparable to those in younger patients for specific aetiologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2023-213510","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Data on extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in older patients, particularly those aged ≥75 years, remain limited and inconsistent. In this study, we investigated the association between advanced age and outcomes in patients receiving ECPR and determined differences in outcomes by aetiology of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) to identify older patients who may benefit from ECPR.

Methods: This secondary analysis of a retrospective multicentre cohort study in Japan included adult patients with OHCA who received ECPR between 2013 and 2018. The study outcomes were unfavourable neurological outcomes at discharge, in-hospital mortality and ECPR-related complications. The study cohort was categorised by age groups, and the association between age group and outcomes was investigated. We also compared patient characteristics between favourable and unfavourable outcome groups and performed subgroup analysis to gain insights regarding the group of older patients who could benefit from ECPR.

Results: Of the 1904 included patients, 1106 were aged <65 years, 547 were 65-74 years, and 251 were ≥75 years. Patients aged 65-74 years and those aged <65 years had comparable rates of unfavourable neurological outcomes and in-hospital mortality. However, patients aged ≥75 years had significantly higher rates of unfavourable neurological outcomes and in-hospital mortality than those aged <65 years. Subgroup analysis of crude mortality rates revealed relatively high survival rates for patients with pulmonary embolism (54.5%) or hypothermia (25%) compared to those with other causes of arrest in the ≥75 years group.

Conclusions: Patients with OHCA aged ≥75 years and receiving ECPR are at higher risk of unfavourable neurological outcomes and in-hospital mortality than those aged <65 years. However, neurological outcomes and in-hospital mortality in patients aged ≥75 years vary with the causes of OHCA. ECPR outcomes in super-geriatric patients with OHCA may be comparable to those in younger patients for specific aetiologies.

接受体外心肺复苏的院外心脏骤停患者的高龄和心脏骤停病因与预后的关系:日本多中心登记研究的二次分析。
背景:有关老年患者,尤其是年龄≥75岁的患者接受体外心肺复苏(ECPR)的数据仍然有限且不一致。在这项研究中,我们调查了接受 ECPR 患者的高龄与预后之间的关系,并根据院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的病因确定预后的差异,以确定可能从 ECPR 中获益的老年患者:这项对日本一项回顾性多中心队列研究的二次分析纳入了2013年至2018年期间接受ECPR的OHCA成年患者。研究结果为出院时的不良神经功能预后、院内死亡率和 ECPR 相关并发症。研究队列按年龄组进行分类,并调查了年龄组与结果之间的关联。我们还比较了预后良好和预后不佳两组患者的特征,并进行了亚组分析,以了解哪些老年患者可从 ECPR 中获益:结果:在纳入的 1904 例患者中,有 1106 例患者的年龄达到结论年龄:接受 ECPR 的年龄≥75 岁的 OHCA 患者出现不利神经系统结果和院内死亡率的风险高于年龄≥75 岁的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信