Combination Therapy With Vigabatrin and Prednisolone Versus Vigabatrin Alone for Infantile Spasms.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Rachata Boonkrongsak, Kantapon Trongkamolchai, Sirorat Suwannachote, Somjit Sri-Udomkajorn, Raviwan Wittawassamrankul, Ravindra Arya, Kullasate Sakpichaisakul
{"title":"Combination Therapy With Vigabatrin and Prednisolone Versus Vigabatrin Alone for Infantile Spasms.","authors":"Rachata Boonkrongsak, Kantapon Trongkamolchai, Sirorat Suwannachote, Somjit Sri-Udomkajorn, Raviwan Wittawassamrankul, Ravindra Arya, Kullasate Sakpichaisakul","doi":"10.1002/acn3.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study evaluated the effectiveness of combination therapy with vigabatrin and prednisolone versus vigabatrin alone for treating infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, single-blind, randomized trial enrolled infants aged 2-14 months with new-onset IESS, randomly assigned them (1:1) to receive either combination therapy with vigabatrin (100-150 mg/kg/day) and prednisolone (40-60 mg/day) or vigabatrin alone. The primary outcome was sustained spasm remission between days 14 and 42. The trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier) was terminated early due to an interim analysis revealing a significant difference between treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 17 infants were assigned to combination therapy and 24 to vigabatrin alone. The median lead time to treatment for combination therapy was 30 days, compared to 60 days for the vigabatrin group (p = 0.442). Sustained spasm remission between days 14 and 42 occurred in 13 (77%) of 17 infants on combination therapy and in 8 (33%) of 24 infants on vigabatrin alone (OR 6.5, 95% CI 1.7, 29.6, p = 0.009). Combination therapy was more effective in achieving an electroclinical response by day 14 (OR 9.3, 95% CI 2.0, 54.3, p = 0.006) but not by day 42 (OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.5, 7.1, p = 0.351). Hospitalization occurred in six (35%) infants in the combination therapy group and two (8%) in the vigabatrin alone group (p = 0.05). One death was reported in the vigabatrin group.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Despite early termination, this study showed that combination therapy is significantly more effective in achieving clinical remission of spasms and an electroclinical response by day 14.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT04302116.</p>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.70034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The study evaluated the effectiveness of combination therapy with vigabatrin and prednisolone versus vigabatrin alone for treating infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS).

Methods: This single-center, single-blind, randomized trial enrolled infants aged 2-14 months with new-onset IESS, randomly assigned them (1:1) to receive either combination therapy with vigabatrin (100-150 mg/kg/day) and prednisolone (40-60 mg/day) or vigabatrin alone. The primary outcome was sustained spasm remission between days 14 and 42. The trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier) was terminated early due to an interim analysis revealing a significant difference between treatment groups.

Results: In all, 17 infants were assigned to combination therapy and 24 to vigabatrin alone. The median lead time to treatment for combination therapy was 30 days, compared to 60 days for the vigabatrin group (p = 0.442). Sustained spasm remission between days 14 and 42 occurred in 13 (77%) of 17 infants on combination therapy and in 8 (33%) of 24 infants on vigabatrin alone (OR 6.5, 95% CI 1.7, 29.6, p = 0.009). Combination therapy was more effective in achieving an electroclinical response by day 14 (OR 9.3, 95% CI 2.0, 54.3, p = 0.006) but not by day 42 (OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.5, 7.1, p = 0.351). Hospitalization occurred in six (35%) infants in the combination therapy group and two (8%) in the vigabatrin alone group (p = 0.05). One death was reported in the vigabatrin group.

Interpretation: Despite early termination, this study showed that combination therapy is significantly more effective in achieving clinical remission of spasms and an electroclinical response by day 14.

Trial registration: NCT04302116.

维加巴特林和强的松龙联合治疗婴儿痉挛与单独维加巴特林的比较。
目的:评价维加巴林联合强的松龙与单独维加巴林治疗婴儿癫痫痉挛综合征(IESS)的疗效。方法:这项单中心、单盲、随机试验招募了2-14个月的新发IESS婴儿,随机分配(1:1)接受vigabatrin (100- 150mg /kg/天)和强的松龙(40- 60mg /天)联合治疗或vigabatrin单独治疗。主要结局是14 - 42天痉挛持续缓解。由于中期分析显示治疗组之间存在显著差异,该试验(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符)提前终止。结果:总共有17名婴儿接受联合治疗,24名婴儿单独服用维加巴特林。联合治疗的中位提前期为30天,而vigabatrin组为60天(p = 0.442)。在联合治疗的17名婴儿中,有13名(77%)在14至42天之间出现持续痉挛缓解,24名婴儿中有8名(33%)单独使用维加巴特林(OR 6.5, 95% CI 1.7, 29.6, p = 0.009)。联合治疗在第14天获得电临床反应更有效(OR 9.3, 95% CI 2.0, 54.3, p = 0.006),但在第42天则不是(OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.5, 7.1, p = 0.351)。联合治疗组有6例(35%)患儿住院,单独维加巴林组有2例(8%)患儿住院(p = 0.05)。维加巴特林组报告1例死亡。解释:尽管早期终止,该研究表明,联合治疗在实现痉挛的临床缓解和第14天的电临床反应方面显着更有效。试验注册:NCT04302116。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信