Nerve Transfer Strategies for Restoring Bladder, Bowel, Genital, and Lower Extremity Functions in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Stuti P Garg, Chirag Goel, Geneviève L Putnam, Joshua P Weissman, Sammer Marzouk, Seong Park, Rena A Li, Peter Ullrich, Robert D Galiano
{"title":"Nerve Transfer Strategies for Restoring Bladder, Bowel, Genital, and Lower Extremity Functions in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Stuti P Garg, Chirag Goel, Geneviève L Putnam, Joshua P Weissman, Sammer Marzouk, Seong Park, Rena A Li, Peter Ullrich, Robert D Galiano","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nerve transfers have been proposed solutions for urinary, bowel, and genital dysfunction after spinal cord injury (SCI). However, there remains a need to characterize nerve candidates and other treatment variables for SCI. The objective of this systematic review was to characterize nerve transfer strategies and outcomes for the restoration of bladder, bowel, genital, and lower extremity function after SCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane, MEDLINE, and Embase libraries were queried according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines for articles that presented outcomes after SCI in humans, animals, and cadavers treated with nerve transfer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one studies with 471 subjects were included. Thirteen studies were anatomical feasibility, 11 were animal, and 7 were clinical studies. The sacral (n = 218) and pudendal (n = 100) nerves were injured the most. There were 490 nerve transfers, with genitofemoral (n = 113) and femoral (n = 88) nerves transferred the most. Satisfactory bladder void control was regained in 75% of sacral, 100% of intercostal, and 88% of lumbar nerve transfer patients. Spontaneous void of bowel was regained in 78% of lumbar nerve transfer patients. Two patients with lumbosacral plexus nerve root injuries had improved knee extension from grade 0/5 to 2/5 and 3/5 after obturator nerve transfer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review demonstrates feasibility of transferring genitofemoral, femoral, sacral, and ilioinguinal nerves for the restoration of bladder, bowel, genital, and lower extremity function. While these studies suggest potential nerve transfer options, only 7 studies examined the outcomes in humans. Both the feasibility and applicability of nerve transfer after SCI must be explored further in clinical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"94 4","pages":"479-486"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004219","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nerve transfers have been proposed solutions for urinary, bowel, and genital dysfunction after spinal cord injury (SCI). However, there remains a need to characterize nerve candidates and other treatment variables for SCI. The objective of this systematic review was to characterize nerve transfer strategies and outcomes for the restoration of bladder, bowel, genital, and lower extremity function after SCI.

Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, MEDLINE, and Embase libraries were queried according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines for articles that presented outcomes after SCI in humans, animals, and cadavers treated with nerve transfer.

Results: Thirty-one studies with 471 subjects were included. Thirteen studies were anatomical feasibility, 11 were animal, and 7 were clinical studies. The sacral (n = 218) and pudendal (n = 100) nerves were injured the most. There were 490 nerve transfers, with genitofemoral (n = 113) and femoral (n = 88) nerves transferred the most. Satisfactory bladder void control was regained in 75% of sacral, 100% of intercostal, and 88% of lumbar nerve transfer patients. Spontaneous void of bowel was regained in 78% of lumbar nerve transfer patients. Two patients with lumbosacral plexus nerve root injuries had improved knee extension from grade 0/5 to 2/5 and 3/5 after obturator nerve transfer.

Conclusions: This review demonstrates feasibility of transferring genitofemoral, femoral, sacral, and ilioinguinal nerves for the restoration of bladder, bowel, genital, and lower extremity function. While these studies suggest potential nerve transfer options, only 7 studies examined the outcomes in humans. Both the feasibility and applicability of nerve transfer after SCI must be explored further in clinical research.

脊髓损伤后恢复膀胱、肠、生殖器和下肢功能的神经移植策略:系统综述。
背景:神经转移已被提出解决脊髓损伤(SCI)后泌尿、肠和生殖功能障碍的方法。然而,仍然需要对脊髓损伤的候选神经和其他治疗变量进行表征。本系统综述的目的是描述脊髓损伤后膀胱、肠道、生殖器和下肢功能恢复的神经移植策略和结果。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,对PubMed、Cochrane、MEDLINE和Embase库进行查询,这些文献介绍了神经移植治疗的人类、动物和尸体脊髓损伤后的结果。结果:纳入31项研究,471名受试者。解剖可行性研究13项,动物研究11项,临床研究7项。骶神经(218例)和阴部神经(100例)损伤最多。490例神经转移,以生殖股神经(113例)和股神经(88例)转移最多。75%的骶神经转移患者、100%的肋间神经转移患者和88%的腰神经转移患者膀胱空恢复满意。78%的腰神经移植患者恢复了自发的肠空。2例腰骶丛神经根损伤患者经闭孔神经移植后,膝关节伸展度从0/5级提高到2/5级和3/5级。结论:本文综述了移植生殖股神经、股神经、骶神经和髂腹股沟神经用于膀胱、肠、生殖器和下肢功能恢复的可行性。虽然这些研究提出了潜在的神经移植选择,但只有7项研究检查了人类的结果。脊髓损伤后神经移植的可行性和适用性有待临床研究进一步探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信