Chemotherapy Trends in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: 2004 to 2020.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Aditya Ravindra, Bradley Loeffler, Luna Acharya, Avantika Pyakuryal, Vijaya Raj Bhatt, Prajwal Dhakal
{"title":"Chemotherapy Trends in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: 2004 to 2020.","authors":"Aditya Ravindra, Bradley Loeffler, Luna Acharya, Avantika Pyakuryal, Vijaya Raj Bhatt, Prajwal Dhakal","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.02.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chemotherapy is crucial for treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML), as it improves survival and quality of life. However, prior studies have shown that many eligible patients in the United States do not receive chemotherapy due to demographic and socioeconomic disparities.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We utilized the National Cancer Database to analyze chemotherapy utilization in 82,755 patients with AML from 2004 to 2020. We examined trends in 2 time periods, 2004 to 2010 and 2011 to 2019, with a separate analysis for 2020 to evaluate the impact of the COVID pandemic on chemotherapy use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all patients with AML, 57.1% received multiagent chemotherapy, 20.5% received single-agent chemotherapy, and 22.4% received no chemotherapy. Chemotherapy use rose from 72.9% in 2004 to 81.3% in 2019, then slightly declined to 80.6% in 2020. The odds of receiving chemotherapy increased significantly in 2011 to 2019 compared to 2004 to 2010 based on age (P = .02), race (P < .01), and AML subtype (P = .03). Patients aged 18 to 40 consistently had higher chemotherapy utilization rates, with treatment odds rising across all age groups. While Black patients were less likely than White patients to receive chemotherapy from 2004 to 2010, their odds improved significantly in 2011 to 2019. Despite increased chemotherapy use across all AML subtypes, therapy-related AML consistently showed the lowest odds of treatment. Lower-income patients, those with more co-morbidities, and female patients had reduced chances of receiving chemotherapy, and these inequities remained largely consistent over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This large database study highlights improved but persistent disparities based on demographic and socioeconomic status, calling for innovative measures to expand chemotherapy use.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.02.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chemotherapy is crucial for treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML), as it improves survival and quality of life. However, prior studies have shown that many eligible patients in the United States do not receive chemotherapy due to demographic and socioeconomic disparities.

Patients and methods: We utilized the National Cancer Database to analyze chemotherapy utilization in 82,755 patients with AML from 2004 to 2020. We examined trends in 2 time periods, 2004 to 2010 and 2011 to 2019, with a separate analysis for 2020 to evaluate the impact of the COVID pandemic on chemotherapy use.

Results: Among all patients with AML, 57.1% received multiagent chemotherapy, 20.5% received single-agent chemotherapy, and 22.4% received no chemotherapy. Chemotherapy use rose from 72.9% in 2004 to 81.3% in 2019, then slightly declined to 80.6% in 2020. The odds of receiving chemotherapy increased significantly in 2011 to 2019 compared to 2004 to 2010 based on age (P = .02), race (P < .01), and AML subtype (P = .03). Patients aged 18 to 40 consistently had higher chemotherapy utilization rates, with treatment odds rising across all age groups. While Black patients were less likely than White patients to receive chemotherapy from 2004 to 2010, their odds improved significantly in 2011 to 2019. Despite increased chemotherapy use across all AML subtypes, therapy-related AML consistently showed the lowest odds of treatment. Lower-income patients, those with more co-morbidities, and female patients had reduced chances of receiving chemotherapy, and these inequities remained largely consistent over time.

Conclusion: This large database study highlights improved but persistent disparities based on demographic and socioeconomic status, calling for innovative measures to expand chemotherapy use.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1606
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia and related disorders including macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, and plasma-cell dyscrasias. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信