Effect of external and internal cues on core muscle activation during the Sahrmann five-level core stability test.

Skyla Stifter, Jessie McCaffrey, Tyler Nichols, Ayse Ozcan Edeer, Justine Ward
{"title":"Effect of external and internal cues on core muscle activation during the Sahrmann five-level core stability test.","authors":"Skyla Stifter, Jessie McCaffrey, Tyler Nichols, Ayse Ozcan Edeer, Justine Ward","doi":"10.5662/wjm.v15.i1.92943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain in the back or pelvis or fear of back pain may affect the timing or co-contraction of the core muscles. In both static and dynamic movements, the Sahrmann core stability test provides an assessment of core muscle activation and a person's ability to stabilize the lumbopelvic complex. Preparatory cues and images can be used to increase the activation of these muscles. To attain optimal movement patterns, it will be necessary to determine what cueing will give the most effective results for core stability.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the effects of external and internal cues on core muscle activation during the Sahrmann five-level core stability test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Total 68 participants (21.83 ± 3.47 years) were randomly allocated to an external (<i>n</i> = 35) or internal cue group (<i>n</i> = 33). Participants performed the Sahrmann five-level core stability test without a cue as baseline and the five-level stability exercises with an internal or external cue. External cue group received a pressure biofeedback unit (PBU), and the internal cue group received an audio cue. A Delsys Trigno<sup>TM</sup> surface electromyography unit was used for muscle activation from the rectus abdominis, external oblique, and transverse abdominis/internal oblique muscles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Linear mixed effects model analysis showed that cueing had a significant effect on core muscle activation (<i>P</i> = 0.001); however, there was no significant difference between cue types (internal or external) (<i>P</i> = 0.130).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both external and internal cueing have significant effects on core muscle activation during the Sahrmann five-level core stability test and the PBU does not create higher muscle activation than internal cueing.</p>","PeriodicalId":94271,"journal":{"name":"World journal of methodology","volume":"15 1","pages":"92943"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11525895/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v15.i1.92943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain in the back or pelvis or fear of back pain may affect the timing or co-contraction of the core muscles. In both static and dynamic movements, the Sahrmann core stability test provides an assessment of core muscle activation and a person's ability to stabilize the lumbopelvic complex. Preparatory cues and images can be used to increase the activation of these muscles. To attain optimal movement patterns, it will be necessary to determine what cueing will give the most effective results for core stability.

Aim: To investigate the effects of external and internal cues on core muscle activation during the Sahrmann five-level core stability test.

Methods: Total 68 participants (21.83 ± 3.47 years) were randomly allocated to an external (n = 35) or internal cue group (n = 33). Participants performed the Sahrmann five-level core stability test without a cue as baseline and the five-level stability exercises with an internal or external cue. External cue group received a pressure biofeedback unit (PBU), and the internal cue group received an audio cue. A Delsys TrignoTM surface electromyography unit was used for muscle activation from the rectus abdominis, external oblique, and transverse abdominis/internal oblique muscles.

Results: Linear mixed effects model analysis showed that cueing had a significant effect on core muscle activation (P = 0.001); however, there was no significant difference between cue types (internal or external) (P = 0.130).

Conclusion: Both external and internal cueing have significant effects on core muscle activation during the Sahrmann five-level core stability test and the PBU does not create higher muscle activation than internal cueing.

在Sahrmann五级核心稳定性测试中,外部和内部线索对核心肌肉激活的影响。
背景:背部或骨盆疼痛或对背部疼痛的恐惧可能会影响核心肌肉的时间或共同收缩。在静态和动态运动中,Sahrmann核心稳定性测试提供了核心肌肉激活和一个人稳定腰骨盆复合体的能力的评估。预备提示和图像可以用来增加这些肌肉的激活。为了达到最佳的运动模式,有必要确定哪种动作对核心稳定性最有效。目的:探讨在Sahrmann五级核心稳定性测试中,外部和内部提示对核心肌激活的影响。方法:68名参与者(21.83±3.47岁)随机分为外部提示组(n = 35)和内部提示组(n = 33)。参与者在没有线索的情况下进行了Sahrmann五级核心稳定性测试,并在有内部或外部线索的情况下进行了五级稳定性练习。外部提示组给予压力生物反馈单元(PBU),内部提示组给予音频提示。使用Delsys TrignoTM表面肌电仪对腹直肌、腹外斜肌和腹横肌/腹内斜肌进行肌肉激活。结果:线性混合效应模型分析显示,提示对核心肌激活有显著影响(P = 0.001);而不同线索类型(内部或外部)之间无显著差异(P = 0.130)。结论:在Sahrmann五级核心稳定性测试中,外部和内部线索对核心肌肉激活均有显著影响,PBU并不比内部线索产生更高的肌肉激活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信