Higher plasma neurofilament-light chain concentration in drug-resistant epilepsy.

IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain communications Pub Date : 2025-03-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf108
Sarah Akel, Markus Axelsson, Fredrik Asztely, Henrik Zetterberg, Johan Zelano
{"title":"Higher plasma neurofilament-light chain concentration in drug-resistant epilepsy.","authors":"Sarah Akel, Markus Axelsson, Fredrik Asztely, Henrik Zetterberg, Johan Zelano","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcaf108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug-resistant epilepsy is the most severe form of epilepsy and is frequently associated with cognitive decline. Whether drug-resistant epilepsy results in neurodegeneration or other types of brain injury is not known, and early detection of detrimental clinical trajectories would be clinically very useful. Blood biomarkers of brain injury reflect neurodegeneration or brain injury in several brain diseases but have not been extensively studied in epilepsy. We investigated a panel of such markers in a large epilepsy cohort with an emphasis on assessing differences between drug-resistant and monotherapy-controlled epilepsy. Blood neurofilament light, glial fibrillary acidic protein, total tau, S100 calcium-binding protein B and neuron-specific enolase concentrations were measured in 444 patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with epilepsy participating in a prospective regional Biobank study in Västra Götaland (Sweden). Multiple linear regression assessed associations between clinical variables and marker levels. Levels were then compared between patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (<i>n</i> = 101) and patients with monotherapy-controlled epilepsy (<i>n</i> = 164). We also performed logistic regression analysis to evaluate the significance of the markers as predictors of epilepsy status (drug-resistant epilepsy or monotherapy-controlled epilepsy) while controlling for clinical variables: age, sex, epilepsy duration, epilepsy type and lesions. All markers correlated with age. In younger patients (≤50 years), cases of drug-resistant epilepsy had higher levels of neurofilament light (<i>P</i> = 0.002) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (<i>P</i> = 0.006) compared with monotherapy-controlled epilepsy. After excluding patients with known structural lesions, neurofilament light levels remained significantly elevated in drug-resistant epilepsy versus monotherapy-controlled epilepsy (<i>P</i> = 0.029). Neurofilament light also emerged as a significant predictor of drug-resistant status in a logistic regression model following adjustments for clinical variables. Future studies should explore if neurofilament light can be used for surveillance of disease course and whether it reflects brain injury in drug-resistant epilepsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93915,"journal":{"name":"Brain communications","volume":"7 2","pages":"fcaf108"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11925020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drug-resistant epilepsy is the most severe form of epilepsy and is frequently associated with cognitive decline. Whether drug-resistant epilepsy results in neurodegeneration or other types of brain injury is not known, and early detection of detrimental clinical trajectories would be clinically very useful. Blood biomarkers of brain injury reflect neurodegeneration or brain injury in several brain diseases but have not been extensively studied in epilepsy. We investigated a panel of such markers in a large epilepsy cohort with an emphasis on assessing differences between drug-resistant and monotherapy-controlled epilepsy. Blood neurofilament light, glial fibrillary acidic protein, total tau, S100 calcium-binding protein B and neuron-specific enolase concentrations were measured in 444 patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with epilepsy participating in a prospective regional Biobank study in Västra Götaland (Sweden). Multiple linear regression assessed associations between clinical variables and marker levels. Levels were then compared between patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (n = 101) and patients with monotherapy-controlled epilepsy (n = 164). We also performed logistic regression analysis to evaluate the significance of the markers as predictors of epilepsy status (drug-resistant epilepsy or monotherapy-controlled epilepsy) while controlling for clinical variables: age, sex, epilepsy duration, epilepsy type and lesions. All markers correlated with age. In younger patients (≤50 years), cases of drug-resistant epilepsy had higher levels of neurofilament light (P = 0.002) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (P = 0.006) compared with monotherapy-controlled epilepsy. After excluding patients with known structural lesions, neurofilament light levels remained significantly elevated in drug-resistant epilepsy versus monotherapy-controlled epilepsy (P = 0.029). Neurofilament light also emerged as a significant predictor of drug-resistant status in a logistic regression model following adjustments for clinical variables. Future studies should explore if neurofilament light can be used for surveillance of disease course and whether it reflects brain injury in drug-resistant epilepsy.

耐药癫痫患者血浆神经丝轻链浓度增高。
耐药癫痫是最严重的癫痫形式,通常与认知能力下降有关。耐药癫痫是否会导致神经变性或其他类型的脑损伤尚不清楚,早期发现有害的临床轨迹将在临床上非常有用。脑损伤的血液生物标志物反映了几种脑部疾病的神经变性或脑损伤,但尚未在癫痫中进行广泛研究。我们在一个大型癫痫队列中调查了一组这样的标志物,重点是评估耐药癫痫和单药控制癫痫之间的差异。在Västra Götaland(瑞典)的一项前瞻性区域生物银行研究中,对444名癫痫患者(年龄≥18岁)的血液神经丝光、胶质纤维酸性蛋白、总tau、S100钙结合蛋白B和神经元特异性烯醇化酶浓度进行了测量。多元线性回归评估临床变量与标志物水平之间的关系。然后比较耐药癫痫患者(n = 101)和单药控制癫痫患者(n = 164)的水平。在控制临床变量(年龄、性别、癫痫持续时间、癫痫类型和病变)的同时,我们还进行了logistic回归分析,以评估这些标志物作为癫痫状态(耐药癫痫或单药控制癫痫)预测因子的意义。所有标记都与年龄相关。在年轻患者(≤50岁)中,耐药癫痫患者的神经丝光(P = 0.002)和胶质纤维酸性蛋白(P = 0.006)水平高于单药控制癫痫患者。在排除已知结构病变的患者后,与单一治疗控制的癫痫相比,耐药癫痫患者的神经丝光水平仍显著升高(P = 0.029)。在调整临床变量后的逻辑回归模型中,神经丝光也成为耐药状态的重要预测因子。未来的研究应该探索神经丝光是否可以用于监测病程,以及它是否反映了耐药癫痫的脑损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信