Falsely Elevated Estradiol Levels Due to Heterophile Antibody Interference: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Ying Guo, Bin Wei, Wei Dai, Ge Zhang
{"title":"Falsely Elevated Estradiol Levels Due to Heterophile Antibody Interference: A Case Report and Literature Review.","authors":"Ying Guo, Bin Wei, Wei Dai, Ge Zhang","doi":"10.2174/0118715303352682250219044719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immunoassay interference remains an important issue in clinical laboratory medicine, and false increases in estradiol levels due to detection interference are rare, but they cannot be ignored.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>We herein report the case of a 41-year-old woman who underwent a series of extensive and superfluous medical examinations because of erroneous laboratory findings according to the Siemens Centaur serum estradiol assay due to heterophile antibody interference. Her estradiol levels were measured several times, which measured between 7534 and 9772 pg/mL. Heterophile antibody interference was identified through method comparisons, polyethylene glycol precipitation, a gradient dilution test, and the use of a heterophile-blocking reagent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The rapid identification of interference in estradiol testing poses a challenge for laboratory staff; however, it is vital for preventing unnecessary medical treatment and reducing healthcare costs. Analytical interference should be suspected when clinical manifestations do not align with laboratory results. Consequently, clinicians and laboratory personnel need to develop an anti- interference workflow to mitigate such occurrences in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":94316,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118715303352682250219044719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immunoassay interference remains an important issue in clinical laboratory medicine, and false increases in estradiol levels due to detection interference are rare, but they cannot be ignored.

Case presentation: We herein report the case of a 41-year-old woman who underwent a series of extensive and superfluous medical examinations because of erroneous laboratory findings according to the Siemens Centaur serum estradiol assay due to heterophile antibody interference. Her estradiol levels were measured several times, which measured between 7534 and 9772 pg/mL. Heterophile antibody interference was identified through method comparisons, polyethylene glycol precipitation, a gradient dilution test, and the use of a heterophile-blocking reagent.

Conclusion: The rapid identification of interference in estradiol testing poses a challenge for laboratory staff; however, it is vital for preventing unnecessary medical treatment and reducing healthcare costs. Analytical interference should be suspected when clinical manifestations do not align with laboratory results. Consequently, clinicians and laboratory personnel need to develop an anti- interference workflow to mitigate such occurrences in the future.

嗜异性抗体干扰导致雌二醇水平错误升高:1例报告及文献复习。
背景:免疫检测干扰是临床检验医学中的一个重要问题,由于检测干扰而导致雌二醇水平虚假升高的情况很少见,但也不容忽视。病例介绍:我们在此报告一例41岁的女性,她接受了一系列广泛和多余的医学检查,因为根据西门子半人马座血清雌二醇测定,由于异性恋抗体干扰,错误的实验室结果。多次测定雌二醇水平,结果在7534 ~ 9772 pg/mL之间。通过方法比较、聚乙二醇沉淀、梯度稀释试验和使用嗜异性抗体阻断试剂,确定了嗜异性抗体干扰。结论:快速鉴别雌二醇检测中的干扰因素是实验室工作人员面临的挑战;然而,它对于防止不必要的医疗和降低医疗成本至关重要。当临床表现与实验室结果不一致时,应怀疑分析干扰。因此,临床医生和实验室人员需要制定一套抗干扰工作流程,以减轻未来此类事件的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信