Current orthognathic surgery practices: A comprehensive survey from planning to discharge in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Anne-Kathrin Bär, Andreas Pabst, Frederic Bouffleur, Daniel G E Thiem, Richard Werkmeister, Marco R Kesting, Max Heiland, Bilal Al-Nawas, Philipp Becker
{"title":"Current orthognathic surgery practices: A comprehensive survey from planning to discharge in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.","authors":"Anne-Kathrin Bär, Andreas Pabst, Frederic Bouffleur, Daniel G E Thiem, Richard Werkmeister, Marco R Kesting, Max Heiland, Bilal Al-Nawas, Philipp Becker","doi":"10.1016/j.jcms.2025.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Detailed information on orthognathic surgery (OGS) practices in Germany, including treatment modalities, surgical concepts, and perioperative care standards, is limited. This study analyzed current practices along the patient pathway, from preoperative planning to discharge, through a nationwide survey of the German Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery using dynamic online questionnaires (up to 56 questions). Responses from 169 surgeons (response-rate 9.2%) revealed substantial variability in training, perioperative care, and digital workflow adoption. While 44.4% used a hybrid of digital and conventional planning methods, broader digital integration was limited by high costs and logistical challenges. Perioperative care varied, particularly in support concepts, blood management, and antibiotic prophylaxis duration, with shorter regimens (≤24h) more common at university-hospitals and private practices. However, 98% agreed on the use of prophylaxis. Surgical approaches were more standardized, with most respondents favoring pre-surgical orthodontics, third molar extraction before OGS, and the maxilla-first approach. Postoperatively, 76% transferred patients to standard care, with 3-5 days discharge times. Significant correlations were observed between surgeon experience, case volume, and improved outcomes, including reduced operative time and faster discharge. These findings underscore the need for standardized OGS protocols to enhance patient safety, optimize recovery, and ensure consistent practices across healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":54851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2025.03.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Detailed information on orthognathic surgery (OGS) practices in Germany, including treatment modalities, surgical concepts, and perioperative care standards, is limited. This study analyzed current practices along the patient pathway, from preoperative planning to discharge, through a nationwide survey of the German Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery using dynamic online questionnaires (up to 56 questions). Responses from 169 surgeons (response-rate 9.2%) revealed substantial variability in training, perioperative care, and digital workflow adoption. While 44.4% used a hybrid of digital and conventional planning methods, broader digital integration was limited by high costs and logistical challenges. Perioperative care varied, particularly in support concepts, blood management, and antibiotic prophylaxis duration, with shorter regimens (≤24h) more common at university-hospitals and private practices. However, 98% agreed on the use of prophylaxis. Surgical approaches were more standardized, with most respondents favoring pre-surgical orthodontics, third molar extraction before OGS, and the maxilla-first approach. Postoperatively, 76% transferred patients to standard care, with 3-5 days discharge times. Significant correlations were observed between surgeon experience, case volume, and improved outcomes, including reduced operative time and faster discharge. These findings underscore the need for standardized OGS protocols to enhance patient safety, optimize recovery, and ensure consistent practices across healthcare settings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
22.60%
发文量
117
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery publishes articles covering all aspects of surgery of the head, face and jaw. Specific topics covered recently have included: • Distraction osteogenesis • Synthetic bone substitutes • Fibroblast growth factors • Fetal wound healing • Skull base surgery • Computer-assisted surgery • Vascularized bone grafts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信